Note to Readers:

Summary of Ecology of Peace Problem Solving: The problems of poverty, unemployment, war, crime, violence, food shortages, food price increases, inflation, police brutality, political instability, loss of civil rights, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, racism, sexism, Nazism, Islamism, feminism, Zionism etc; are the ecological overshoot consequences of humans living in accordance to a Masonic War is Peace international law social contract that provides humans the ‘right to breed and consume’ with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits.

Ecology of Peace factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are documented at MILED Clerk Notice.

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Oslo Court denies Breivik’s right to cross-examine Utoya survivor who accuses Breivik of screaming with joy during Utoya Shootings



Norway court denies Breivik’s request to question survivors of Utoya shooting rampage

Associated Press / Washington Post | Updated: Wednesday, May 9, 5:52 PM


OSLO, Norway — Survivors of a youth camp shooting massacre that left 69 people dead in Norway have testified about their panicked attempts to hide during the rampage, as the court turned down confessed gunman Anders Behring Breivik’s request to question them on the stand.

Tonje Brenna, a leading member of the Labor Party’s youth wing, described how she sought shelter behind rocks on the shore of Utoya island on July 22 as her colleagues were shot around her. The 24-year-old told the Oslo court Wednesday she “smelled gunpowder” from her hiding place, “it stung in my eyes.”

Another witness, a local resident, described going out in his boat expecting to be shot as he plucked terrified youths from the water as they tried to swim away from the island.


Survivor of Norway massacre tells court Anders Breivik cried with joy while shooting her friends

Pierre-Henry Deshayes |Agence France-Presse | May 9, 2012 – 12:20 PM ET | Last Updated: May 9, 2012 12:28 PM ET

OSLO — Anders Behring Breivik shouted with joy as he fired off round after round at youngsters on Utoeya, a survivor of his massacre of 69 people on the Norwegian island last July told an Oslo court Wednesday.

Speaking in a clear and decisive voice, Tonje Brenna told the Oslo district court how she heard the killer’s ecstatic shouts as bodies rained around her hiding place in the crevasse of a cliff.

“I am absolutely sure that I heard cries of joy,” testified the 24-year-old head of the ruling Labour Party’s youth wing, AUF, who was the first of the Utoeya survivors to take the stand.

“If I had to spell it out, it would be WOO-HOO. Obviously cries for joy,” she said.

Seated at a table just a few metres from her, Breivik, who has shown virtually no emotion since his trial began on April 16, sat shaking his head in disapproval as Brenna recounted the events of July 22.

The 33-year-old right-wing extremist has insisted that he never laughed or smiled during the massacre, when dressed as a policeman he gunned down 69 mostly teenage particpants at an AUF summer camp on the island.

“Why would I have laughed when I was there? That is not true. It was horrible. I did not smile,” he told the court on April 20.

Breivik has been charged with committing terrorist acts when he first bombed a government building in Oslo on July 22, killing eight people, before heading out to Utoeya.

He has confessed to killing the 77 people who died that day but has refused to plead guilty, insisting the attacks were “cruel but necessary” to stop the Labour Party’s “multicultural experiment” and the “Muslim invasion” of Norway and Europe.

“People were calling home to say farewell to their loved-ones,” Brenna recalled.

The young blonde described the despair that gripped her on July 22, telling the court that the killer at one point had been so close she could smell gunpowder from his weapons and that she thought she would never get off the island alive.

“I thought it was only a question of time. It was impossible to avoid being hit, the shots were coming so rapidly,” she said.

“On every side, people were falling. We could hear people falling into the water and on to the rocks,” she said. “There were calls for help. Mobile phones were ringing continuously.”

Shivering with cold on the rocky shore, survivors tried to raise their morale by whispering to each other: “Tomorrow we will be home and warm and will be watching the Saturday night movie with our parents eating popcorn,” Brenna told the court.

Having been targeted by a killer dressed as a police officer, the youngsters had been so terrified they refused to come out of their hiding place when real police passed near them in a boat, she recalled.

Breivik smiled cryptically several times during Wednesday’s testimony.

Although he is certain to be found guilty, his 10-week trial should determine the question of his sanity.

A first psychiatric evaluation last year concluded the confessed killer was suffering from paranoid schizophrenia, but a second opinion found him of sound mind, and it will ultimately be up to the judges to determine the question of his sanity when they hand down their verdict in July.

If the court finds him sane, Breivik will face Norway’s maximum 21-year prison sentence, but that term can be extended for as long as he is considered a threat to society.

If he is found criminally insane however, he will be sent to a closed psychiatric care unit for treatment.

That is a fate Breivik, who is intent upon showing that his anti-Islam ideology is not the ravings of a lunatic, has described as “worse than death”.

» » » » [Washington Post :: National Post]



No comments:

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]

:: Fair Use Notice ::

FAIR USE NOTICE: The Norway v. Breivik blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the EcoFeminist vs. Breivik: Beyond Left and Right Wing: From an ecological perspective, all human economics and politics are irrelevant’ Argument. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to Norway v. Breivik Blog at: [EcoFeminist]