Snowden Judge: Do Nobel Committee, Amnesty Int, Human Rights Watch have Evidence of Ecology of Peace Credibility?
Individuals associated with the (i) Norwegian Nobel Committee; (ii) Amnesty International; (iii) Human Rights Watch have made public alleged ‘Peace’ declarations regarding US v Snowden court proceedings. They are hereby invited to provide the court, prosecution and defence with evidence that their ‘Peace’ declarations were credible MILINT Ecology of Peace declarations. If so, to provide the court with a detailed MILINT Ecology of Peace Analysis of their Members Myfootprint.org Consumption footprint and Procreation footprints, by 17:00 HRS (PST) on 23 July 2013.
Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 20 July 2013
Notice to Norwegian Nobel Committee Nominator Professor Stefan Svallfors; Amnesty International: Executive Committee; Secretary General and International Secretariat; Human Rights Watch: Senior Management and Board of Directors; Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson, US District Court Eastern District of Virginia at Alexandria; United States Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Virginia; John A Kralik Jr, FBI, c/o Valerie Parlave. Asst Dir: FBI-VA: Washington Field Office; Edward J Snowden, c/o Glenn Greenwald, The Guardian; c/o Wikileaks Litigation & Press; President Nicolás Maduro, President of Venezuela; President Vladimir Putin, Kremlin Press Office; Lonnie Snowden, c/o Counsel: Bruce Fein; President Barack Obama, c/o: DNI: James Clapper
Amici Curiae, Andrea Muhrrteyn, an Alien on Pale Blue Dot invitation to (i) Nobel Committee; (ii) Amnesty International; (iii) Human Rights Watch to clarify the MILINT Ecology of Peace; or Civilian War is Peace credibility of their ‘Peace’ public statements in this US v. Snowden matter.