PCC Complaint: The Guardian: Inaccuracy of Breivik conviction; Guardian's Liberal White Guilt Bigotry& Breiviks Possible Fraud
Complaint issues: [A] Inacuraccy of Mr. Breivik’s ‘conviction’: Conviction has been appealed by means of review; [B] Possible Inacuraccy of Mr. Breivik’s inspiration being the ‘far right’ ; [C] White Guilt Liberal Bigotry to Muslims Implying they are incapable of hearing criticism: challenging alleged ‘negative attitudes’.
Andrea Muhrrteyn | EcoFeminists vs. Breivik | 29 August 2012
Complaint submitted to Press Complaints Commission against The Guardian: Sindre Bangstad: Article: After Anders Breivik's conviction, Norway must confront Islamophobia (PDF).
This complaint refers to a violation of Editors Code. 1. Accuracy, and relates to the following statements made by Mr. Bangstad in his article: After Anders Breivik's conviction, Norway must confront Islamophobia[1]:
[1] Inacuraccy of Mr. Breivik’s ‘conviction’: Conviction has been appealed by means of review.
On 27 August 2012 an application was filed with the Norwegian Supreme Court for Review of the Oslo District Court: Breivik Judgement, to set aside (A) the Necessity ruling, and (B) the conviction; to conclude Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Evidentiary Enquiry. The finding of guilt, in the absence of full Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Conclusions renders the Guilt Finding Inadequate.
[B] Possible Inacuraccy of Mr. Breivik’s inspiration being the ‘far right’
[C] White Guilt Liberal Bigotry to Muslims Implying they are incapable of hearing criticism: challenging alleged ‘negative attitudes’.



