Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Problem Solving: Poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc; are some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources.

Ecology of Peace RH factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate & sign their responsible freedom oaths; to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as international law; to require all citizens of all races, religions and nations to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are updated at EoP MILED Clerk.

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Conspiracy & Corruption in Judge's Chambers in Breivik Case



Conspiracy & Corruption in Judge's Chambers in Breivik Case

Court Censorship of Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 14 June 2012


On 13 June 2012 Complaints against Mette Yvonne Larsen, Siv Hallgren, Frode Elgesem, Geir Lippestad, Vibeke Hein Baera, Tord Jordet and Odd Ivar Aursnes Gron were submitted to the Norwegian Bar Association for Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection. On 14 June 2012, the coverup in court continued...










Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Mette Yvonne Larsen | Siv Hallgren | Frode Elgesem | Geir Lippestad | Vibeke Hein Baera | Tord Jordet | Odd Ivar Aursnes Gron

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 13 June 2012


Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”




From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 11:39 PM
To: 'Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints'; 'Disciplinary Committee:'; 'Judge Ernst Moe'
Cc: NO: Crt: Breivik: Lippestad; NO: Lippestad: Tord Jordet; NO: Lippestad: Odd Gron; Crt: Victims: Siv Hallgren; Crt: Victims: Frode Elgesem; Crt: Victims: Mette Yvonne Larsen
Subject: Adv.For: Disc.Comp: Larsen | Hallgren | Elgesem | Lippestad | Baera | Jordet | Gron

Disciplinary Complaints
The Norwegian Bar Association | Den Norske Advokatforening

Head: Judge Ernst Moe
Sec: Beate Sundstrøm
Disciplinary Committee | Disiplinærnemnden

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints:
[Hereby sent collectively; with link to complaint.
Sent individually will include complaint & attachments]


* Stabell & Co: Mette Yvonne Larsen

* Advokatfirmaet Elden: Siv Hallgren

* Advokatfirmaet Thommessen AS: Frode Elgesem

* Advokatfirmaet Lippestad AS: Geir Lippestad

* Advokatfirmaet Lippestad AS: Vibeke Hein Bæra

* Advokatfirmaet Lippestad AS: Tord Kvinge Jordet

* Advokatfirmaet Lippestad AS: Odd Ivar Aursnes Gron

Complaint: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation): Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud


[A] Overview of Complaint:

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”
“It is time to review the performance of the prosecution. They have failed to understand or admit that they are dealing with a political case, and not a case of insanity.”

“Breivil attacked the Norwegian Labour Party, blaming them for destroying Norway by permtting unchecked muslim immigration. A huge number of Norwegians share that opinion.”

“From the very beginning the prosecution had to understand that they deal with a political terror attack on the Labour party. Not on Norway. On the Labour Party. The distinction seems to be important to understand.”

The prosecution have spent an amazing amount of time trying to assert that Breivik’s Knights Templar network does not exist. The Knights Templar were an order who, during the Crusades fought against the muslims. The political symbolism for Breivik in that name is rather clear, also that he engages in political propaganda.

Mr Breivik’s political fight is likely to continue from jail. He will want to see such networks as the Knights Templar develop, prosper, and take action against the immigration of Islam into Europe through violence. These ideas will not go away by forcing mental illness on the ideas. which is what the prosecution seems to be doing.

Soviet psychiatric hospitals known as "psikhushkas" were used by the Soviet authorities as prisons in order to isolate hundreds or thousands of political prisoners from the rest of society, discredit their ideas, and break them physically and mentally.

The Norwegian state attorney strategy does not impress us. They are dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.


The editor of VG was informed via Twitter, of Mr. Reidar's blog post calling for a Review of the Prosecution's focus on a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial; but clearly does not consider the information as worthy of publication, for the Norwegian people to consider and debate.



Ben McPherson over at Foreigner.NO seems to be having doubts about his commitment to White Supremacy Political Psychiatry Show Trials: Something very strange is happening in the Breivik Trial.


Emails sent Individually will include complaints & attachments.

Respectfully Submitted


Lara Johnstone
Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist
Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity

» » » » [Stabell & Co: Mette Yvonne Larsen || Advokatfirmaet Elden: Siv Hallgren || Advokatfirmaet Thommessen AS: Frode Elgesem || Advokatfirmaet Lippestad AS: Geir Lippestad || Advokatfirmaet Lippestad AS: Vibeke Hein Bæra || Advokatfirmaet Lippestad AS: Tord Kvinge Jordet || Advokatfirmaet Lippestad AS: Odd Ivar Aursnes Gron]






Posted by at
Labels: , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]

:: Fair Use Notice ::

FAIR USE NOTICE: The Norway v. Breivik blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the EcoFeminist vs. Breivik: Beyond Left and Right Wing: From an ecological perspective, all human economics and politics are irrelevant’ Argument. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to Norway v. Breivik Blog at: [EcoFeminist]