Ecology of Peace Theses urges Britain to Dismiss charges against Woolwich Attackers of Drummer Lee Rigby

Ecology of Peace Theses urges Britain to dismiss charges against Woolwich Attackers of Drummer Lee Rigby: Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale

Britain's Civilized Patriarchy Legal Matrix Prosecutorial and Juristic Bishops have no legal ecological moral authority to prosecute Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, or adjudicate upon the alleged ‘lawfulness’ or ‘unlawfulness’ of their acts of murder, while ignoring the theft and thievery and participation in mass murder of the civilized patriarchy corporate elite, who purchased ‘Innocence for Sale’ Indulgences from legislators to avoid legislation that defines their ecologically criminal acts of billion dollar thievery and murder as ‘unlawful’.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | TYGAE | 15 July 2013

Electronic Filing of Amicus to (i) Common Serjeant: His Honour Judge Brian Barker QC, Central Criminal Court / Old Bailey; (ii) Prisoners: Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, C/O Governor: Phil Wragg, Belmarsh Prison, c/o: Jeremy Wright MP, Minister for Prisons and Rehabilitation, Ministry of Justice; (iii) : Victim/Rigby Family: c/o Helen Grant MP, Minister for Victims and the Courts; and Rt Hon Philip Hammond MP, Secretary of State for Defence, Ministry of Defence. CC: Transparency: Muslim Community: Sec. Gen. Mr. Farooq Murad, Muslim Council of Britain & Sharia Council

Summary of the Æquilibriæx Amicus Argument: Theses on the Power and Efficacy of Civilized Patriarchy’s AnthroCorpocentric Indulgences Innocence for Sale Legal Matrix Jurisprudence:

Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, like Beate Zschape and Anders Breivik and many thousands of others, are simply low-level left/right, white/black, Muslim/Christian Ethnic-Conflict foot-soldiers, of Civilized Patriarchy’s AnthroCorpocentric Legal Matrix’s Control of the Reproduction Human Factory Farming War Economy Racket, and Consumptionism Cultural Colonialism Racket agenda’s.

These civilized patriarchy criminal charges against Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale should be:

[1] Suspended; until Britain’s legislators and/or jurists demonstrate their credible cause-effect-ecologically-literate-consciousness capacity for legislating an honest transparent social contract between the British Government and its citizens, by regulating the relations between humans, nature and other animals species and the relations between humans amongst themselves, in terms of their gender, culture, ethnic, religious and ideological conflicts; by (A) granting automatic equal legal personhood and rights to women, non-patriarchal – matriarchal or gender balanced – cultures’, nature and animal and plant species; and (B) legislating fully informed consenting military and intelligence enlistment agreements which accurately fully disclose to any prospective signer of such agreement that in the absence of legislation amending the Constitution’s rights to procreate and consume to ecological carrying capacity limits; any individual signing any British military enlistment form is signing up to be cannon fodder resource thieves and mass murderers for Britain’s civilized patriarchy human factory farming profiteering elite, based upon the legal authority of ecologically illiterate social contract jurisprudence; or (C) implementing and enforcing legislation which requires all British citizens to limit their rights to procreation and consumption to below carrying capacity levels.

[2] Dismissed; if Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale sign the MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Whistleblower/Activist Oath, and submits it to either the American Walk Your Footprint Talk to Support the Troops Military Advisory Board (11 retired Generals and Admirals concerned with ecological overshoot and scarcity induced resource war conflict); or to a British Walk Your Footprint Talk to Support the Troops Military Advisory Board of retired Generals and Admirals concerned with ecological overshoot and scarcity induced resource war conflict, of their own choosing.

Such a judicial act of suspension – or the parties mutual leadership focus on problem solving their dispute, by means of reaching a MILINT Ecology of Peace agreement for dismissal – of the case against Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, would act as a slap on the bare back of the ecologically illiterate newborn baby – breeding/consumption scarcity combatant – public.

CNN: Petraeus Fired to stop his support for Sustainable Security, exposing Nobel's “War is Peace” Fraud

CNN: Petraeus Fired to stop his support for Sustainable Security, exposing Nobel's “War is Peace” Fraud

Submission made to Washington DC FBI Director, James McJunkin on 19 November, asks the FBI whether the FBI's Petraeus-Broadwell investigation was used as a convenient excuse to fire Petraeus, to prevent Petraeus from implementing a Sustainable Security (One Child Per Family = Sincere Peacenik) Peace Plan, submitted to the CIA, as part of court documents, involving Wikileaks and Pfc Manning; on 15 October 2012.

22 November 2012 | Habeus Mentem | CNN IReport

NO Env. Appeals Board Rules 'Media's Censorship of Population & Consumption does not Affect Environment''

NO Env. Appeals Board Rules 'OverPopulation and Consumption does not Affect Environment'

The Environmental Appeals Board’s ruling that Editors decision-making to censor information about the Media’s Population-Environment-Terrorism Connection during Breivik’s Highly Public Terrorism trial, alleging that it was not ‘Environmental Information’ is beyond absurd, and totally lacking in factual and legal justifications.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 12 November 2012

Anders Breivik Alleged that his Terrorism was motivated by the Media’s Censorship of Non-Violent Problem Solving, which facilitated a socio-political pressure cooker reality for the media's If it Leads, It Bleeds Profit from violence.

Oslo Organized Crime Police Investigation Report: "Explanation of 22 July 2011, doc 08,01, states:

“[Breivik] emphasizes that if he had not been censored by the media all his life, he would not have had to do what he did. He believes the media have the main responsibility for what has happened because they did not publish his opinions.... The low-intensity civil war that he had already described, had lasted until now with ideological struggle and censorship of cultural conservatives...... He explains that this is the worst day of his life and that he has dreaded this for 2 years. He has been censored for years. He mentions Dagbladet and Aftenposten as those who among other things have censored him..... He says that he also wrote “essays” that he tried to publish via the usual channels, but that they were all censored..... The subject summarizes: As long as more than twelve were executed, the operation will still be a success. The experts ask how the number twelve comes into consideration. Twelve dead are needed to penetrate the censorship wall, he explains..... About his thoughts on the Utøya killings now, the subject says: The goal was to execute as many as possible. At least 30. It was horrible, but the number had to be assessed based on the global censorship limit. Utøya was a martyrdom, and I am very proud of it..... The subject says in the conversation that he knows the truth that is hidden from others. He believes that there is a civil war in the country. He believes he had to kill at least twelve, because there is a censorship-wall preventing an open debate about what is happening in the country..... So I knew I had to cross a certain threshold to exceed the censorship-wall of the international media."

Norway v. Breivik References in US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces & Supreme Court Applications

Norway v. Breivik References in USCAAF (CCR v USA) & US Supreme Court (Alien v. RCFP) Applications

References to Media's abuse of publicity power in Norway v. Breivik: USCAAF: Founding Affidavit (pg.51-61) & Amicus Curiae (pg.26-27; 28); Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari (pg.30)

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Ecofeminist vs. Breivik | 04 November 2012

[112] Subsequent to the Oslo District Court‘s 24 August Judgement, finding Mr. Breivik sane and guilty, the applicant filed a RH Ecofeminist Ecocentric Wild Law Sustainable Security application for Review[106] of parts of the Patriarchal Anthropocentric Judgement, specifically for orders to [A.1] Set Aside the Judgements "Necessity (Nødrett) Ruling"; and [A.2] Set Aside Defendant‘s Conviction (Finding of Guilt) and Remit to Oslo District Court for hearing of Further Evidence to conclude Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Evidentiary Enquiry, and to ... [B] Set Aside the Judgements Failure to disclose the pending Judicial Ethics violation complaint against Rettens Leder: Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen, filed on 06 June 2012 to the Secretariat for the Supervisory Committee for Judges, as a violation of Aarhus Convention Article 3.(3)(4)(5) principles, and general ECHR public accountability Transparency (Lithgow & others v United Kingdom) principles.

[113] The grounds for the application being that: [A.1.a] Necessity Judgement fails to provide any necessity criminal provisions that prohibit killing of Government Officials in case of Necessity; [A.1.b] Necessity Judgement Ignores that Criminal Necessity provisions do not prohibit the killing of Government Officials in case of objective and subjective Necessity; [A.1.c] Necessity Judgements Erroneous interpretation of Necessity related criminal law provisions and international necessity related human rights law; [A.1.d] Necessity and Guilt Judgements Failure to conduct required Objective and Subjective Tests for Defendant‘s Necessity Defence; [A.1.e] Necessity and Guilt Judgements Absence of Objective and Subjective Test Enquiry and Conclusions Renders it Inadequate; [A.1.f] Necessity and Guilt Judgements Absence of Clarification Upon which party the Onus of Proof lies in a Case of Necessity; and how or why their evidence was insufficient renders the Judgements Conclusions inadequate; [A.1.g] Necessity and Guilt Judgements Absence of Objective and Subjective Test Enquiry and Conclusions Renders it a Discriminatory Precedent; [A.1.i] Necessity Judgements "Extreme Political Objectives" conclusion is unsupported in the Absence of Objective and Subjective Necessity Test; and is a Masculine (Reason and Logic) Insecurity Left vs. Right Wing Blame Game Parasite Leeching Polarization – not a Matriarchal Ecological and Psychological Integrity Root Cause Problem Solving – conclusion.

UK Press Complaints Commission Rulings Re: Breivik Inacuracy Complaints to New Statesman & The Guardian

UK Press Complaints Commission Rulings Re: Breivik Inacuracy Complaints to New Statesman & The Guardian

No Surprise! :: The Commission did not establish a breach of the Code.

29 September | Press Complaints Commission | The Guardian & New Statesman

The Commission did not establish a breach of the Code.

The Commission acknowledged the complainant’s concern about Mr Breivik’s ability to receive a fair trial, it made clear however that this issue did not fall within the Editors’ Code of Practice, and therefore it was unable to comment on this further.

The Commission turned next to the complaint regarding the article of 28 August. The complainant considered that the newspaper had breached the terms of Clause 1 (Accuracy) by referring to Mr Breivik’s “conviction” and by inferring that his inspiration was from the “far right”. Regardless of whether or not there is a review, it remained the case that the conviction stood at the time of publication, and the newspaper was entitled to refer to it. There was no breach of Clause 1.

The Commission addressed the complainant’s concern that it was inaccurate to state that Mr Breivik got his inspiration from the far right. Clause 1 (iii) states that “the press, while free to be partisan, must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact.” The Commission considered that the article was a comment piece and the remark reflected the journalist’s opinion that Mr Breivik’s actions were based on an extreme right-wing ideology. In this regard the Commission was satisfied that readers would not have been misled and did not establish a breach of the Code.

US Crt of Appeals for Armed Forces: Ecocentric Wild Law Sustainable Security Amicus Curiae in CCR v. USA

US Crt of Appeals for Armed Forces: Ecocentric Wild Law Sustainable Security Amicus Curiae in CCR v. USA

Abuse of Publicity Power: Political-Psychiatry’s PC Whores: Norway v. Breivik: .. Amici is unaware of any news article implying Breivik’s insanity, with equivalent publicity to expert/s who assert that ‘there is no such thing as mental illness[4], or a mental disorder[5]’, its all just about social control[6], PC ‘value judgements and cultural norms’[7]; based upon ‘horoscope chart science’[8] and Pharma-Psychiatry’s Humpty Dumpty[9] definition of ‘insanity’ and ‘disorder’.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | EcoFeminist v. Breivik | 24 September 2012

Amicus (PDF) Electronically filed with Clerk of the Court: US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces: Subject: CCR v. United States - Dkt. No. 12-8027/AR - Electronic Filing - Amicus

USCA Misc. Dkt. No. 12-8027/AR :: CCR v USA & Judge Lind

[Caveat: Subject to Order from Court ITO S. 35 Judiciary Act of 1789, 1 Stat. 73, 92; Rules 13(a) & 33 (leniency on procedure and Radical Honesty English)]

SUMMARY OF RH ECOCENTRIC ARGUMENT:

1. EcoFeminist Radical Honoursty Transparency culture Wild Law Sustainable Security perspective to parties Anthropocentric Masculine Insecurity PR War of Pretend Transparency to profit from the ‘Control of Reproduction’ Human Farming War Economy Racket

2. Pfc Manning cannot receive free and fair trial, if Media Abuse their Publicity Power

Petitioners: CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, ET AL.: Glenn Greenwald, Amy Goodman of Democracy Now!,The Nation and its national security correspondent Jeremy Scahill, Wikileaks and its publisher, Julian Assange; Kevin Gosztola, co-author of Truth and Consequences: The U.S. vs. Bradley Manning, and Chase Madar: author of The Passion of Bradley Manning.

Respondents: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COL. DENISE LIND, MILITARY JUDGE

Response from Clerk of Court:
Response from US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces Clerk: Sent: Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 3:43 PM: Subject: RE: CCR v. United States - Dkt. No. 12-8027/AR - Electronic Filing - Amicus: "Your pleadings have been received and referred to the Court."

[Update] Environment Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | Bergense Tidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG

[Update] Request to Minister of Environment: Bård Vegar Solhjell: RE: Environment Appeals Brd: Appeal: RE: Addresseavisen | Aftenposten | Bergense Tidende | Dagbladet | NRK | TV2 | VG



Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law); RE: Censorship in Norway’s Media: (I) Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway’s Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 25 June 2012

Environmental Appeals Board: Documentation Services, Records Management: We hereby confirm the receipt of your inquiry. Reference no: 2012/708 - 1...

Request for Access to Environment and Health Information in terms of S.28 (Freedom of Information Act) and S.10 (Environmental Law); RE: Censorship in Norway’s Media: (I) Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway’s Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny

Request for Information Questions:

[1] Editors decision-making justification for censorship of the Norway v. Breivik Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection documentation provided to their publication in 13 May 2012 email: Breivik Acquittal Justified by Media's Massive Censorship of Oslo Crt Proceedings?

[2] (a) The total number of articles published by their publication either in print or online which refer to Breivik’s alleged ‘insanity’; and (b) the number of these articles which - for fairness, impartiality and scientific objectivity - include a ‘Critical Psychiatry’ perspective, such as: ‘The Myth of Mental Illness’, the Marketing of Madness, the use of Psychiatry as social control, and Psychiatrists Legal Testimony being equivalent to that of ‘Whores of the Court’: “psychobabble with scientific foundations equal to horoscope charts… the science behind it all is nonexistent”.

[3] The total amount of advertising revenue received by your publication from Pharmaceutical Corporations per year, over the past five years.

Environment-Population: Dr. Michael Maher Ph.D thesis documents how the media censors the Environment Population Connection: How & Why Journalists Avoid the Environment-Population Connection (PDF)

Ecological Source of Political & Economic Problems: “The economic and political problems with which we concern ourselves are merely manifestations of our ecological predicament -- they are symptoms, not the disease.” – Chris Clugston: Scarcity: Humanity's Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Non-Renewable Natural Resources and its implications and consequences for humanity (NNR Scarcity) | US Naval Services Long-Term Study: Global Tipping Points on Food, Water, Energy, Pollution, Population, & Natural Resources & Population Explosion: The Most Powerful Force on Earth | 1996: US Army War College: Parameters: The Culture of Future Conflict: Overpopulation & Resource Scarcity will be the Direct Cause of Confrontation, Conflict, and War.

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: BM Tjugum | BA Borgen | B Bråthen | B Nærum | B Stefanussen | BT Nilsen | BA Veiding | BN Meling | B Haugseth

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Bente Mostad Tjugum | Berit Anne Borgen | Bjørn Bråthen | Bjørn Nærum | Bjørn Stefanussen | Bjørn Trygve Nilsen | Borgar Andreas Veiding | Brynjar N. Meling | Børge Haugseth

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: EH Olsen | E Drægebø | E Teigstad | E Kogstad | E Øen | E Hagen | ES Brodtkorb | EH Andenæs | ES Strømme

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Edel H. Olsen | Einar Drægebø | Eirik Teigstad | Eivind Kogstad | Eivor Øen | Elisabeth Hagen | Elisabeth Sejersted Brodtkorb | Ellen Holager Andenæs | Ellen Sandvold Strømme

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: MHE Haugland | M Randen | M Eiebakke | ME Nyland | M Skoklefald | M Lindbeck | M Engesbak | NC Hall | N Bjønness

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Marie Helene Earl Haugland | Marte Randen | Martin Eiebakke | Mette Ekroll Nyland | Mette Skoklefald | Monica Lindbeck | Morten Engesbak | Nadia Christina Hall Østby-Deglum | Nicolai Bjønness

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: KH Strømme | KL Haarr | K Morch | K Lykke | L Engdahl | LM Brimi | LS Børsand | LK Evju | MB Aas

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Knut Henrik Strømme | Kristin Larsen Haarr | Kristin Morch | Kristine Lykke | Lars Engdahl | Lilli Marie Brimi | Linda Solberg Børsand | Linn Kristin Evju | Maria Bergram Aas

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: J Hedenstad | J Johannessen | KN Nordtun | KES Høgevold | K Listerud | KA Øvereng | K Henriksen | KH Nilsen | KA Munkeby

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Jørgen Hedenstad | Jørn Johannessen | Kari Nessa Nordtun | Kari-Esther Selvaag Høgevold | Karianne Listerud | Karle Anders Øvereng | Karoline Henriksen | Kjetil H. Nilsen | Klaus Arne Munkeby

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: I Kjeldstad | I Blikra | I Sveen | JG Ronold | JA Aasen | JC Elden | JE Nygaard | J Kise | J Løken

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Ingunn Kjeldstad | Ivar Blikra | Ivar Sveen | Joakim Grude Ronold | John Arild Aasen | John Christian Elden | John Erik Nygaard | Jon Kise | Jostein Løken

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: HH Brørby | H Hjetland | H Hjort | HC Stærk | IG Lundemo | IJR Hansen | IM Støen | IM Sunde | IM Sperre

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Helge Heggen Brørby | Helge Hjetland | Helge Hjort | Hilde Camilla Stærk | Inger Grete Lundemo | Inger Johanne Reiestad Hansen | Inger Marie Støen | Inger Marie Sunde | Inger-Marie Sperre

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: S Ulstrup | T Korneliussen | TM Benestad | TH Eike | TE Andersen | T Helverschou | TS Mathiesen | TE Haug | TEB Larssen

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Sverre Ulstrup | Terje Korneliussen | Thomas Michael Benestad | Thor Harald Eike | Thor-Erik Andersen | Tom Helverschou | Tom Schjelderup Mathiesen | Tom Eivind Haug | Tom-Erik Bernø Larssen

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: GM Indreiten | H Winje | H Lilleby | HV Haug | HE Thorsberg | HR Steinholt | H Salomon | H Braanen | H Elness

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Gunn Marit Indreiten | Halldis Winje | Hanne Lilleby | Hans Vilhelm Haug | Hans-Erik Thorsberg | Hans-Richard Steinholt | Hege Salomon | Helene Braanen | Helene Elness

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: EK Holbye | ES Refsdal | Eva EJ Holm | FM Karlsen | F Wisth | GSG Lyng | GH Ahlgren | G Bergan | GI Midtbø

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Elna Kristin Holbye | Endre Skjelbred Refsdal | Eva Elisabeth Johnsen Holm | Flemming M. Karlsen | Frode Wisth | Gard SG Lyng | Gry Hege Ahlgren | Gunhild Bergan | Gunn Iren Midtbø

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc. Disciplinary Complaints: CU Bore | CP Grøndahl | C Nakstad | C Lundin | CF Ree | C Arnø | D Robertsen | D Steinfeld | DE Kjellnø

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Carl Urquieta Bore | Cathrine Pryser Grøndahl | Cecilie Nakstad | Christian Lundin | Christian Faye Ree | Christofer Arnø | Dag Robertsen | Dag Steinfeld | Dan Erik Kjellnø

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: TE Aansløkken | TM Mohn King | TM Wold | T Tveter | VR Nilssen | V Meland | Z Munir | Ø Aakerøy | Ø Vidhammer

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Trond Erik Aansløkken | Trude Marie Mohn King | Trude Marie Wold | Trygve Tveter | Verna Rege Nilssen | Vibeke Meland | Zulifqar Munir | Øyvind Aakerøy | Øyvind Vidhammer

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Advokat Disciplinary Board Complaints: Anne-Gry Rønning-Aaby | Borghild Fjeld Gylvik | Arne Seland | Ole Klanderud

Norsk Advokaten: Disciplinary Board: Anne-Gry Rønning-Aaby | Borghild Fjeld Gylvik | Arne Seland | Ole Klanderud

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”