Breivik's 22-07 plan to 'cull' and/or radicalize moderate uncommitted nationalists, who dilute movement by exposing them to a witchhunt
Turn up the heat on the frogs in the multicultural pot! Breivik says its better to turn up the heat sooner, while the light green frogs still in majority in Europe; cause when they are in minority the heat will automatically be turned up, and then it will be too late.
Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 17 April 2012
In December 2011 I wondered whether Breivik's motivations were similar to those of Kazynski, namely that moderates dilute their respective movements and need to be culled. In Are Conservatives/White Racialists who accuse Breivik of being Insane; 'uncommitted right wing types' who dilute the Personal Responsibility movement?, I wrote:Why do so many 'conservatives' who allegedly value the principle of personal responsibility, support Breivik being denied the right to a free and fair trial, to take personal responsibility for his actions? Why are so many 'conservatives' supporting liberal and communist values of shutting anyone up who does not follow their particular method of protest or action, by implementing communist political psychiatry?
Are these outspoken conservatives who are screaming from rooftops about how Breivik is allegedly insane; 'uncommitted rightwing types'; who dilute the movement; as Theodore Kaczynski described 'uncommitted leftwing types' who dilute the movement?
Kaczynski holds that the values of gender equality, pacifism, leisure time etc. while still admirable, are exactly the values of techno-industrial civilization and its promised techno-utopia. Second, he holds that having such an interpretation is counter-productive to the ultimate anti-civilization/anti-tech goal as it attracts "leftist types" who are by nature uncommitted and act to dilute the movement.
Today Breivik admitted that his motivations in enacting 22 July terrorist attacks, were to create a “cull of moderate nationalists. So I have achieved exactly what I hoped for. The goal not for an immediate boost”. Put differently, “July 22nd was to create a witch hunt of moderates.”
AFP/Jakarta Globe:1140 GMT: “I am not a nationalist. I am an ultra-nationalist,” Breivik declares. “The motives of a nationalist are totally different from those of an ultra-nationalist.”
He says his attacks started “a witch hunt” for moderate nationalists -- “exactly what I hoped for”. He says this will lead to more censorship which in turn will lead to radicalisation.
#Breivik if you look at me as a nationalist you are wrong. I am an ultra nationalist. We want to encourage conflict.— Robert Nisbet (@RobNisbetSky) April 17, 2012
#Breivik denies being a nationalist but says he is a super nationalist instead. July 22nd was to create a wit hunt of moderates— Andy Marsh (@andymsky) April 17, 2012
Breivik: 22 July created a 'cull' of moderate nationalists. So I have achieved exactly what I hoped for. The goal not for an immediate boost— Robert Nisbet (@RobNisbetSky) April 17, 2012
#Breivik I think very long term. I will achieve radicalization of nationalists— Robert Nisbet (@RobNisbetSky) April 17, 2012
#Brievik : The more who lose hope the more will be come revoltionaries— Robert Nisbet (@RobNisbetSky) April 17, 2012
#Breivik claims his goal is conflict before natural Europeans become an ethnic minority— Andy Marsh (@andymsky) April 17, 2012
#Breivik understands that only ultra nationalists would be able to understand his motives and methods.— Andy Marsh (@andymsky) April 17, 2012
#breivik: What happened on 22nd of July was cruel but necessary— Robert Nisbet (@RobNisbetSky) April 17, 2012
Moderate Conservatives & Nationalists Responses to being Witch-hunted: To Be, or Not to Be Culled or Radicalized is the Question!
EDL Leader Stephen Lennon (Tommy Robinson) on BBC World Service with Forensic Psychiatrist Dr. Park Dietz who was involved as a forensic psychiatrist in the cases of John Hinckley, Jr., Jeffrey Dahmer, Andrea Yates, Deanna Laney, Susan Smith, Cary Stayner, Polly Klaas, the Menendez Brothers (retrial), John duPont, The Unabomber, the New York Zodiac, the Prom Mom Case and the DC Snipers. Dr. Dietz says he does not think Breivik was inspired by EDL rhetoric, but that he was inspired to act because nobody in the goverment was taking the problem serious enough. Breivik's terrorist act was designed to bring about this trial in order to call the attention of Norway and Europe to a threat that Breivik regards politicians to be apathetic about. (14:58)