I am currently a Radical Honoursty Bushido Dischordian Warrior: Confronting the Honour and Personal Responsibility of Ego-Existential Death

My ideology is HONOUR and PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY; Whats Yours?

13 December 2011 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | Radical Honoursty

This draft is a work in progress -- an existential ideological working hypothesis truthseeking enquiry, to the question: Who Am I? -- and was first posted as a note to my facebook wall at Lara Zhivago; including a few of the Shibumi comments posted there to answer questions.

My ideology is HONOUR and PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY:

Whats your ideology: backstabbing lying two-faced coward; pretending to be a 'communist' or 'capitalist' or 'environmentalist' or 'socialist' or 'nationalist'?????

All of those 'ideologies' are nothing but tools: Use the appropriate tool (hammer/screwdriver) for the appropriate problem (nail/screw) and you solve your problem. Use a hammer on a screw, and you got yourself a never ending problem.

Same thing with ideologies: communism is wonderful for two people or more, who make a fully informed consensual agreement to pool their resources and reap the benefits from them (like couples do when they get married); and it is a fucked up ideology to force upon people who are not committed to contributing towards the resource pool.

Any ideology can work for any group of people when (A) all individuals are fully informed about what the definitions of the ideology entail: the ideologies social contact; (B) hence they are fully informed about what that ideologies rules are; (C) they are able to make fully informed consensual commitments and agreements to each other to abide by the particular ideologies rules; (D) the ideologies rules do not conflict with reality; particularly resource realities.

For an extreme example: Imagine you get 20 people who are cannibals: they like eating human meat. Knowing how much they enjoy eating another humans meat, they understand that another cannibal would get as much enjoyment from eating their own meat. They can establish a tribe whereby they have rules about how anyone gets chosen to be the next feast dinner meal. They can make rules on how they breed and educate their children about how and why they have the rules they do, and the benefits and liabilities. If everyone is clear about the rules, that enjoying another meat, which allows them to be a cannibal, also means one day, they shall be selected to be eaten and enjoyed in a particular feast. They are able to make fully informed decisions and commitment to join, they can be happy about eating each other, and about sacrificing themselves to be eaten by others, knowing their death is appreciated by their tribe. Everyone knows the rules, and everyone abides by the rules, even though some other tribe may think its a savage social contract, or whatever. The point is: (A) clear rules; (B) Fully informed consensual commitments agreement to the rules; (C) the rules apply to everyone, including leaders, nobody is excluded from the rules. CANNIBALISM can WORK! Any ideology can work.

Most ideologies do not work because: (A) the leaders prefer to use vague ambiguous terminology, for fear they shall not be able to get enough slaves and cannon fodder followers to make a commitment to joining their ideology tribe, so as to manipulate the rules that they are not beholden to the rules, but benefit from good rules, and are excluded from the rules they don't like, but expect all followers to follow; (B): hence the followers are unable to make fully informed decisions and hence their commitment is not sincere nor serious, and (C) the followers fight amongst themselves, because they are unclear about the rules; while the leaders live like parasites on the followers, while keeping the followers focused on arguing with each other, and not on the fact that the leaders ideological rules and definitions are deliberately vague, for the purpose of their benefit from the situation. This results in people becoming pissed off with their 'ideology' and turning to another ideology for answers, or digging in deeper and blaming the other ideolgies as being the causes of their problems. You heard the victim me pity parties: OH ITS THE JEWS.. , its the COMMIES.. its the CAPITALISTS... its the FEMINISTS... and on and on!! When the underlying problem is: NO HONOUR, NO HONESTY, NO CLARITY, NO CLEAR DEFINITIONS, NO FULLY INFORMED CONSENT.

It is never: WE HAVE MET THE PROBLEM AND IT IS US!! We are not committed to setting clear simple rules for our ideology (whatever the ideology is); establishing a tribe of members who all commit to the rules, and to making fully informed consensual agreements to abide by the rules.

I have no followers; cause my followers have to read my definitions for what I mean by honour, and they have to be very crystal clear about what I demand of a follower: I ain't interested in no ignorant schmuck who thinks they can pretend to join a ideology of 'honour' and 'personal responsibility' without knowing what is going to be required of them to do so. So they got to inform themselves.

“I nominate Anders Behring Breivik for Eurabia Code Black Swan Nobel Sainthood” - Lara Johnstone, Norwegian-SA; Radical Honesty SA

"One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100 000 who have only interests" -- Anders Behring Breivik, Ethno-Nationalist

“The men the European public admires most extravagantly are the most daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth.”

‘Sarah Maid of Albion documents the number of white South African [farmers] who have been killed in what begins to resemble a systematic racism motivated genocide. 3,066 documented murders (the real numbers are much higher NOK).’ - Anders Behring Breivik (Brandon Huntley granted asylum as result of racism)

Anders Behring Breivik is the main suspect in the Norwegian bomb attacks and shootings. He has been described by police as an alleged Christian fundamentalist with right-wing views. The 32-year-old appears to have set up accounts on the social networking sites Facebook and Twitter just a few days ago.

The @AndersBBreivik twitter account attributed to Breivik has only one post, which is a quote from the philosopher John Stuart Mill: “One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100,000 who have only interests.”

On his facebook page, Mr. Breivik describes his interests as Christianity, Conservatism; Anti-Multiculturalism, 1984 (Orwell), On Liberty. It listed his interests as hunting, body building and freemasonry.

Government business records show him as the sole director of Breivik Geofarm, a company Norwegian media is describing as a farming sole proprietorship. The company was set up to cultivate vegetables, melons, roots and tubers, Norway's TV2 says, which provided him the opportunity to purchase six tons of fertilizer, an ingredient used in bomb-making.

He also spent three years compiling a cultural conservative Justiciare Manifesto, which includes his own writings, as well as cut and pastes from many other writers available online: 2083: The European Declaration of Independence (PDF). To accompany his Manifesto he also released a video, since deleted by Youtube, but copies available at youtube, Twitvideo.

2083: A European Declaration of Independence, by Andrew Berwick (aka Andres Breivik), London [From Unwanted Advocate: (PDF)]

[QUOTE] Much of the information presented in this compendium (3 books) has been deliberately kept away from the European peoples by our governments and the politically correct mainstream media (MSM). More than 90% of the EU and national parliamentarians and more than 95% of journalists are supporters of European multiculturalism and therefore supporters of the ongoing Islamic colonisation of Europe; yet, they DO NOT have the permission of the European peoples to implement these doctrines.

The compendium, - “2083 – A European Declaration of Independence” - documents through more than 1000 pages that the fear of Islamisation is all but irrational. It covers the following main topics:

1. The rise of cultural Marxism/multiculturalism in Western Europe
   
2. Why the Islamic colonization and Islamisation of Western Europe began
   
3. The current state of the Western European Resistance Movements (anti-Marxist/anti-Jihad movements)
   
4. Solutions for Western Europe and how we, the resistance, should move forward in the coming decades
   
5. + Covering all, highly relevant topics including solutions and strategies for all of the 8 different political fronts [END QUOTE]

Read more »