NO v. Breivik :: Uncensored: * Media: Ed Letters: Errors

Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Problem Solving: Poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc; are some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources.

Ecology of Peace RH factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate & sign their responsible freedom oaths; to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as international law; to require all citizens of all races, religions and nations to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are updated at EoP MILED Clerk.

Showing posts with label * Media: Ed Letters: Errors. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

AU Press Council Ruling: Sydney Morning Herald Breivik Case Inaccuracy

AU Press Council Ruling: Sydney Morning Herald Breivik Case Inaccuracy

Australian Press Council Refuse to Accept Complaint from Individuals 'Overseas'

22 October 2012 | AU Press Council | Sydney Morning Herald

The Complaint submitted to Australian Press Council (APC) against Sydney Morning Herald: 08 September 2012 Article: No Breivik Appeal as Case Formally Ends: Error: The case has not ‘formally ended’.

Relief Requested in terms of General Statement of Principles: (2) Correction of inaccuracy & (3) Publishing responses

[1] 27 August Application to Supreme Court for Review of Breivik Judgement.
[2] Notifications to Norwegian Foreign Press Association (FPA)

The Norwegian Foreign Press Association as well as all their members, which include journalists from Reuters, Agence France Presse (AFP), Associated Press (AP), Al Arabija, Al Jazeera, BBC, Bloomberg, Globe and Mail, Xinhua, Die Welt, Irish Times, Himalayan Times, Itar-Tass, etc., were notified by 13:00 hrs (GM+2) on 07 September 2012 of aforementioned information, that:

(A) Application for Review of Breivik Judgement filed with Norway Supreme Court;
(B) Complaint filed with Parliamentary Ombudsman against Supreme Court, for slow case processing;
(C) Pending Judicial Ethics violation complaint against Judge Wenche Arntzen.

UK Press Complaints Commission Rulings Re: Breivik Inacuracy Complaints to New Statesman & The Guardian

UK Press Complaints Commission Rulings Re: Breivik Inacuracy Complaints to New Statesman & The Guardian

No Surprise! :: The Commission did not establish a breach of the Code.

29 September | Press Complaints Commission | The Guardian & New Statesman

The Commission did not establish a breach of the Code.

The Commission acknowledged the complainant’s concern about Mr Breivik’s ability to receive a fair trial, it made clear however that this issue did not fall within the Editors’ Code of Practice, and therefore it was unable to comment on this further.

The Commission turned next to the complaint regarding the article of 28 August. The complainant considered that the newspaper had breached the terms of Clause 1 (Accuracy) by referring to Mr Breivik’s “conviction” and by inferring that his inspiration was from the “far right”. Regardless of whether or not there is a review, it remained the case that the conviction stood at the time of publication, and the newspaper was entitled to refer to it. There was no breach of Clause 1.

The Commission addressed the complainant’s concern that it was inaccurate to state that Mr Breivik got his inspiration from the far right. Clause 1 (iii) states that “the press, while free to be partisan, must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact.” The Commission considered that the article was a comment piece and the remark reflected the journalist’s opinion that Mr Breivik’s actions were based on an extreme right-wing ideology. In this regard the Commission was satisfied that readers would not have been misled and did not establish a breach of the Code.

Letter to Editor: Errors in Chicago Sun Times: Breivik Ruling a Victory for Rule of Law

Letter to Editor: Errors in Chicago Sun Times: Breivik Ruling a Victory for Rule of Law

Letter to Chicago Sun Times Managing Editor: Craig Newman; Features Editor: Linda Bergstrom; News Editor: Zach Finken and Reason Editor: Jacob Sullum: RE: Jacob Sullum’s Article: Breivik ruling a victory for the rule of law.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | EcoFeminist vs. Breivik | 29 August 2012

Letter (PDF) to Chicago Sun Times Managing Editor: Craig Newman; Features Editor: Linda Bergstrom; News Editor: Zach Finken and Reason Editor: Jacob Sullum: RE: Jacob Sullum’s Article: Breivik ruling a victory for the rule of law.

[1] Norway’s Press Complaints Commission authorizes Norwegian Media to deceive the public, if the target of the deception consents to it. [PFU: Lara Johnstone vs. News with Views in Norway]

[2] The ‘Rule of Law’ in Norway: Norway v. Breivik: 3 Judicial Ethics and 170 Attorney Ethics Complaints Pending.

[3] Inaccuracy of Mr. Breivik’s ‘conviction’: Breivik’s Conviction has been appealed by means of review.

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

:: Fair Use Notice ::

FAIR USE NOTICE: The Norway v. Breivik blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the EcoFeminist vs. Breivik: Beyond Left and Right Wing: From an ecological perspective, all human economics and politics are irrelevant’ Argument. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to Norway v. Breivik Blog at: [EcoFeminist]


KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV	Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)

US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan	Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)

2006: US Army Strategy for Environment	CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]

Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future	Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]

NO v. Breivik :: Uncensored