Complaint to Indonesia Press Council: Jakarta Post Inaccuracy: Breivik Case Not Formally Over
Jakarta Post are republishing – and refusing to correct - the Lies of the Associated Press. All members of the Norwegian Foreign Press Association (including its Associated Press member) were informed on the morning of 07 September of the pending Application for Review of the Breivik Judgement, filed with the Supreme Court on 27 August 2012.
12 September 2012 | EcoFeminist vs. Breivik | 12 September 2012
Complaint to Indonesian Press Council (PDF): Subject: RE: Jakarta Post: Editor: Req. Correction of Error in Jakarta Post: No appeal from Breivik as case formally ends
Request Correction of Inaccuracy in: Jakarta Post: No appeal from Breivik as case formally ends.
The Case Has Not Formally Ended (Enclosures)
 27 August Application to Supreme Court for Review of Breivik Judgement.
On 27 August 2012 an application was filed with the Norwegian Supreme Court for Review of the Oslo District Court: Breivik Judgement, to set aside (A) the Necessity ruling, and (B) the conviction and Remit to Oslo District Court for hearing of further evidence to conclude Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Evidentiary Enquiry. The finding of guilt, in the absence of full Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Conclusions renders the Guilt Finding Inadequate. [continued in 12-09-12 PDF Complaint]
 Notifications to Norwegian Foreign Press Association (FPA)
The Norwegian Foreign Press Association as well as all their members, which include journalists from Reuters, Agence France Presse (AFP), Associated Press (AP), Al Arabija, Al Jazeera, BBC, Bloomberg, Globe and Mail, Xinhua, Die Welt, Irish Times, Himalayan Times, Itar-Tass, etc., were notified by 13:00 hrs (GM+2) on 07 September 2012 [continued in 12-09-12 PDF Complaint]
Violations of Press Code:
Article 1: (2)Accuracy: Accurate means absolutely unbelievable fit the objective circumstances when the event occurs; (3) Balanced: Balanced means that all sides get equal opportunities.
The republished Associated Press article is not accurate. The case is not formally ended. It is not balanced in terms of not including information censored by the Norwegian Media.
Article 2: (4) produce clear and factual news source
The republished Associated Press article is not factually correct. The Breivik case is not formally over.
Article 3: (1) Testing information means do check and recheck about the truth of the information.
The Jakarta Post were provided with evidence (12-09-03) to prove the Associated Press’s article was factually incorrect; but have so far refused to test the evidence provided to them and print a correction.
Article 4: (1) Lying means something that is already known in advance by journalists as being inconsistent with the facts that occurred.
Republishing – and refusing to correct - the Lies of the Associated Press. All members of the Norwegian Foreign Press Association (including its Associated Press member) were informed on the morning of 07 September of the pending Application for Review of the Breivik Judgement, filed with the Supreme Court on 27 August 2012.
Encl: [A] 12-09-12: Request to Jakarta Post to Correct Inaccuracy; [B] 12-08-27: Review of Breivik Judgement Filing Sheet & PO complaint; [C] 12-09-03: Supv. Comm. 4 Judges: Pending Judge Arntzen Complaint (12-072); [D] 12-09-10: Sup.Crt: Sec.Gen: G Bergby: Breivik Review Applic. & Response
» » » » [EcoFeminist vs. Breivik]