Note to Readers:

Summary of Ecology of Peace Problem Solving: The problems of poverty, unemployment, war, crime, violence, food shortages, food price increases, inflation, police brutality, political instability, loss of civil rights, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, racism, sexism, Nazism, Islamism, feminism, Zionism etc; are the ecological overshoot consequences of humans living in accordance to a Masonic War is Peace international law social contract that provides humans the ‘right to breed and consume’ with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits.

Ecology of Peace factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are documented at MILED Clerk Notice.

Friday, August 24, 2012

PCC: Press Comp. Comm: Accuracy Complaint: New Statesman: Grotesque Manipulations of Anders Breivik




PCC: Press Comp. Comm: Accuracy Complaint: New Statesman: Grotesque Manipulations of Anders Breivik


[1] Inacuraccy of Mr. Breivik as ‘the man who is truly guilty’ (violation of presumption of innocence); [II] Mr. Breivik’s StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Circus was not a Fair Trial

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 23 August 2012


Complaint submitted to Press Complaints Commission (PCC) against New Statesman: Åsne Seierstad: Article: The grotesque manipulations of Anders Breivik; Violation of Editors Code: 1. Accuracy.

This complaint relates to the following statements made by Ms. Seierstad in her article: The grotesque manipulations of Anders Breivik:

--------
So, how do we handle the man who is truly guilty? Are we prepared to punish the culprit in keeping with the standards of his crime?

[..]

In the letters, Breivik explained how he plans to keep fighting against the values of Norwegian society. Those same values that gave him a fair trial, lax treatment in prison and even the right to keep spreading his message.
--------

If truth be told, there is something Mr. Breivik fears way more than an insanity verdict; that an EcoFeminist’s efforts on behalf of his right to a free and fair trial, will eventually be successful.


PCC: Press Comp. Comm: Accuracy Complaint: New Statesman: Grotesque Manipulations of Anders Breivik


[1] Inacuraccy of Mr. Breivik as ‘the man who is truly guilty’ (violation of presumption of innocence); [II] Mr. Breivik’s StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Circus was not a Fair Trial

Complaint submitted to Press Complaints Commission (PCC) against New Statesman: Åsne Seierstad: Article: The grotesque manipulations of Anders Breivik; Violation of Editors Code: 1. Accuracy.

This complaint relates to the following statements made by Ms. Seierstad in her article: The grotesque manipulations of Anders Breivik:

--------
So, how do we handle the man who is truly guilty? Are we prepared to punish the culprit in keeping with the standards of his crime?

[..]

In the letters, Breivik explained how he plans to keep fighting against the values of Norwegian society. Those same values that gave him a fair trial, lax treatment in prison and even the right to keep spreading his message.
--------

Overview of Complaint:

[1] Inacuraccy of Mr. Breivik as ‘the man who is truly guilty’


Only persons who are (A) totally ignorant of objectively applying the principles of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in accordance to rules of evidence and due process; and/or (B) endorse the denial of the principles of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in accordance to rules of evidence and due process to Mr. Breivik; could imply that Breivik is truly guilty, when he has not been found guilty in a court of law.

* Oslo Court: Breivik Defence of Necessity:
* The Necessity Defence
* Prosecutor Engh and Holden ‘Refuse to touch Breivik’s Principle of Necessity’:
* Onus of Proof: Norwegian State or Breivik to Prove Necessity?
* Common Law Necessity Defence Cases Resulting in Innocence Verdicts or Severe Mitigation of Sentencing:
* Civil Disobedience Political Necessity Defence Cases Resulting in Innocence Verdicts or Severe Mitigation of Sentencing:
* Request to Lippestad Attorneys: Request for Clarification regarding Defence Counsel’s focus on ‘sane/safety’ issue, while seemingly ignoring the ‘innocence/guilt’ issue, thereby denying Breivik’s right to Impartial trial to enquire into the evidence for and against his Necessity Defence.

[II] Mr. Breivik’s StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Circus was not a Fair Trial

* Prosecutor Engh and Holden ‘Refuse to touch Breivik’s Principle of Necessity’
* Massive Censorship of Corruption in Norway v. Breivik Trial: (A) Bar Association Complaints, (B) Secretariat for the Supervisory Committee for Judges Complaints, (C) Environmental Appeals Board: Media Censorship Complaints.
* Norway Media's Censorship of PFU 'Breivik Guilty Complaint' Against News in English: Nina Berglund.

Please find full details of complaint in attached PDF.

PS: Note to New Statesman:

Ms. Seierstad also writes:

"There is one thing that Breivik fears: that he will be judged insane. This would take away his aura of being an ideologue, a political prisoner. He would then just be a nobody again. Most of the surviving victims see the harshest punishment for him as isolation. They hope that someone will take away his computer, restrict his letter-writing and leave him alone in his cell with his thoughts and his guilt."

If truth be told, there is something Mr. Breivik fears way more than an insanity verdict; that an EcoFeminist’s efforts on behalf of his right to a free and fair trial, will eventually be successful.

A verdict of insanity will only reinforce his argument about the corrupt Norwegian state, which will enable his Political Psychiatry martyrdom. A retrial, focussed on the objective and subjective evidence for his alleged act of ‘necessity’; that occurs as a result of the activist efforts of an Honourable Rule of Law EcoFeminist, utterly destroys his argument that all Feminist’s endorse (i) right wing censorship, (ii) the feminization of men, and (iii) that women have no honour, etc. The last thing Mr. Breivik wants is an HONOURABLE ENEMY ECOFEMINIST fighting for his right to a free and fair trial. It is his worst nightmare.

» » » » [PCC - New Statesman Complaint (PDF)]

No comments:

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]

:: Fair Use Notice ::

FAIR USE NOTICE: The Norway v. Breivik blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the EcoFeminist vs. Breivik: Beyond Left and Right Wing: From an ecological perspective, all human economics and politics are irrelevant’ Argument. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to Norway v. Breivik Blog at: [EcoFeminist]