Complaint against Chief Justice Tore Schei: Violation of Ethical Principles for Norwegian Judges

Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Problem Solving: Poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc; are some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources.

Ecology of Peace RH factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate & sign their responsible freedom oaths; to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as international law; to require all citizens of all races, religions and nations to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are updated at EoP MILED Clerk.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Complaint against Chief Justice Tore Schei: Violation of Ethical Principles for Norwegian Judges

Complaint against Chief Justice Tore Schei: Violation of Ethical Principles for Norwegian Judges: 1. (Rule of Law), 2. (Independence), 3 (Impartiality), 4 (Integrity), 5 (Equality), 7 (Formulation of Court Decisions), 12 (Judges relation to the media), 15 (Collegial Intervention).

06 June Update: Letter to Supv. Comm. of Judges

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 30 May 2012

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 2:15 PM
To: 'Supv. Comm. Judges'
Cc: 'Norway Supreme Court Admin'; Ch.Justice Tore Schei
Subject: Tilsynsutvalget for dommere: Klage: Justice Tore Schei: Brudd på: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12.

Secretariat of the Supervisory Committee for Judges,
National Courts Administration,
Tel: 73 56 70 00 | Fax: 73 56 70 01
E-mail: Supv. Comm. Judges (**@domstol.no)

CC: Chief Justice Tore Schei
Norway Supreme Court | Norges Høyesterett
Post: Postboks 8016 Dep., 0030 Oslo, Norge.
Høyesteretts plass 1, Oslo
Telefon: 22 03 59 00 Telefaks: 22 33 23 55
E-post: Norway Supreme Court Admin (**@hoyesterett.no)
E-post: Ch.Justice Tore Schei (**@hoyesterett.no)

Complaint against Chief Justice Tore Schei: Violation of Ethical Principles for Norwegian Judges: 1. (Rule of Law), 2. (Independence), 3 (Impartiality), 4 (Integrity), 5 (Equality), 7 (Formulation of Court Decisions), 12 (Judges relation to the media), 15 (Collegial Intervention).

[A] Overview of Complaint:

Complainant filed an application for Review and two Declaratory Orders to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter. This complaint assumes that the Chief Justice was involved in the administrative decision of Ms. Nygaard to refuse the applicants right of due process free and fair hearing (receipt of case number, hearing of eligibility of case) for her application for review.

Deputy Secretary General Kjersti Buun Nygaard responded to complainants request that the court issue a case number for her application to the court for review and declaratory orders, by stating:

"Reference is made to your e-mails regarding the above issue.

Please be advised that the Supreme Court of Norway only handles appeals against judgments given by the lower courts and can consequently not deal with the issue mentioned in your e-mails.

Further inquiries from you regarding the above issue can not be expected to be answered."

Ms. Nygaard on her own administrative initiative or on instruction of Justice Schei totally ignores the contents of the review applications providing the court with information as to the irregular behaviour of Judge Opsahl and Arntzen, who simply refuse to provide any due process response which could lead to a free and fair hearing ‘judgement’, in response to the applications to their courts. Conduct by a Judge which refuses to provide an applicant to their right to relevant due process procedure for a fair hearing to reach a judgement, is thereby in and of itself, a ‘judgement decision’ to deny the individual access to a free and fair hearing due process judgement.

Complaint Headings:
[A] Overview of Complaint
[B] Chronology of Facts
[C] Justice Torei’s Violation of Ethical Principles for Judges
[D] ECHR: Rule of law requires adequately Precise and Accessible Legislation
[E] Controversial Arguments in Complainants Application

Please find attached the Complaint & Annexures

Respectfully Submitted | Respektfullt Sendt

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist
Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity
Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored
http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/

Annexures:
[A] SA Constitutional Court Order by the Chief Justice in CCT 23-10 on 03 May 2010
[B] 30 November 2011 Application to Oslo District Court for a Writ of Habeus Mentem
[C] 15 April 2012 Application to Oslo District Court to proceed as an Amicus Curiae
[D] 10 May 2012 Application to Norway Supreme Court for Review & Declaratory Orders
[E] 15 May 2012 Error in Supreme Court Dep Sec. Gen Response to Application for Review
[F] 17 May 2012 Interpol Complaint: Obstruction of Environmental & Indigenous Rights Justice

*********************

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 4:09 PM
To: 'Supv. Comm. Judges'
Cc: 'Norway Supreme Court Admin'; Ch.Justice Tore Schei (tore.schei@hoyesterett.no)
Subject: RE: Tilsynsutvalget for dommere: Klage: Justice Tore Schei: Brudd på: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12.

Secretariat of the Supervisory Committee for Judges,
National Courts Administration,
Tel: 73 56 70 00 | Fax: 73 56 70 01

CC: Chief Justice Tore Schei
Norway Supreme Court | Norges Høyesterett

RE: 30 May 2012 Complaint against Chief Justice Tore Schei: Violation of Ethical Principles for Norwegian Judges: 1. (Rule of Law), 2. (Independence), 3 (Impartiality), 4 (Integrity), 5 (Equality), 7 (Formulation of Court Decisions), 12 (Judges relation to the media), 15 (Collegial Intervention).

I did not receive any official acknowledgement of receipt with any information detailing the process and procedure for my complaint; nor requesting me to provide additional information.

In Radical Honesty culture we have very different practices than Norwegian cultural practices. In my culture we welcome constructive criticism; it appears in Norwegian culture you do everything possible to avoid confronting and resolving constructive criticism. IN Radical Honesty culture our leaders value transparent criticism and problem solving. In Norwegian culture your legal judges prefer secret criticism and to hide complaints against them, behind 'legal secrecy' legislation, and to live like parasites on pretending to solve problems. No wonder Radical Honesty culture has no rape or murder; and your culture is littered with rapists and murderers.

Anyway, so I did not hear from you, checked your website again, and found a new addition I did not see before: You have an official complaint form! Fancy that!

So, I have filled it out for you, and provide it attached.

Respectfully Submitted

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist
Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity
Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored
http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/

» » » » [PDF :: Tilsynsutvalget for dommere]

No comments:

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

:: Fair Use Notice ::

FAIR USE NOTICE: The Norway v. Breivik blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the EcoFeminist vs. Breivik: Beyond Left and Right Wing: From an ecological perspective, all human economics and politics are irrelevant’ Argument. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to Norway v. Breivik Blog at: [EcoFeminist]


KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV	Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)

US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan	Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)

2006: US Army Strategy for Environment	CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]

Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future	Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]