Note to Readers:

Summary of Ecology of Peace Problem Solving: The problems of poverty, unemployment, war, crime, violence, food shortages, food price increases, inflation, police brutality, political instability, loss of civil rights, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, racism, sexism, Nazism, Islamism, feminism, Zionism etc; are the ecological overshoot consequences of humans living in accordance to a Masonic War is Peace international law social contract that provides humans the ‘right to breed and consume’ with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits.

Ecology of Peace factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are documented at MILED Clerk Notice.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Prison Psychiatrist: Randi Rosenqvist Notes Submitted to Judge, leading to Breivik Attorneys Appeal of New Experts





Controversial notes leading to the appeal of new experts

Oslo City Court had no right to receive reports from the psychiatrist Randi Rosenqvist about Anders Behring Breivik (32) without his consent, according to his defenders

Wenche Bird Bunch & Hakon Letvik | Aftenposten | Published: 19.jan. 2012 (22:13) Updated: 19.jan. 2012 (22:13)



Oslo District Court's decision to appoint two new forensic psychiatric experts must be set aside because of procedural errors, according to the defenders. Thursday they delivered into his appeal.

The question of the psychiatrist Randi Rosenqvists role is now up for the Oslo District Court. As advisor to the prison director Knut Bjarkeid considered she Behring Breivik and wrote three reports. She concluded that he was not psychotic or schizophrenic, the exact opposite of the forensic psychiatric expert Torgeir Husby and Synnøve Sørheim.

- The three statements from Rosenqvist is sent from the public prosecutor to the Oslo District Court. In our opinion, the court based and emphasized these notes on the question of appointment of new experts. The court shall not receive, view, use or emphasize such confidential material. This is such a major procedural error that we believe the decision of new experts to be repealed, said attorney Geir Lippestad.


Requirement of secrecy

He refers to the Criminal Procedure Act, Section 119, which states that the court must not accept testimony from a variety of professions, including doctors, something that is entrusted to them in their position, unless the person entitled to secrecy has consented.

Oslo District Court appointed a week ago psychiatrists Agnar Aspaas and Terje dry ice that new experts. In his explanation proved right "that the staff and advisory health related to Ila Prison, have not seen signs that the defendant is psychotic."


Continuing despite appeal

Although the 32-year-old defenders appealed the decision to appoint two psychiatrists, continuing the two's work. They will meet Friday morning court to discuss the mandate and work forward.

- The defense has not filed a suspensive effect, meaning that the appeal does not affect the committee's work. They will receive a letter with the formal appointment and mandate next week, says Chief Information Officer Irene Ramm in the Oslo District Court.

Attorney Lippestad will now await the Court of Appeal and possibly the Supreme Court's opinion on the appeal before he says something about how he perceives Rosenqvists role.

Nor will he consider the fact that the director at Ila Prison delivered Rosenqvists material on to the police, who in turn sent it to the public prosecutor, which also brought it to court.


The same mandate

Prosecutors Inga Bejer Engh and Svein Holden believes that the two new experts must have the same mandate that psychiatrists Torgeir Husby and Synne Sørheim got when they were appointed on 28 last July.

The mandate had four parts: the first part about how the mission was completed, the second part to assessment of sanity, part three was also review if it was appropriate to sentence of compulsory mental health care, and part four was all forecasts and assessments that could impact your right if the issue of custody was appropriate.

» » » » [Aftenposten]


No comments:

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]

:: Fair Use Notice ::

FAIR USE NOTICE: The Norway v. Breivik blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the EcoFeminist vs. Breivik: Beyond Left and Right Wing: From an ecological perspective, all human economics and politics are irrelevant’ Argument. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to Norway v. Breivik Blog at: [EcoFeminist]