Letter to EDL & Muslim Council of Britain: MILINT Earth Day analysis of why Cameron’s TERFOR Agenda fails to confront the root causes of Scarcity induced Ethnic Conflict.
Cameron’s TERFOR Agenda fails to confront the root GDP/Growth Agenda causes of Scarcity induced Ethnic Conflict: because the Lord$ of War Profiteer$ from Ethnic Conflict Agenda is fully supported by African and Islamic Breeding War extremists and Western/European Consumption War extremists. Welcome to Civilized Patriarchy’s Human Factory Farming War Economy!!
Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 27 May 2013
Conclusion reached:
Are UK Muslim and British Nationalist Leaders capable of:
[1] Confronting the reality that the Lord$ of War profit from the ethnic/religious/etc conflict resulting from African/Islamic/etc Breeding War civilized patriarchs incapacity or refusal to breed below carrying capacity & Western/etc Consumption War civilized patriarchs incapacity or refusal to consume below carrying capacity; and
[2] Giving Prime Minister David Cameron and his ProGrowth Corporate Lord$ of War Profiteer$ a big ‘F**k You’ by listening to Military Intelligence Leaders who have called for American/World Citizens to ‘Walk their Talk’ of ‘Supporting the Troops’ to reduce Scarcity-Conflict threats to National Security; by personally reducing your (i) energy consumption, by “planting victory gardens, cutting down on fuel use, saving scrap metal and old rubber, sacrifices, or maybe just examples of common sense and prudent lifestyle changes”; (ii) procreation factor; by breeding one or less than one child per family; and
[3] Doing what no Corporate ProGrowth Breeding War Politician Terrorist including Nelson Mandela, or any Feminist Terrorist, not even those Sextremist Femen Feminists, ever had the honour or integrity to do: launching Uncivilized Primitivist cultural campaigns – including collaborating with British or NATO Military Intelligence Leaders – to educate citizens to ‘Walk their Talk’ of ‘Supporting their British / Muslim / European / African / Asian / American Troops’ to reduce Scarcity-Conflict threats to National and Global Security; and encourage gender equality by breeding and consuming below carrying capacity?
Letter to EDL & Muslim Council of Britain: MILINT Earth Day analysis of why Cameron’s TERFOR Agenda fails to confront the root causes of Scarcity induced Ethnic Conflict.
| TO: Sec. Gen. Mr. Farooq Murad Muslim Council of Britain TO: Islamic Sharia Council CC: Prime Minister David Cameron 10 Downing Street, London, SW1A 2AA c/o: Secretary of Def: Philip Hammond CC: Global Security Experts: Climate Change is a Global Security Threat | TO: Tommy Robinson English Defense League (EDL) TO: Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain CC: Gen. Sir David Richards Chief of the Defence Staff C/O: Defence Secretary Group CC: NATO & Global Military Advisory Council on Climate Change (GMACCC) |
MILINT Earth Day analysis of why Cameron’s TERFOR Agenda fails to confront the root causes of Scarcity induced Ethnic Conflict.
Cameron’s TERFOR Agenda fails to confront the root GDP/Growth Agenda causes of Scarcity induced Ethnic Conflict: because the Lord$ of War Profiteer$ from Ethnic Conflict Agenda is fully supported by African and Islamic Breeding War extremists and Western/European Consumption War extremists. Welcome to Civilized Patriarchy’s Human Factory Farming War Economy!!
Civilized Patriarchy: where Lord$ of War profit from the ethnic/religious/etc conflict resulting from – generally speaking – African/Islamic/etc Breeding War civilized patriarchs incapacity to breed below carrying capacity & Western/etc Consumption War civilized patriarchs incapacity to consume below carrying capacity.
________________________________________
Understanding the Religion of Civilized Patriarchy’s Human Factory Farming War Economy
Definition of Religion: Group-Shared System of Thought and Action that Offers the Individual a Frame of Orientation and an Object of Devotion:
“To clarify, “religion” as I use it here does not refer to a system that has necessarily to do with a concept of God or with idols or even to a system perceived as religion, but to any group-shared system of thought and action that offers the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion. Indeed, in this broad sense of the world no culture of the past or present, and it seems no culture in the future, can be considered as not have religion.
This definition does not tell us anything about its specific content. People may worship animals, trees, idols of gold or stone, an invisible god, a saintly person, or a diabolical leader; they may worship their ancestors, their nation, their class or party, money or success. Their religion may be conducive to the development of destructiveness or of love, of domination or of solidarity; it may further their power of reason or paralyze it.
.. A specific religion, provided it is effective in motivating conduct, is not a sum total of doctrines and beliefs; it is rooted in a specific character structure of the individual and, inasmuch as it is the religion of a group, in the social character. Thus, our religious attitude may be considered an aspect of our character structure, for we are what we are devoted to, and what we are devoted to is what motivates our conduct. Often however, individuals are not even aware of the real objects of their personal devotion and mistake their “official” beliefs for their real, though secret religion. If, for instance, a man worships power while professing a religion of love, the religion of power is his secret religion, while his so-called official religion, for example Christianity, is only an ideology.” – Erich Fromm, To Have or to Be, pp.135-136
Civilized Patriarchy’s Breeding / Consumption War Frame of Orientation and Objects of Devotion:
‘Civilized’ Patriarchy (pa•tri•arch•y):
A system of society or government, is Patriarchal to the extent that it regulates (a) the relations between humans, nature and other animals species and (b) the relations between humans amongst themselves, in terms of their gender, culture, ethnic, religious and ideological conflicts; for the (c) almost exclusive benefit of violent Anthropocentric humans and corporations.
Consequently a legal, political or social system is Patriarchal to the extent of its (a) failure to provide automatic equal legal personhood and rights to women, nature and animal and plant species; (b) disregard for the objective and scientific breed and consume below carrying capacity truth of the laws of nature/ecology; and (c) disregard for the laws of human nature; when they contradict the AnthroCorpocentric – breeding and consumption war – objectives of the holders of subjective AnthroCorpocentric Truth.
A society has violent Patriarchal breeding and consumption war objectives, to the extent that:
• its socio-political status symbols involve breeding war, consumption war and violent warrior mythology: (a) breeding war procreation above carrying capacity: i.e. cultures that reward their male members with concepts of manhood virility status, which are based on the man breeding a family above carrying capacity levels; (b) consumption war consuming above carrying capacity; i.e. cultures that reward their male members with concepts of manhood intelligence/virility status, which are based upon the man consuming above carrying capacity levels, to demonstrate his ‘large consumption penis’; (c) warrior mythology, where violent men are rewarded with ‘freedom fighter’ or ‘soldier’ socio-political status symbol medals and awards; particularly if the warrior mythology censors and ignores information to educate the culture’s members, that scarcity induced resource war violence can be avoided by the culture’s members choosing to breed and consume below carrying capacity levels. A culture which teaches a purely defensive warrior mythology; i.e. based purely on defense of its landbase and resources, i.e. which educate the members of the culture to avoid overpopulation and overconsumption scarcity inducing lifestyle’s within its culture, and hence does not engage in patriarchal breeding and consumption war objectives would not be considered a patriarchal culture.
• Its religious, political and corporate leaders (a) endorse patriarchal objectification and sexualized concepts of ‘beauty’, which demean and vilify all women who do not meet those ‘beauty’ requirements; where a woman’s value is not based on her honesty, character and integrity, but upon how well she is able to market and trade her sexuality for physical and economic safety and security, and (b) avoid addressing the overpopulation and overconsumption scarcity induced root causes of most direct and indirect causes of conflict: from murder, rape, suicide, homeless, unemployment, courts, police, prisons, mental illness, mental institutions, because cumulatively they serve as socio-political conflict pressure cookers to socio-psychologically pressure women to (i) purchase safety and security by trading sexual favours from men, for physical and economic safety and security; (ii) conform to civilized patriarchy’s expectation that she behave as her partners brood sow and/or sexual socio-economic status symbol bimbo accessory, to breed/consume above carrying capacity, to thereby (iii) aggravate scarcity induced violence, particularly against lower class men and women.
________________________________________
MILINT Earth Day Correspondence & TERFOR Chronology of Events: Notice’s & Correspondence related to Military Necessity Justification for Implementing Temporary Sustainable Security Coup d’état De-Industrialization:
Copies of all documents and various acknowledged receipts available at MILINT Earth Day (and navyjag-humint.co.nr).
03 May: MILINT Earth Day Petition to White House (wh.gov/zjyC):
Avoid a Coup d’état, by implementing Sustainable Security Relocalization, De-Industrialization and Primitivization.
We demand Sustainable Security Relocalization, Decentralization, De-Industrialization and Primitivization policies, by 22 April 2014 - 09:11 GMT; & turning off all coal, nuclear & fossil fuel sources to the National Grid on 22 April 2015.
If we are too few or ignored; we call on the US Military to participate in worldwide simultaneous temporary Coup d'état's; to enact Sustainable Security Constitutions (a ‘SusSec Licence to Vote’ policy).
If we fail, we confront the extermination of humanity, by 2100, due to runaway feedback confluence of ecological tipping points.
Our failure to act by 2014/15; will aggravate the runaway feedback confluence, rendering it impossible & futile to act later.
"We've got to act now.” – Gen. Wesley Clark, NATO '96-99
04 May: USA: Joint Chiefs of Staff: General Dempsey & WH. Pres. Obama:
General Martin Dempsey: Chairman: Joint Chiefs of Staff; c/o: Colonel Mark Lee USAEC; U.S. Army Environmental Command and President Barak Obama, c/o: Ms. Virginia Palmer, Charge D'Affaires USA Embassy, c/o: Dir Nat. Intel: James Clapper: JCS Dempsey & WH Obama MILINT Necessity of Coup d'etat to implement Sustainable Security Policies.
05 May: Russia: Russian Army: Gen. Shoygu & President Putin:
President Putin and Sergey Kuzhugetovich Shoygu, General of the Russian Army; CC & c/o: Commanders of: Land Forces; Air Force; Navy; Strategic Missile Forces; Air and Space Defense; Airborne Troops; W. Military Dist. S. Military Dist.; E. Military Dist.; N. Fleet; Pacific Fleet; Baltic Fleet; Black Sea Fleet: Pres Putin & Gen Shoygu: MILINT Necessity of Coup d'etat to implement Sustainable Security Policies.
05 May: Help from FBI-Miami:
Correspondence with FBI-Miami who responded to RE: JCS Dempsey & WH Obama: MILINT Necessity of Coup d'etat to implement Sustainable Security Policies; with “How can the FBI help you?”
06 May: United Kingdom: Gen. Richards & PM Cameron:
Gen. Sir David Richards, Chief of the Defence Staff; Gen Nicholas Houghton: VC of Defence; Adm George Zamebellas: Chief Navy; Gen Peter Wall: Chief Gen. Staff; Marshall Stephen Dalton: Air Chief; Gen Richard Barrons: Joint Forces Command; Prime Minister David Cameron; c/o: Secretary of Def: Philip Hammond; Min Armed Forces: Andrew Robathan; Sec State: Defense Spokesman: Lord Astor of Hever; Secretary of Energy & Climate Change: Edward Davey. PM Cameron & Gen D.Richards: MILINT Necessity of Coup d'etat to implement Sustainable Security Policies
07 May: Correspondence: UKIP: MEP: Roger Helmer:
Correspondence with UKIP MEP Roger Helmer: Primitive Feminist's MILINT Earth Day Coup d'etat Correspondence with UKIP Climate Change Skeptic MEP: Roger Helmer Re: 1. Obsessive: “excessive in degree or nature”; 2. Realistic view of the likely impact of my actions.
08 May: News: Prince Charles: Urgency of Climate Change Action:
Speaking at a conference for scientists at St James’ Palace in London, which included Owen Paterson, the Conservative Secretary of State for the Environment, Ed Davey, the Lib Dem secretary of state for energy and climate (both of whom received the MILINT Earth Day Notices on 06 May) and Lord Stern
09 May: NATO: Mil. Comm: Bartels & Sec. Gen. Rasmussen:
NATO Member Chief of Defence: AL: Maj. Gen. Xhemal Gjunkshi; BE: Maj. Gen. Eddy Testelmans; BG: Gen. Simeon Simeonov; CA: Gen. Thomas Lawson; HR: Gen. Drago Lovric; CZ: Lt. Gen. Petr Pavel; DK: Gen. Peter Bartram; EE: Maj. Gen. Riho Terras; FR: Gen. Bertrand Ract-Madoux; DE: Gen. Volker Wieker; GR: Gen. Michail Kostarakos; HU: Gen. Tibor Benko; IS: R.Adm. Georg Larusson; IT: Gen. Biagio Abrate; LV: Brig. Gen. Juris Zeibarts; LT: Lt. Gen. Arvydas Pocius; LU: Col. Mario Daubenfield; NL: Gen. Tom Middendorp; NO: Gen. Harald Sunde; PL: Gen. Mieczyslaw Cieniuch; PT: Gen. Luis Pinto; RO: Lt. Gen. Stefan Danila; SK: Gen. Peter Vojtek; SI: Brig. Dobran Bozic; Gen. Fernando Garcia Sanchez; TK: Gen. Necdet Ozel; UK: Gen. David Richards; JCS: Gen. Martin Dempsey; c/o & via: NATO Military Committee: Knud Bartels.
NATO Member Commander in Chief: AL: Pres. Bujar Nishani; BE: PM: Elio Di Rupo; BG: Pres. Rosen Plevneliev; CA: PM. Stephen Harper; HR: Pres. Ivo Josipovic; CZ: Pres. Milos Zeman; DK: Queen Margrethe; EE: PM: Andrus Ansip; FR: Pres. Francois Hollande; DE: Chanc. Angela Merkel; GR: Pres. Karolos Papoulias; HU: Pres. Janos Ader; IS: Pres: Olafur Ragnar Grimsson; IT: Pres. Giorgio Napolitano; LV: Andris Berzins; LT: Pres. Dalia Grybauskaite; LU: PM: Jean-Claude Juncker; NL: King Willem-Alexander; NO: King Harald V; PL: Pres. Bronislaw Komorowski; PT: Pres. Anibal Cavaco Silva; RO: Pres. Traian Basescu; SK: Pres. Ivan Gasparovic; SI: Pres. Borut Pahor; ES: King Juan Carlos I; TR: Pres. Abdullah Gul; UK: Queen Elizabeth II; US: President Barack Obama; c/o: NATO Sec. Gen. Andres Foch Rasmussen.
10 May: Climate Change Global Military Advisory Council:
Copies of NATO MILINT Necessity of Coup d'etat to implement Sustainable Security Policies, sent to: Global Military Advisory Council on Climate Change (GMACCC): RNLMC Kees Homan; BIPSS: Maj.Gen. ANM Muniruzzaman; Maj. Piet Wit; Lt General Bala Nanda Sharma.
14 May: United Nations visit to MILINT Earth Day:
Repeated visits by United Nation Official to Milint Earth Day website.
14 May: News: Pentagon Legal Coup d’etat Preparations:
Legal Preparations for MILINT Necessity of Sustainable Security Coup d'etat to protect Constitution from Eco-Illiterate Voters & Politicians
A defense official who declined to be named takes a different view of the rule, claiming, “The authorization has been around over 100 years; it’s not a new authority. It’s been there but it hasn’t been exercised. This is a carryover of domestic policy.” ... Nevertheless, he says, “every person in the military swears an oath of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States to defend that Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.”
15 May: DECC: Min. Climate Change: Gregory Barker:
Correspondence with DECC: Dept Energy & Climate Change & Minister of State for Climate Change: Rt. Hon. Gregory Barker Primitive Feminist's MILINT Earth Day Coup d'état Correspondence with DECC: Minister of State for Climate Change. PS: Pentagon make Legal Preparations for MILINT Necessity of Coup d'etat to implement Sustainable Security Policies; and protect Constitution from Eco-Illiterate Voters and Politicians.
16 May: Pres. Obama: ‘Mutant’s Climate Change Suicide’ Tweet:
Pres Obama tweets about the styd by Australian John Cook, an expert in climate change communication: "Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous. Read more: http://OFA.BO/gJsdFp"
Mutant Message Down Under is about an American woman who goes on a 4 month walkabout through the Outback, with nomadic Aboriginals, who call themselves the "Real People". She learns a new ecologically centred way of life, their methods of healing, decision to commit tribal suicide, and the wisdom of their 50,000-year-old culture; experiencing a dramatic personal transformation.
22 May 2013: Woolwich Murder of Drummer Lee Rigby:
At 14:20 hrs on the afternoon of 22 May 2013, Lee Rigby, a British Army soldier and a Drummer of the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, was killed by two attackers – allegedly Michael Olumide Adebolajo, age 28, and Michael Oluwatobi Adebowale, age 22 – in Wellington Street, near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, south-east London.
Rigby was off duty and walking along Wellington Street when the attack occurred. The two men ran him down with a car, then used knives and a cleaver to stab and hack him to death. The men then dragged Rigby's body onto the road. The two attackers, who remained at the scene until police arrived, told passers-by that they had killed a soldier to avenge the killing of Muslims by the British military. Armed police arrived at the scene 14 minutes after initial emergency calls, shot both the assailants, apprehended them, and took them to separate hospitals. Both men are British of Nigerian descent who were raised as Christians and converted to Islam.
Michael Olumide Adebolajo made the following statement to a bystander about his justification for the attack, which was captured on video by the same bystander at the scene:
"The only reason we have killed this man today is because Muslims are dying daily by British soldiers, and this British soldier is one, is a eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. By Allah, we swear by the Almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you until you leave us alone. So what if we want to live by the Sharia in Muslim lands. Why does that mean you must follow us and chase us and call us extremists and kill us? Rather you lot are extreme. You are the ones. When you drop a bomb, do you think it hits one person or rather your bomb wipes out a whole family. This is the reality. By Allah, if I saw your mother today with a buggy I would help her up the stairs. This is my nature. But we are forced by the Qur'an in Sura at-Tawba [Chapter 9 of the Qur'an], through many, many ayah [verses] throughout the Qur'an that [say] we must fight them as they fight us, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. I apologise that women had to witness this today, but in our land our women have to see the same. You people will never be safe. Remove your governments. They don't care about you. Do you think David Cameron is gonna get caught in the street when we start busting our guns? Do you think the politicians are going to die? No it's going to be the average guy, like you, and your children. So get rid of them. Tell them to bring our troops back so we can..., so you can all live in peace. Leave our lands and you will live in peace. That's all I have to say. Allah's peace and blessings be upon Muhammad, as-salamu alaykum."
Michael Olumide Adebolajo Provides 2 Reasons for Killing Rigby:
1. British Soldiers are Killing Muslims in Muslim lands
2. The Koran commands Muslims to fight those who make mischief in Muslim lands.
“What’s the penalty for making mischief in a Muslim land? If it is something serious, the penalty is death. Who was Lee Rigby? He was a machine gunner in the British Army. He had a tour in Afghanistan and more recently he was recruiting more soldiers to go to places like Afghanistan. By the way bringing a Non-Muslim military into a Muslim land to interfere in Muslim affairs is the most extreme form of mischief making. According to Islam, the penalty is death. The Koran even tells Muslims how to kill in order to spread fear. In Sura 8:12 it says “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.” Don't just kill them, mutilate them. But -- according to Cameron -- Rigby's beheading and mutilation had nothing to do with the Islam. How could it be any simpler. There are only two ingredients in this recipe for terror. Take one cup of the Koran and add one spoon of mischief making and stir together and wait for the attack. So Mayor Johnson, saying that the teachings of Islam and British soldiers fighting in Afghanistan had nothing to do with the massacre of Lee Rigby is like saying that flower and sugar had nothing to do with the biscuits you were probably munching on for your afternoon tea, while Rigby was being slaughtered like an animal in the city that elected you mayor.
[..] Mr. Cameron instead of using your position to promote open discussion about the ideology of Islam [and the West's Corporate Pro-Growth Overconsumption Oil-War Agenda for Britain’s mischief making in Muslim lands] you use it to tell millions of people that anyone who obeys the Koran's clear commands to kill has somehow betrayed the religion that ordered him to kill [those who make mischief in Muslim lands]. There's definitely a betrayal here Prime Minister Cameron, but its not a betrayal of Islam.” - Jihad Returns to London: A Reply to David Cameron
23 May 2013: MILINT Earth Day Complaint to MI5: Corporate Pro-Growth Agenda a Threat to Global Security: i.e. an aggravation of the Climate Change Scarcity-Conflict Death Spiral on Steroids National Security Threat.
Complaint to MI5: Bribery & Threat to National Security: Corporate Pro-Growth Agenda Conspiracy to Profit from bribing the public to engage in Unsustainable Scarcity-Conflict Procreation, Consumption and Production behaviour; by ignoring the role of GDP/economic growth and energy consumption’s aggravation of the Climate Change Scarcity-Conflict Death Spiral on Steroids National Security Threat. (Complaint PDF) (Affid PDF)
Conclusion: The longer the propagandists, legislators and profiteers of the Pro-Growth Agenda, avoid being held accountable for how their Pro-Growth agenda of Unsustainable Scarcity-Conflict Procreation, Consumption and Production, GDP/economic growth and industrialized energy consumption is massively aggravating the Climate Change Scarcity-Conflict Death Spiral on Steroids National Security Threat; the greater the military necessity urgency and justifications for implementing Temporary De-Industrialization and Sustainable Security Constitution Coup d’etat’s.
Bribery & Threat to National Security Charges against: Roland Rudd: Chair: Business for New Europe; Dame Helen Alexander: Chair: UBM; Sir Win Bischoff: Chair: Lloyds Banking Group; Sir Richard Branson: Founder: Virgin Group; Sir Roger Carr: Chair: Centrica; Sir Andrew Cahn: Vice-Chair: Nomura; David Cruickshank: Chair: Deloitte LLP; Lord Davies of Abersoch: Vice-Chair: Corsair Capital; Guy Dawson: Dir: ASA International; Lord Kerr of Kinlochard: Dep.Chair: Scottish Power; Sir Adrian Montague: Chair: 3i; Nicolas Petrovic: CEO: Eurostar; Sir Michael Rake: Chair: BT; Anthony Salz: Vice-Chair: Rothschild; Sir Nicholas Scheele: Chair: Key Safety Systems Inc; Sir Nigel Sheinwald: Dir: Shell; Sir Martin Sorr elL: CEO: WPP; Malcolm Sweeting: Snr.Partner: Clifford Chance; Bill Winters: CEO Renshaw Bay. Corporate Media: Independent: Editor: Chris Blackhurst & Grp Mng Ed: Doug Wills: Independent Print Ltd, 2 Derry Street, London W8 5HF. Re: Letters: The benefit of European Union membership outweighs the cost. DailyMail: Editor: Paul Dacre, Mng Dir: Guy Zitter: Northcliffe House, 2 Derry Street, London, W8 5TT: Re: Every family would be up £3,500 worse off if Britain left the EU, business chiefs warn. Telegraph: Editor: Andrew Gilligan: 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 0DT: Re: 'Economic case to stay in EU is overwhelming', say business leaders.
25 May 2013: Cameron announces establishment of Tackling Extremism and Radicalisation Task Force (TERFOR)
EXCLUSIVE: 'I will gag the hate clerics': Cameron to launch new terror task force to bring an end to religious extremism
[..] Government insiders say Mr Cameron’s new TERFOR group is intended to ‘disrupt’ the activities of extremist clerics wherever they preach their ‘hateful message’.
One said: ‘We are looking at the range of powers and current methods of dealing with extremism at its root, as opposed to just tackling criminal violent extremism.
‘And we will look at ways of disrupting individuals who may be influential in fostering extremism.
‘We cannot allow a situation to continue where extremist clerics go around this country inciting young people to commit terrorist acts.
Prime Minister Cameron’s Support for -- Mischief Making Resource theft colonization of Muslim lands, Corporate Multiculti aggravation of Ethnic-Conflict Colonization of European lands – Lord$-of-Ethnic-Conflict/War-Profiteer$ Terrorism:
In 2010, when Prime Minister Cameron was asked which living person he most admires, the Tory leader said it was Nelson Mandela, 'the freedom fighter who led South Africa’s liberation struggle'. According to Cameron:
Muslims who obey the Koran and fight back against British Forces making mischief in their Muslim lands are ‘terrorists’!
» Violent Resistance to ProGrowth Multiculti Corporatism Mischief Making Oil Wars in Muslim Lands is ‘terrorism’!
Europeans like Breivik who obey the principles of International law and fight back against ProGrowth Multiculti Corporate Colonialists and Muslim immigrants making mischief to colonize their European lands are ‘terrorists’!
» Violent Resistance to ProGrowth Multiculti Corporatism Colonizing Mischief Making Multiculti Ethnic Conflict Wars in European lands are terrorists!
Multiculturalism: How, then, does the universe of Capital relate to the form of Nation State in our era of global capitalism? Perhaps, this relationship is best designated as ‘auto-colonization’: with the direct multinational functioning of Capital, we are no longer dealing with the standard opposition between metropolis and colonized countries; a global company as it were cuts its umbilical cord with its mother-nation and treats its country of origins as simply another territory to be colonized. This is what disturbs so much the patriotically oriented right-wing populists, from Le Pen to Buchanan: the fact that the new multinationals have towards the French or American local population exactly the same attitude as towards the population of Mexico, Brazil or Taiwan. Is there not a kind of poetic justice in this self-referential turn? Today’s global capitalism is thus again a kind of ‘negation of negation’, after national capitalism and its internationalist/colonialist phase. At the beginning (ideally, of course), there is capitalism within the confines of a Nation-State, with the accompanying international trade (exchange between sovereign Nation-States); what follows is the relationship of colonization in which the colonizing country subordinates and exploits (economically, politically, culturally) the colonized country; the final moment of this process is the paradox of colonization in which there are only colonies, no colonizing countries—the colonizing power is no longer a Nation-State but directly the global company. In the long term, we shall all not only wear Banana Republic shirts but also live in banana republics.
And, of course, the ideal form of ideology of this global capitalism is multiculturalism, the attitude which, from a kind of empty global position, treats each local culture the way the colonizer treats colonized people—as ‘natives’ whose mores are to be carefully studied and ‘respected’. That is to say, the relationship between traditional imperialist colonialism and global capitalist self-colonization is exactly the same as the relationship between Western cultural imperialism and multiculturalism: in the same way that global capitalism involves the paradox of colonization without the colonizing Nation-State metropole, multiculturalism involves patronizing Eurocentrist distance and/or respect for local cultures without roots in one’s own particular culture. In other words, multiculturalism is a disavowed, inverted, self-referential form of racism, a ‘racism with a distance’—it ‘respects’ the Other’s identity, conceiving the Other as a self-enclosed ‘authentic’ community towards which he, the multiculturalist, maintains a distance rendered possible by his privileged universal position.
Multiculturalism is a racism which empties its own position of all positive content (the multiculturalist is not a direct racist, he doesn’t oppose to the Other the particular values of his own culture), but nonetheless retains this position as the privileged empty point of universality from which one is able to appreciate (and depreciate) properly other particular cultures—the multiculturalist respect for the Other’s specificity is the very form of asserting one’s own superiority.
African National Congress Cadres who relied on the principles of International law and fought against Apartheid Forces making mischief in African lands are ‘freedom fighters’ involved in a liberation struggle!
» Violent Resistance to Boer Anti-Imperialist’s Mischief Making of introducing Separatist Multiculturalism and urging urgent population control policies to avoid Resource scarcity and Ethnic Conflict; are ‘freedom fighters’!
Prime Minister Cameron’s ProGrowth Corporate Agenda ‘Fuck You’ to Military Intelligence Leaders who have called for American/World Citizens to ‘Walk their Talk’ of ‘Supporting the Troops’ to reduce Scarcity-Conflict threats to National Security; by massively reducing their energy consumption, by – for example - “planting victory gardens, cutting down on fuel use, saving scrap metal and old rubber, sacrifices, or maybe just examples of common sense and prudent lifestyle changes.”
“A yellow ribbon on a car or truck is a wonderful message of symbolic support for our troops. I’d like to see the American people take it several steps further. If you say a yellow ribbon is the ‘talk,’ then being energy efficient is the ‘walk’. A yellow ribbon on a big, gas-guzzling SUV is a mixed message. We need to make better energy choices in our homes, businesses and transportation, as well as to support our leaders in making policies that change the way we develop and use energy. If we Americans truly embrace this idea, it is a triple win: it reduces our dependence on foreign oil, it reduces our impact on the climate and it makes our nation much more secure.” - Vice-Admiral Dennis V. McGinn, Powering America’s Defense: Energy and the Risks to National Security; Center for Naval Analysis, CAN Military Advisory Board
Powering America’s Defense: Energy and the Risks to National Security; Center for Naval Analysis, CAN Military Advisory Board:
• Vice Admiral Dennis V. McGinn, USN (Ret); Former Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Requirements and Programs:
• General Charles F. “Chuck” Wald, USAF (Ret.): Former Deputy Commander, Headquarters U.S. European Command (USEUCOM); Chairman, CNA Military Advisory Board
• General Charles G. Boyd, USAF (Ret.): Former Deputy Commander in Chief of U.S. Forces in Europe
• Lieutenant General Lawrence P. Farrell Jr., USAF (Ret.): Former Deputy Chief of Staff for Plans and Programs, Headquarters U.S. Air Force
• General Paul J. Kern, USA (Ret.): Former Commanding General, U.S. Army Materiel Command
• General Ronald E. Keys USAF (Ret.): Former Commander, Air Combat Command
• Admiral T. Joseph Lopez, USN (Ret.): Former Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Naval Forces Europe and of Allied Forces, Southern Europe
• Admiral T. Joseph Lopez, USN (Ret.): Former Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Naval Forces Europe and of Allied Forces, Southern Europe
• Vice Admiral Dennis V. McGinn, USN (Ret.): Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Warfare Requirements and Programs
• Admiral John B. Nathman, USN (Ret.): Former Vice Chief of Naval Operations
• Rear Admiral David R. Oliver, Jr., USN (Ret.): Former Principal Deputy to the Navy Acquisition Executive
• General Gordon R. Sullivan, USA (Ret.): Former Chief of Staff, U.S. Army; Former Chairman, CNA Military Advisory Board
• Vice Admiral Richard H. Truly, USN (Ret.): Former NASA Administrator, Shuttle Astronaut and the first Commander of the Naval Space Command
Vice Admiral Dennis McGinn; Energy, Climate Change, and the Military: Implications for National Security; Woodrow Wilson Center for Environmental Security:
“Global climate change will pose serious threats to water supplies and agricultural production, leading to mass migration in some cases. At the same time we will see an increasing demand for a dwindling supply of fossil fuels. These factors mean and intense competition for key and vital resources, around the globe and that leads to conflict.
“This report is different to many other reports, involving military leaders. That is because in it, we make a direct appeal to the American people. We talk in this report about the amazing sacrifices the American people made during World War II, planting victory gardens, cutting down on fuel use, saving scrap metal and old rubber, sacrifices, or maybe just examples of common sense and prudent lifestyle changes. Whatever you call them, the steps taken by the American people then, shortened the war and saved lives.
And I believe the same can be said today about these challenges of energy security and climate security. There are individual steps that every American can take. Using less energy. Being more efficient with the energy that we do use. Supporting new policies to help our country take a new energy path. These are the steps that can help us avoid, or shorten wars in the future. Those wars over competition for vital resources. These are steps that can save lives. They may cost money yes, but if we don't spend the money now, we will still pay, and we will pay much more later. In fact, we'll pay in American lives lost.
American civilians played an important role in World War II because they understood the stakes and because they were asked to do so. General Wald made the stakes clear, and our report makes the stakes clear. Our current energy posture poses a significant and urgent threat to our national security, militarily, economically and diplomatically.
Hopefully more Americans will understand these stakes, and that these consequences will affect them. Hopefully more Americans will hear the very direct request from our Commander in Chief and from this small group of a dozen retired Admirals and Generals.
The American people, all of us, through our energy choices can contribute directly to the security of our nation. It is a triple win. It makes us energy independent. It reduces our effect on the environment, and it makes our nation very much more secure.”
James Woolsey, Former CIA Director; Climate Change and National Security:
“I was testifying before a House Committee a few months ago and one of the members was very sceptical of climate change and was arguing with me, because I presented some of the reasons why I thought climate change was a serious problem, and I finally said "Congressman look, set aside climate change, do you realize that seven of the nine things that I've suggested will help us be allot more resilient against terrorism or oil cut-offs." And he said, "Oh if you are doing them for that reason, then its fine."”
James Woolsey (19 October 2009): How your Gas Money Funds Terrorism, American Jewish Committee, Washington DC.:
“The author of the fine book The Looming Tower, about Al'Qaeda and 9/11, Laurence Wright, writes for the New Yorker, has a fascinating sentence in the Looming Tower. He says that with a little over 1% of the worlds Muslims, Saudi's control about 90% of the worlds Islamic Institutions. Now what does that mean to the rest of us? Wahaabi Islam, the religion of Saudi Arabia, if you read the Imam's Fatwa's, rather than what they say to us, the Fatwa's are somewhere between murderous and genocidal with respect to their discussion of Shiite Muslims, Jews, homosexuals and apostates. They are massively oppressive of women in many, many ways. They are focussed on the establishment of a worldwide Caliphate, a theocratic dictatorship. That is essentially Al'Qaeda's doctrine. There is no substantive difference between Al'Qaeda and the Wahaabi's of Saudi Arabia want to take us. The question is 'Who's in charge'? So its somewhat like the feud between the Trotskyites and the Stalinists in the 1920's and 30's. Because the reach of Wahaabi Madrassas is so great, you have all over Pakistan, as well as the West Bank and in allot of other parts of the world, little boys being taught hatred essentially. Now that produces a situation in which by shelling out essentially a billion dollars a day at seventy dollars a barrel of oil, for imported oil, and since allot of that money goes to the Middle East, you and I shouldn't have any question about who is paying for the other side of this long war that we are in. If you want to know who is paying for those Madrassas in Pakistan or the West Bank to teach those little boys to hate, just next time you go to a filling station, before you get out to charge your gasoline and credit card, turn the rear-view mirror just a few inches, so you are looking into your own eyes. Now you know who is paying for those little boys to be taught to hate. The situation we have with the Wahaabi's of Saudi Arabia is not too far from what would be the case if Ferdinand and Isabella and Torquemada running the Spanish Inquisition were still around in Spain and Spain drilled down and found 25% of the worlds oil under Spain. Ferdinand and Isabella turn to Torquemada and they say "We know that you like to pick the pope and pick the head of the Lutherans and the Evangelicals and the President of Notre Dame and that’s all fine with us, here's six, seven, eight billion dollars a year, just go to it. That’s the kind of problem the world, would hypothetically have if Torquemada and the Inquisition were still around and that’s the kind of problem we've got with the Wahaabi's of Saudi Arabia.”
Conclusion:
Are UK Muslim and British Nationalist Leaders capable of:
[1] Confronting the reality that the Lord$ of War profit from the ethnic/religious/etc conflict resulting from African/Islamic/etc Breeding War civilized patriarchs incapacity or refusal to breed below carrying capacity & Western/etc Consumption War civilized patriarchs incapacity or refusal to consume below carrying capacity; and
[2] Giving Prime Minister David Cameron and his ProGrowth Corporate Lord$ of War Profiteer$ a big ‘Fuck You’ by listening to Military Intelligence Leaders who have called for American/World Citizens to ‘Walk their Talk’ of ‘Supporting the Troops’ to reduce Scarcity-Conflict threats to National Security; by personally reducing your (i) energy consumption, by “planting victory gardens, cutting down on fuel use, saving scrap metal and old rubber, sacrifices, or maybe just examples of common sense and prudent lifestyle changes”; (ii) procreation factor; by breeding one or less than one child per family; and
[3] Doing what no Corporate ProGrowth Breeding War Politician Terrorist including Nelson Mandela, or those Sextremist Femen Feminists, ever had the honour or integrity to do: launching Uncivilized Primitivist cultural campaigns – including collaborating with British or NATO Military Intelligence Leaders – to educate citizens to ‘Walk their Talk’ of ‘Supporting their British / Muslim / European / African / Asian / American Troops’ to reduce Scarcity-Conflict threats to National and Global Security; and encourage gender equality by breeding and consuming below carrying capacity?
Dated at George, South Africa, Pale Blue Dot: 27 May 2013
» » » » [TYGAE MILINT Earth Day]
No comments:
Post a Comment