Special Ops book confirms Manning/Wikileaks related Complaint to FBI, that Petraeus Fired to stop his support for Sustainable Security, exposing Nobel's “War is Peace” Fraud

Special Ops book confirms Manning/Wikileaks/Breivik related Complaint to FBI, that Petraeus was Fired to stop his support for Sustainable Security, exposing Nobel's “War is Peace” Fraud

Brandon Webb, a former Navy SEAL, and Jack Murphy, a former Green Beret, are authors of a new book 'Benghazi: The Definitive Report', where they allege Petraeus was taken down in a 'palace coup' by high-level intelligence officers who did not like the way he was running the CIA. On 19 November 2012, a submission to Washington DC FBI Director, James McJunkin, submitted evidence that FBI's Petraeus-Broadwell investigation was used as a convenient excuse to fire Petraeus, to prevent Petraeus from implementing a Sustainable Security Peace Plan, submitted to the CIA, as part of court documents, involving Wikileaks and Pfc Manning; on 15 October 2012.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Michael Zennie | Brandon Webb | Jack Murphy | 12 February 2013

Norway v. Breivik References in US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces & Supreme Court Applications

Norway v. Breivik References in USCAAF (CCR v USA) & US Supreme Court (Alien v. RCFP) Applications

References to Media's abuse of publicity power in Norway v. Breivik: USCAAF: Founding Affidavit (pg.51-61) & Amicus Curiae (pg.26-27; 28); Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari (pg.30)

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Ecofeminist vs. Breivik | 04 November 2012

[112] Subsequent to the Oslo District Court‘s 24 August Judgement, finding Mr. Breivik sane and guilty, the applicant filed a RH Ecofeminist Ecocentric Wild Law Sustainable Security application for Review[106] of parts of the Patriarchal Anthropocentric Judgement, specifically for orders to [A.1] Set Aside the Judgements "Necessity (Nødrett) Ruling"; and [A.2] Set Aside Defendant‘s Conviction (Finding of Guilt) and Remit to Oslo District Court for hearing of Further Evidence to conclude Objective and Subjective Necessity Test Evidentiary Enquiry, and to ... [B] Set Aside the Judgements Failure to disclose the pending Judicial Ethics violation complaint against Rettens Leder: Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen, filed on 06 June 2012 to the Secretariat for the Supervisory Committee for Judges, as a violation of Aarhus Convention Article 3.(3)(4)(5) principles, and general ECHR public accountability Transparency (Lithgow & others v United Kingdom) principles.

[113] The grounds for the application being that: [A.1.a] Necessity Judgement fails to provide any necessity criminal provisions that prohibit killing of Government Officials in case of Necessity; [A.1.b] Necessity Judgement Ignores that Criminal Necessity provisions do not prohibit the killing of Government Officials in case of objective and subjective Necessity; [A.1.c] Necessity Judgements Erroneous interpretation of Necessity related criminal law provisions and international necessity related human rights law; [A.1.d] Necessity and Guilt Judgements Failure to conduct required Objective and Subjective Tests for Defendant‘s Necessity Defence; [A.1.e] Necessity and Guilt Judgements Absence of Objective and Subjective Test Enquiry and Conclusions Renders it Inadequate; [A.1.f] Necessity and Guilt Judgements Absence of Clarification Upon which party the Onus of Proof lies in a Case of Necessity; and how or why their evidence was insufficient renders the Judgements Conclusions inadequate; [A.1.g] Necessity and Guilt Judgements Absence of Objective and Subjective Test Enquiry and Conclusions Renders it a Discriminatory Precedent; [A.1.i] Necessity Judgements "Extreme Political Objectives" conclusion is unsupported in the Absence of Objective and Subjective Necessity Test; and is a Masculine (Reason and Logic) Insecurity Left vs. Right Wing Blame Game Parasite Leeching Polarization – not a Matriarchal Ecological and Psychological Integrity Root Cause Problem Solving – conclusion.