Sunday, July 21, 2013

Snowden court wants Evidence of Amnesty Int-HRW-Nobel Comm's Ecology-of-Peace credibility



Snowden Judge: Do Nobel Committee, Amnesty Int, Human Rights Watch have Evidence of Ecology of Peace Credibility?

Individuals associated with the (i) Norwegian Nobel Committee; (ii) Amnesty International; (iii) Human Rights Watch have made public alleged ‘Peace’ declarations regarding US v Snowden court proceedings. They are hereby invited to provide the court, prosecution and defence with evidence that their ‘Peace’ declarations were credible MILINT Ecology of Peace declarations. If so, to provide the court with a detailed MILINT Ecology of Peace Analysis of their Members Myfootprint.org Consumption footprint and Procreation footprints, by 17:00 HRS (PST) on 23 July 2013.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 20 July 2013

Notice to Norwegian Nobel Committee Nominator Professor Stefan Svallfors; Amnesty International: Executive Committee; Secretary General and International Secretariat; Human Rights Watch: Senior Management and Board of Directors; Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson, US District Court Eastern District of Virginia at Alexandria; United States Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Virginia; John A Kralik Jr, FBI, c/o Valerie Parlave. Asst Dir: FBI-VA: Washington Field Office; Edward J Snowden, c/o Glenn Greenwald, The Guardian; c/o Wikileaks Litigation & Press; President Nicolás Maduro, President of Venezuela; President Vladimir Putin, Kremlin Press Office; Lonnie Snowden, c/o Counsel: Bruce Fein; President Barack Obama, c/o: DNI: James Clapper

Amici Curiae, Andrea Muhrrteyn, an Alien on Pale Blue Dot invitation to (i) Nobel Committee; (ii) Amnesty International; (iii) Human Rights Watch to clarify the MILINT Ecology of Peace; or Civilian War is Peace credibility of their ‘Peace’ public statements in this US v. Snowden matter.

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Ecology of Peace Theses urges Britain to Dismiss charges against Woolwich Attackers of Drummer Lee Rigby



Ecology of Peace Theses urges Britain to dismiss charges against Woolwich Attackers of Drummer Lee Rigby: Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale

Britain's Civilized Patriarchy Legal Matrix Prosecutorial and Juristic Bishops have no legal ecological moral authority to prosecute Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, or adjudicate upon the alleged ‘lawfulness’ or ‘unlawfulness’ of their acts of murder, while ignoring the theft and thievery and participation in mass murder of the civilized patriarchy corporate elite, who purchased ‘Innocence for Sale’ Indulgences from legislators to avoid legislation that defines their ecologically criminal acts of billion dollar thievery and murder as ‘unlawful’.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 15 July 2013


Electronic Filing of Amicus to (i) Common Serjeant: His Honour Judge Brian Barker QC, Central Criminal Court / Old Bailey; (ii) Prisoners: Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, C/O Governor: Phil Wragg, Belmarsh Prison, c/o: Jeremy Wright MP, Minister for Prisons and Rehabilitation, Ministry of Justice; (iii) : Victim/Rigby Family: c/o Helen Grant MP, Minister for Victims and the Courts; and Rt Hon Philip Hammond MP, Secretary of State for Defence, Ministry of Defence. CC: Transparency: Muslim Community: Sec. Gen. Mr. Farooq Murad, Muslim Council of Britain & Sharia Council

Summary of the Æquilibriæx Amicus Argument: Theses on the Power and Efficacy of Civilized Patriarchy’s AnthroCorpocentric Indulgences Innocence for Sale Legal Matrix Jurisprudence:

Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, like Beate Zschape and Anders Breivik and many thousands of others, are simply low-level left/right, white/black, Muslim/Christian Ethnic-Conflict foot-soldiers, of Civilized Patriarchy’s AnthroCorpocentric Legal Matrix’s Control of the Reproduction Human Factory Farming War Economy Racket, and Consumptionism Cultural Colonialism Racket agenda’s.

These civilized patriarchy criminal charges against Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale should be:

[1] Suspended; until Britain’s legislators and/or jurists demonstrate their credible cause-effect-ecologically-literate-consciousness capacity for legislating an honest transparent social contract between the British Government and its citizens, by regulating the relations between humans, nature and other animals species and the relations between humans amongst themselves, in terms of their gender, culture, ethnic, religious and ideological conflicts; by (A) granting automatic equal legal personhood and rights to women, non-patriarchal – matriarchal or gender balanced – cultures’, nature and animal and plant species; and (B) legislating fully informed consenting military and intelligence enlistment agreements which accurately fully disclose to any prospective signer of such agreement that in the absence of legislation amending the Constitution’s rights to procreate and consume to ecological carrying capacity limits; any individual signing any British military enlistment form is signing up to be cannon fodder resource thieves and mass murderers for Britain’s civilized patriarchy human factory farming profiteering elite, based upon the legal authority of ecologically illiterate social contract jurisprudence; or (C) implementing and enforcing legislation which requires all British citizens to limit their rights to procreation and consumption to below carrying capacity levels.

[2] Dismissed; if Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale sign the MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Whistleblower/Activist Oath, and submits it to either the American Walk Your Footprint Talk to Support the Troops Military Advisory Board (11 retired Generals and Admirals concerned with ecological overshoot and scarcity induced resource war conflict); or to a British Walk Your Footprint Talk to Support the Troops Military Advisory Board of retired Generals and Admirals concerned with ecological overshoot and scarcity induced resource war conflict, of their own choosing.

Such a judicial act of suspension – or the parties mutual leadership focus on problem solving their dispute, by means of reaching a MILINT Ecology of Peace agreement for dismissal – of the case against Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, would act as a slap on the bare back of the ecologically illiterate newborn baby – breeding/consumption scarcity combatant – public.

Friday, July 12, 2013

Ecology-of-Peace-Theses urges Germany to dismiss murder charges against Beate Zschape



Aex/Ecology of Peace Amicus urges Judge Manfred Gotzl to dismiss murder charges against Beate Zschape

The Federal Republic of Germany Civilized Patriarchy Legal Matrix Prosecutorial and Juristic Bishops have no legal ecological moral authority to prosecute Ms. Zschape, or adjudicate upon the alleged ‘lawfulness’ or ‘unlawfulness’ of her Eco-Innocent leaver acts of murder, while ignoring the theft and thievery and participation in mass murder of the civilized patriarchy corporate elite, who purchased ‘Innocence for Sale’ Indulgences from legislators to avoid legislation that defines their ecologically criminal acts of billion dollar thievery and murder as ‘unlawful’.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | 12 July 2013 | TYGAE


Electronic Filing of Amicus to Judge Manfred Götzl, c/o Registrar of the Court, Oberlandesgericht München; Der Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof / Federal Prosecutor Harald Range; Beate Zschape Counsel: Wolfgang Heer, Wolfgang Stahl & Anja Sturm; CC: Transparency: Turkish Community: c/o: CEO: Fuat Sengul, Turkish Union in Berlin-Brandenburg. Subject: Deutschland v. Beate Zschäpe: Judge Manfred Götzl, Oberlandesgericht München

The electronic filing of the Amicus requests Judge Götzl’s consent to submit the attached Pro Se Motion and Æquilibriæx (Ecology of Peace) Amicus brief into the court record in this matter.

Conclusion of the Æquilibriæx Amicus Argument:

Theses on the Power and Efficacy of Civilized Patriarchy’s AnthroCorpocentric Indulgences Innocence for Sale Legal Matrix Jurisprudence:

[1] Beate Zschape, like Michael Adebolajo, Michael Adebowale, Anders Breivik and many thousands of others, are simply low-level left/right, white/black, Muslim/Christian Ethnic-Conflict foot-soldiers, of Civilized Patriarchy’s AnthroCorpocentric Legal Matrix’s Control of the Reproduction Human Factory Farming War Economy Racket, and Consumptionism Cultural Colonialism Racket agenda’s.

[8] These civilized patriarchy criminal charges against Beate Zschape should be:

[8.1] Suspended; until Germany’s legislators and/or jurists demonstrate their credible cause-effect-ecologically-literate-consciousness capacity for legislating an honest transparent social contract between the German Government and its citizens, by regulating the relations between humans, nature and other animals species and the relations between humans amongst themselves, in terms of their gender, culture, ethnic, religious and ideological conflicts; by (A) granting automatic equal legal personhood and rights to women, non-patriarchal – matriarchal or gender balanced – cultures’, nature and animal and plant species; and (B) legislating fully informed consenting military and intelligence enlistment agreements which accurately fully disclose to any prospective signer of such agreement that in the absence of legislation amending the Constitution’s rights to procreate and consume to ecological carrying capacity limits; any individual signing any German military enlistment form is signing up to be cannon fodder resource thieves and mass murderers for Germany’s civilized patriarchy human factory farming profiteering elite, based upon the legal authority of an ecologically illiterate constitution; or (C)implementing and enforcing legislation which requires all German citizens to limit their rights to procreation and consumption to below carrying capacity levels.

[8.2] Dismissed; if Ms. Zschape signs the MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Whistleblower/Activist Oath, and submits it to either the American Walk Your Footprint Talk to Support the Troops Military Advisory Board (11 retired Generals and Admirals concerned with ecological overshoot and scarcity induced resource war conflict); or to a German Walk Your Footprint Talk to Support the Troops Military Advisory Board of retired Generals and Admirals concerned with ecological overshoot and scarcity induced resource war conflict, of her own choosing.

[8.3] Such a judicial act of suspension – or the parties mutual leadership focus on problem solving their dispute, by means of reaching a MILINT Ecology of Peace agreement for dismissal – of the case against Ms Zschape, would act as a slap on the bare back of the newborn baby ecologically illiterate public.

Monday, May 27, 2013

MCB & EDL: MILINT Earth Day analysis of Cameron’s TERFOR Ethnic-Conflict Agenda



Letter to EDL & Muslim Council of Britain: MILINT Earth Day analysis of why Cameron’s TERFOR Agenda fails to confront the root causes of Scarcity induced Ethnic Conflict.

Cameron’s TERFOR Agenda fails to confront the root GDP/Growth Agenda causes of Scarcity induced Ethnic Conflict: because the Lord$ of War Profiteer$ from Ethnic Conflict Agenda is fully supported by African and Islamic Breeding War extremists and Western/European Consumption War extremists. Welcome to Civilized Patriarchy’s Human Factory Farming War Economy!!

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 27 May 2013


Conclusion reached:

Are UK Muslim and British Nationalist Leaders capable of:

[1] Confronting the reality that the Lord$ of War profit from the ethnic/religious/etc conflict resulting from African/Islamic/etc Breeding War civilized patriarchs incapacity or refusal to breed below carrying capacity & Western/etc Consumption War civilized patriarchs incapacity or refusal to consume below carrying capacity; and

[2] Giving Prime Minister David Cameron and his ProGrowth Corporate Lord$ of War Profiteer$ a big ‘F**k You’ by listening to Military Intelligence Leaders who have called for American/World Citizens to ‘Walk their Talk’ of ‘Supporting the Troops’ to reduce Scarcity-Conflict threats to National Security; by personally reducing your (i) energy consumption, by “planting victory gardens, cutting down on fuel use, saving scrap metal and old rubber, sacrifices, or maybe just examples of common sense and prudent lifestyle changes”; (ii) procreation factor; by breeding one or less than one child per family; and

[3] Doing what no Corporate ProGrowth Breeding War Politician Terrorist including Nelson Mandela, or any Feminist Terrorist, not even those Sextremist Femen Feminists, ever had the honour or integrity to do: launching Uncivilized Primitivist cultural campaigns – including collaborating with British or NATO Military Intelligence Leaders – to educate citizens to ‘Walk their Talk’ of ‘Supporting their British / Muslim / European / African / Asian / American Troops’ to reduce Scarcity-Conflict threats to National and Global Security; and encourage gender equality by breeding and consuming below carrying capacity?

Sunday, May 26, 2013

UK Media Pretend to Discover the Fraud of Political Psychiatry



British Media Pretend to Discover the Fraud of Political Psychiatry


"There is no such thing as mental illness. Psychiatric diagnosis of 'mental disorders' is just a way of stigmatizing behaviour that society does not want to live with. Psychiatry thrives on coercion and is replacing religion as a form of social control." - Dr. Thomas Szasz


The Times | Daily Mail | 23 May 2013


The Times: Why Britain is hooked on happy pills:

A controversial new book claims psychiatrists are overdiagnosing mental disorders. Prozac-taking Robert Crampton meets its author, James Davies

Two important books on psychiatry will be published later this month. One is the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5, to use the shorthand). DSM-5 is produced by the American Psychiatric Association. First published in 1952, by way of an attempt to standardise previously inconsistent diagnoses of various conditions, the DSM has since become the bible of the psychiatric profession across the world.

The other book is called Cracked. If, in the world of psychiatry, the DSM is Holy Scripture. Cracked is set to become a heretical test.

Monday, May 13, 2013

UNECE-ACCC/C/2013/82: ‘Scarcity & Conflict’ Censorship-Population-Environment-Terrorism Connection



UNECE-ACCC/C/2013/82: ‘Scarcity & Conflict’ Censorship-Population-Environment-Terrorism Connection

The Anarcho-Primitivism / Æquilibriæx CommonSism Sustainable Security (I=PAT) worldview argues that reducing conflict (I: Impact), requires reducing procreation (P: Population) and consumption (A: Affluence) to below carrying capacity levels by returning to a low/no tech sustainable agrarian society.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | EcoFeminist v Breivik | 12 May 2013


On 11 March 2013, Communicant filed a Communication to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, regarding the alleged Non-Compliance by Kingdom of Norway with the obligations under the Aarhus Convention: Denial of Request for Access to Environmental Information from (a) Newspaper Editors, and (b) Bar Association; by Norwegian Environment Appeals Committee and Parliamentary Ombudsman.

The Environmental Information denied to Communicant, by Norwegian Newspaper Editors, the Environmental Appeals Board and Parliamentary Ombudsman, related to the decision-making to censor the Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism-Connection during the Breivik trial: how Mainstream Access-to-Discourse Editors censorship of non-violent scarcity-conflict political grievances and problem solving activism facilitate a scarcity-conflict pressure cooker socio-political reality for their “If it Bleads, It Leads” corporate propaganda profits from the exploding terror of the socio-political scarcity-conflict pressure cooker.

The Environmental Information denied to Communicant, by Norwegian Bar Association, the Environmental Appeals Board and Parliamentary Ombudsman, related to the Bar Association’s refusal to justify their non-Environmental Complaints policy.

On 26 April 2013, the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee ruled that Communicants complaint was “manifestly unreasonable”, without providing any written reasons justifying their ruling of “manifestly unreasonable”.

Monday, April 8, 2013

Norway's Rural Center Party votes to Close Borders to Immigration



Center Party keen to close borders

Center Party leaders failed in their attempts to moderate the demands of their anti-Schengen members, who claim that Norway’s participation in Schengen has resulted in more crime and narcotics entering the country.

April 8, 2013 | News with Views | Nina Berglund


Norway’s rural-oriented Center Party (Senterpartiet, Sp) shocked even its sister party in Sweden over the weekend when it voted to promote withdrawal from the so-called “Schengen agreement” that has opened borders among various European countries. The party also wants to replace Norway’s economic agreement with the European Union, in addition to securing high tariffs and subsidies that protect Norwegian agriculture and keep food prices high.

Center Party leaders failed in their attempts to moderate the demands of their anti-Schengen members, who claim that Norway’s participation in Schengen has resulted in more crime and narcotics entering the country. Led by Sandra Borch of the Center Party’s youth organization and Jenny Klinge, a Member of Parliament on the conservative side of the party, a majority of party members voted to seek withdrawal from Schengen and reinstatement of passport control at all border crossings. They think that will hinder the entry of “organized foreign criminal bands” into Norway.

Sunday, April 7, 2013

ECHR 16325/13: Breivik Necessity Judgement was Discriminatory & Innefective Remedy: Johnstone v. Norway



EU Crt of Human Rights: Case 16325/13 Breivik Necessity Judgement was Discriminatory & Innefective Remedy: Johnstone v. Norway

ECHR: European Court of Human Rights Application: Oslo District Courts Breivik Necessity Judgement is Discriminatory & Ineffective Remedy

Andrea Muhrrteyn | EcoFeminist v Breivik | 07 April 2013


Correspondence from ECHR Registrar: Legal Secretary: Ragna Bjarnadottir, dated 05 March 2013 (Received 07 April 2013)[ECHR Letter-Large]:

ECHR Registrar acknowledges Receipt: Application no. 16325/13: Johnstone v. Norway [Note: Only about 10% of cases submitted to the ECHR are admitted for processing, as 90% of cases filed do not meet all the ECHR admissibility conditions.]

Human Rights Violations complained of:

Discrimination: 24 August 2012: Oslo District Court: Judge Wenche Arntzen: Norway v. Anders Breivik Necessity Judgement

Discrimination and Denied Right to an Effective Remedy: Supreme Court: Secretary General Gunnar Bergby: 10 September 2012 Decision

Discrimination and Denied Right to an Effective Remedy: Parliamentary Ombudsman: Head of Division: Berit Sollie: 15 November 2012 Ruling

The (i) 10 September 2012, administrative decision of Norway Supreme Court Secretary General Gunnar Bergby, denying Applicant Access to Court by refusing to process her 27 August 2012, Application for Review of the Oslo District Court: ‘Breivik Judgement’; and (ii) the 15 November 2012 ruling by Parliamentary Ombudsman, that Secretary General’s Gunnar Bergby’s administrative decision, was a ‘judgement/decision by a court of law’, thereby justifying his refusal to order Secretary General Bergby to process Applicants Application for Review; were (iii) violations of applicants right to an Effective Remedy and (iv) were motivated acts of ideological discrimination against the ‘right wing’ or ‘cultural conservatives’, and against anyone – particularly anyone who is not ‘right wing’ -- who opposes, or objects to Ideological Discrimination against ‘right wing’ (cultural conservatives).

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

How the invasion of immigrants into every corner of England has made a mockery of PM's promise to close the door



How the invasion of immigrants into every corner of England has made a mockery of PM's promise to close the door

The greatest mass migration in our history has taken place | Marxist Revolutionaries of the Sixties to blame for seeing immigrants as allies | Rather than them adapting to their lifestyle, we are adapting to theirs


By Peter Hitchens | Daily Mail.UK | 31 March 2013


Shock: The Lincolnshire town of Boston has seen an influx of immigration form Eastern Europe
Was this Britain? Every group of people I passed was speaking Russian. The shops were full of black bread, pickled cucumbers and vodka, the faces were Slavic. The advertisements in the windows were in the Cyrillic script I had come to know so well when I lived, many years before, in Moscow.

Yet here I was in the shadow of a lovely English Gothic church tower, half-way to dear old Skegness, surrounded by fields of English turnips, leeks and sugar beet, under an English heaven.

This was Boston, Lincolnshire, which I had first seen three decades ago as a somnolent, slightly shabby market town where a kindly traffic warden had found me a parking space, saying: ‘We can always find room for a foreigner.’

In those days, a visitor from London was about as foreign as it got in Boston. Now they were talking Portuguese in the pubs, Polish in the cafes, Latvian and Estonian on the buses. If I had fallen into the river and called out ‘Help!’, I couldn’t even have been sure that anyone would have understood.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Aarhus CCC: Norways Censorship of Media's Population-Environment-Terrorism Connection during Breivik Trial



Aarhus CCC: Norways Censorship of Media's Population-Environment-Terrorism Connection during Breivik Trial

Communication to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee – Alleged Non-Compliance by Kingdom of Norway with the obligations under the Aarhus Convention: Rejection of Request for Access to Environmental Information from (a) Newspaper Editors, and (b) Bar Association; by Norwegian Environment Appeals Committee and Parliamentary Ombudsman.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | EcoFeminist vs. Breivik | 11 March 2013


Overview of Communication:

[1.1] Non-compliance to Access to Information (Article 4 (1) & (7)), by Media Editors: Adresseavisen: Editor: Arne Blix; Aftenposten: Editor: Hilde Haugsgjerd; Bergens Tidende: Editor: Trine Eilertsen; Dagbladet: Editor: John Arne Markussen; NRK: Editor: Hans Tore Bjerkaas; TV2: Editor: Alf Hildrum; VG: Editor: Torry Pedersen.

[1.2] A general failure to implement, or implement correctly, the General (Article 3(1)) and Collection and Dissemination of Environmental Information (Article 5(1)) provisions of the Convention; by the Bar Association (Advokatforeningen): Disciplinary Committee and Disciplinary Board for Advocates (Disiplinærnemnden for advokater).

[1.3] Non-Compliance to Access to Justice (Article 9 (1) & (4)), by the Environmental Appeals Board (Klagenemnda for miljøinformasjon): Erroneous ‘Environmental Information’ definition, Denied Due Process and Effective Remedy.

[1.4] Non-Compliance to Access to Justice (Article 9 (1) & (4)), by the Parliamentary Ombudsman: Denied Due Process & Effective Remedy.

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

White Guilt and Black Fear of Responsibility: A Toxic Devastating Cocktail for Blacks



Victims of the Left: Black Americans



John Perazzo | June 2008 | Discover the Networks

This essay examines specifically how the left, in its self-identified quest to elevate African Americans by means of myriad social justice campaigns, has in fact done incalculable harm to the black community in the United States.

Table of Contents:

1) How the Left Created Black Victimology and Black Rejection of American Values

2) Affirmative Action: How the Left Has Harmed Blacks through the Bigotry of Low Expectations

3) How the Left Consigns Blacks to Substandard Education

4) How the War on Poverty Devastated the Black Community

5) How the Failed Crusade of “Sex Education” Harmed the Black Community

6) The Crime Wave that Has Decimated Black America

7) How Blacks Have Been Victimized by Leftist Policies Concerning AIDS

8) How the Left Demands Black Conformity of Thought

9) Notes

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]

:: Fair Use Notice ::

FAIR USE NOTICE: The Norway v. Breivik blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the EcoFeminist vs. Breivik: Beyond Left and Right Wing: From an ecological perspective, all human economics and politics are irrelevant’ Argument. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to Norway v. Breivik Blog at: [EcoFeminist]