Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Problem Solving: Poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc; are some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources.

Ecology of Peace RH factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate & sign their responsible freedom oaths; to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as international law; to require all citizens of all races, religions and nations to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are updated at EoP MILED Clerk.

Saturday, March 10, 2012

Oslo & Utoya Terror Survivors Agree with Breivik: He was Not Legally Insane on 22 July 2011

Terror survivors feel let down

March 8, 2012 | Nina Berglund | Norway News in English

Many of those who survived confessed terrorist Anders Behring Breivik’s bomb and massacre last summer have been telling Norwegian media that they feel let down by the state’s indictment against Breivik. Some fear he may not be held responsible for his murderous attacks, while others feel left out by not being actually named in the 19-page historic legal document.

Norwegian newspapers and broadcast outlets have been filled with stories about reaction to the indictment that was formally presented on Wednesday. While Breivik himself has said he was “disappointed” by it, because he claims he’s sane and acted rationally on July 22, many of the survivors and families of his victims seem to strangely feel the same.

They want him locked up for life and Breivik himself wants a jail term as well, while prosecutors say they will instead ask the court to commit him to a psychiatric institution. State authorities point to an initial evaluation by court-appointed psychiatrists that Breivik is insane and therefore can neither be held responsible for his acts nor sentenced to jail. They have stated they will await the conclusions of a second team of psychiatrists currently observing Breivik in the prison where he’s behind held, but the state still seems to be leaning towards obtaining an insanity verdict, also because of the doubt they claim will arise if the new psychiatrists declare Breivik sane and accountable.

Meanwhile, the presentation of the indictment stirred memories of the horrors of July 22, and feelings of being overlooked. Several persons who survived the bombing of government headquarters and the massacre on the island where Breivik shot persons at the Labour Party’s youth summer camp want public acknowledgment that they’re victims, too, and they want justice.

Many of those who were not physically injured on Utøya but badly traumatized by witnessing Breivik’s massacre , seeing friends be shot and fleeing for their lives wanted to be named in the indictment as being among Breivik’s victims. It’s widely viewed they were all victims of attempted murder, but under Norway’s legal system, each individual case would need to be evaluated for as many as 800 persons, meaning the case against Breivik would go on for years.
While the head of a victims’ support group said he understood the practicalities involved in trying to streamline the massive case, others weren’t so understanding.

“It’s been a tough day,” Randi Johansen Perreau, the mother of two victims of the massacre on the island of Utøya, told newspaper Dagsavisen. One of her sons was killed, while the other survived after seeing his brother shot and then being shot at himself while fleeing.

“The indictment is a betrayal of the many he (Breivik) tried to kill,” Perreau said. “It leaves an impression that society isn’t taking seriously that (those who dodged Breivik’s bullets) were also victims of a criminal act.”

Terje Solvik, who represents a newly formed group of 81 survivors living in Akershus County, also claimed the indictment was “quite thin” in terms of recognizing those who were victims of attempted murder. Prosecutors, Solvik told Dagsavisen, “could at least have mentioned that survivors were in grave danger and that it was coincidental who was killed and who wasn’t.”

Breivik ‘would do it again’
ALL 77 victims of Anders Breivik. Utøya, Norway, 22-07-2011. (12:17)
The indictment revealed that 56 of Breivik’s 69 victims on Utøya were shot in the head. Many suffered multiple gunshot wounds. Breivik moved over the entire island and targeted anyone he saw, prosecutors wrote.

“There was panic and mortal dread among children, youth and adults during the shooting, exacerbated by the limited opportunities to flee or hide,” stated prosecutors in the indictment.

Breivik’s defense attorney, Geir Lippestad, said that in addition to being disappointed that prosecutors believe he was insane, his client “wanted to make it very clear” that he believes he was sane and rational and still doesn’t regret his actions, which he has repeatedly said were motivated by his attempt to halt Norway’s development as a multi-cultural society. He wants Norway to be ethnically Caucasian and Christian, and especially opposes immigration of Muslims.

“He would do the same again if he could choose,” Lippestad told NRK on national TV Wednesday night. “He’s very clear about that.”
Anders Breivik: Habeus Mentem :: Right to Legal Sanity (21:04)

» » » » [Views and News from Norway/Nina Berglund]

No comments:

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]

:: Fair Use Notice ::

FAIR USE NOTICE: The Norway v. Breivik blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the EcoFeminist vs. Breivik: Beyond Left and Right Wing: From an ecological perspective, all human economics and politics are irrelevant’ Argument. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to Norway v. Breivik Blog at: [EcoFeminist]