NO v. Breivik :: Uncensored: * Radical Honesty

Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Problem Solving: Poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc; are some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources.

Ecology of Peace RH factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate & sign their responsible freedom oaths; to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as international law; to require all citizens of all races, religions and nations to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are updated at EoP MILED Clerk.

Showing posts with label * Radical Honesty. Show all posts

Monday, May 28, 2012

Complaint against Chief Justice Tore Schei: Violation of CCBE Code of Ethics

Complaint against Chief Justice Tore Schei: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation)

29-05-12: 10:54: Response from Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
29-05-12: 12:02: Response to Adv. For. Disciplinary Committee
29-05-12: 12:57: Response from Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
29-05-12: 12:57: Response to Adv. For. Disciplinary Committee
29-05-12: 13:33: Response from Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
29-05-12: 13:33: Response to Adv. For. Disciplinary Committee

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 28 May 2012

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 12:18 PM
To: 'Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints'; 'Disciplinary Committee'; 'Judge Moe'
Cc: 'Court Administration'; 'Dep.Sec.Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard'; 'Norway Supreme Court Admin'; 'Ch.Justice Tore Schei'
Subject: Klage: Tore Schei: Brudd på: 2.1, 2.2, 2,4 og 4,1 CCBEs etiske regler | Complaint: Tore Schei: Violation of: 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 & 4,1 of CCBE Code of Ethics

Disciplinary Complaints
The Norwegian Bar Association | Den Norske Advokatforening
Email: Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints (**@advokatforeningen.no)

Head: Judge Ernst Moe
Sec: Beate Sundstrøm
Disciplinary Committee | Disiplinærnemnden
Disciplinary Committee: (**@jus.no)
E-post: Judge Moe (**@domstol.no)

CC: Chief Justice Tore Schei
c/o: Dep. Sec. Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard
Norway Supreme Court | Norges Høyesterett
E-post: Norway Supreme Court Admin (**@hoyesterett.no)
E-post: Ch.Justice Tore Schei (**@hoyesterett.no)

Complaint against Chief Justice Tore Schei: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation) | Klage mot dommer Tore Schei Brudd på: 2.1 (Uavhengighet), 2.2 (ærlighet), 2,4 (Multiculti Juridisk Respekt) og 4,1 (Rule of Law gjennomføre) CCBEs etiske regler (norsk oversettelse)

Complaint against Kjersti Buun Nygaard: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation)

29-05-12: 11:02: Response from 'Disiplinærnemnden for advokater'
29-05-12: 12:11: Response to Adv. For. Disciplinary Committee
29-05-12: 13:03: Response from 'Disiplinærnemnden for advokater'
29-05-12: 13:03: Response to Adv. For. Disciplinary Committee
29-05-12: 13:37: Response from 'Disiplinærnemnden for advokater'
29-05-12: 13:37: Response to Adv. For. Disciplinary Committee
29-05-12: 16:26: Response from 'Disiplinærnemnden for advokater'
29-05-12: 16:26: Response to Adv. For. Disciplinary Committee

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 28 May 2012

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 12:10 PM
To: 'Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints'; 'Disciplinary Committee'; 'Judge Moe'
Cc: 'Court Administration'; 'Dep.Sec.Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard'
Subject: Klage: Kjersti Buun Nygaard: Brudd på: 2.1, 2.2, 2,4 og 4,1 CCBEs etiske regler | Complaint: Kjersti Buun Nygaard: Violation of: 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 & 4,1 of CCBE Code of Ethics

Disciplinary Complaints
The Norwegian Bar Association | Den Norske Advokatforening
Email: Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints (**@advokatforeningen.no)

Head: Judge Ernst Moe
Sec: Beate Sundstrøm
Disciplinary Committee | Disiplinærnemnden
Disciplinary Committee: (**@jus.no)
E-post: Judge Moe (**@domstol.no)

CC: Dep. Sec. Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard
Court Administration | Domstol Administrasjonen
E-post: Court Administration (**@domstoladministrasjonen.no)
E-post: Dep.Sec.Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard (**@hoyesterett.no)

Complaint against Deputy Secretary General: Kjersti Buun Nygaard: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation) | Klage mot dommer Tore Schei Brudd på: 2.1 (Uavhengighet), 2.2 (ærlighet), 2,4 (Multiculti Juridisk Respekt) og 4,1 (Rule of Law gjennomføre) CCBEs etiske regler (norsk oversettelse)

Complaint against Judge Wenche Arntzen: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation)

29-05-12: 11:05: Response from Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
29-05-2012: 12:19: Response to Adv. For. Disciplinary Committee
29-05-12: 13:08: Response from Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
29-05-2012: 13:08: Response to Adv. For. Disciplinary Committee
29-05-12: 13:39: Response from Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
29-05-2012: 13:39: Response to Adv. For. Disciplinary Committee

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 28 May 2012

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 12:05 PM
To: 'Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints'; 'Disciplinary Committee'; 'Judge Moe'
Cc: NO: Crt: Breivik: Oslo District Court (**@domstol.no); NO Oslo District Court: Admin (**@domstol.no); Judge Wenche Arntzen (**@domstol.no)
Subject: Klage: Wenche E Arntzen: Brudd på: 2.1, 2.2, 2,4 og 4,1 CCBEs etiske regler | Complaint: Wenche E Arntzen: Violation of: 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 & 4,1 of CCBE Code of Ethics

Disciplinary Complaints
The Norwegian Bar Association | Den Norske Advokatforening
Email: Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints (**@advokatforeningen.no)

Head: Judge Ernst Moe
Sec: Beate Sundstrøm
Disciplinary Committee | Disiplinærnemnden
Disciplinary Committee: (**@jus.no)
E-post: Judge Moe (**@domstol.no)

CC: Judge Wenche Elisabeth Arntzen
c/o Registrar of the Oslo District Court
E-post: **@domstol.no, **@domstol.no
E-post: Judge Wenche Arntzen (**@domstol.no)

Complaint against Judge Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation) | Klage mot dommer Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen Brudd på: 2.1 (Uavhengighet), 2.2 (ærlighet), 2,4 (Multiculti Juridisk Respekt) og 4,1 (Rule of Law gjennomføre) CCBEs etiske regler (norsk oversettelse)

Complaint against Judge Nina Opsahl: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation)

29-05-12: 11:17: Response from Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
29-05-12: 12:25: Response to Adv. For. Disciplinary Committee
29-05-12: 13:11: Response from Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
29-05-12: 13:11: Response to Adv. For. Disciplinary Committee
29-05-12: 13:41: Response from Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
29-05-12: 13:41: Response to Adv. For. Disciplinary Committee

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 28 May 2012

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 12:02 PM
To: 'Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints'; 'Disciplinary Committee'; 'Judge Moe'
Cc: NO: Crt: Breivik: Oslo District Court (**@domstol.no); NO Oslo District Court: Admin (**@domstol.no); Judge Nina Opsahl (**@domstol.no)
Subject: Klage: Nina Opsahl: Brudd på: 2.1, 2.2, 2,4 og 4,1 CCBEs etiske regler | Complaint: Nina Opsahl: Violation of: 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 & 4,1 of CCBE Code of Ethics

Disciplinary Complaints
The Norwegian Bar Association | Den Norske Advokatforening
Email: Adv.For. Disciplinary Complaints (**@advokatforeningen.no)

Head: Judge Ernst Moe
Sec: Beate Sundstrøm
Disciplinary Committee | Disiplinærnemnden
Disciplinary Committee: (**@jus.no)
E-post: Judge Moe (**@domstol.no)

CC: Judge Nina Opsahl
c/o Registrar of the Oslo District Court
E-post: **@domstol.no, **@domstol.no
E-post: Judge Nina Opsahl (**@domstol.no)

Complaint against Judge Nina Opsahl: Violation of: 2.1 (Independence), 2.2 (Honesty), 2.4 (Multiculti Legal Respect) & 4,1 (Rule of Law Conduct) of CCBE Code of Ethics (Norwegian translation) | Klage mot dommer Nina Opsahl Brudd på: 2.1 (Uavhengighet), 2.2 (ærlighet), 2,4 (Multiculti Juridisk Respekt) og 4,1 (Rule of Law gjennomføre) CCBEs etiske regler (norsk oversettelse)

BBC: Lis Goril Anda: Complaint: Irregular Failure to Disclose Relevant Biases and Critical Psychiatry Perspectives in "Breivik trial forces Norway to look again at insanity"

BBC: Lis Goril Anda: Complaint: Irregular Failure to Disclose Relevant Biases and Critical Psychiatry Perspectives in "Breivik trial forces Norway to look again at insanity"

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Habeus Mentem | 04 May 2012

From: Habeus Mentem
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 10:55 PM
To: 'BBC: Liss Goril Anda'
Cc: UK: BBC: Gavin Esler; UK: BBC Complaints: Helen Boaden; UK: BBC: Newsnight News Ed: Sarah Teasdale
Subject: BBC: Lis Goril Anda: Complaint: Breivik-Sanity: Irregular Failure to Disclose Relevant Biases

Ms. Liss Goril Anda
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
BBC Television Centre
Wood Lane
London
W12 7RJ

Dear Ms. Anda,

Please find attached PDF: ** BBC: Lis Goril Anda: Request for Information: Irregular Failure to Disclose Relevant Biases and Critical Psychiatry Perspectives in "Breivik trial forces Norway to look again at insanity" **

It contains the full version of my complaint submitted to the BBC at:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/make_complaint_step1n.shtml

------------
Complaint/Request to BBC/Ms. Anda,

Complaint: Request for Information/Corrections:

1. Reasons for your failure to disclose your bias towards Breivik’s sanity [previous Radical Secularist post referring to him as a madman]

2. Reasons for your failure to disclose Critical Psychiatry criticism of legal definitions of ‘insanity’ as ‘Psychiatry’s takeover of the legal system with psychobabble with scientific foundations equal to horoscope charts’ (Margaret Hagen, Ph.D: Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony)

3. Reasons for your failure to disclose Psychiatry / Psychology / DSM links to Pharmaceutical Corporations who effectively are the final arbiters as to definitions of horoscope chart ‘insanity’ (Marketing of Madness Documentary)

4. Reasons for your failure to disclose BBC’s yearly advertising income from the Pharmaceutical Industry

5. If it is true Norwegians treasure Openness and Freedom of Expression; why is there blanket Censorship of the Acquittal or Firing Squad: ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection Report? (http://bit.ly/JqLCKE)

Full Written Complaint in PDF with Greater Detail available at:
http://bit.ly/JjYEpR

-----------------

If you are not a Pharmaceutical Public Relations Propaganda Churnalist[1] Whore[2]; I look forward to your response and corrections.

Radical Honesty Correspondence & Additional Psychotronic Reference Info

02 September 2011

TO: Health Provisions Council of SA
TO: Professional Board for Psychology
TO: Institute of Christian Psychology
TO: Psychological Soc. Of South Africa
CC: Karin Osler, Center for Conscious Leadership
CC: Office of the Surgeon General, Department of Defence
CC: Cheryl Welsh, Cahra,
CC: Dr. Nick Begich, Earthpulse Press Incorporated
CC: Institute of Social Psychology
CC: Vladimir Bukovsky
CC: John Scull & Dennis Fox, Intnl Comm for Eco Psych & Fox Professing
CC: Thomas Szaszz, MD & Prof. JA. Schaler
CC: Brad Blanton, Ph.D, Center for Radical Honesty
CC: Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, Warrior Science Group

Sirs & Ladies,

Request for Info: Contact Details for SA Psychologist with theoretical and kinaesthetic experience in: Radical Honesty, Gestalt, Psychodrama, Psychotronics, Political and Legal Activism against the Edward Bernaysian Psychological Tyranny as depicted in ‘Century of the Self’, ‘Marketing of Madness’, ‘Psychiatry: An Industry of Death’.

Radical Honesty Debate: Norway v. Breivik/Berwick: Application to Chief Justice Tore Schei ITO Article 85: Treason

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 3:56 PM
To: Chief Justice Tore Schei; Norway Embassy; Mark Laity SHAPE; Geir Lippestad; Tord Jordet, Odd Ivar Gron, Bente Svendsen
Cc: Lt. Gen. André Blattmann; Fursten Gloria von Thurn & Taxis; Deputy Judge Advocate General, JAG; Norwegian Intelligence Service; Swedish Security Service; Lt. Col. Dave. Grossman; NGA-Pathfinder; Kremlin News Sender Service; Dept. of Defence: Media; XE/Blackwater; The Dossier; Bundesnachrichtendienst; Peggy Noonan; Brad Blanton
Subject: Norway v. Breivik/Berwick: Application to Chief Justice Tore Schei ITO Article 85: Treason

TO: Chief Justice Tore Schei

TO: King Harald V, PM Stoltenberg & Pres Andersen,
c/o: HE Mr Tor Christian Hildan, Ambassador, Royal Norwegian Embassy

TO: General Harald Sunde
NATO: Military Committee: Chief of Staff
Chief of Defence, Norway
c/o: Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Secretary General, North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO)
via: Mark Laity, Chief of Strategic Communications, Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE)

TO: Geir Lippestad
Advokatfirmaet Lippestad AS

IN THE OSLO - Alt for Norge – SUPREME COURT

OF THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY

“There never was an idea stated that woke men out of their stupid indifference but its originator was spoken of as a crank.”
~ US Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes ~

In the matter between:

KINGDOM OF NORWAY

And

ANDERS BEIHRING BREVICK
(AKA ANDREW BERWICK, SIGURD JORSALFAR)

LARA JOHNSTONE
(AKA ANDREA MUHRRTEYN, FRANCIS MARION BRAIDFUTE)

Plaintiff

1st Defendant

2nd Defendant

Application in terms of Article 85 of Norwegian Constitution, as laid down on 17 May 1814 by the Constituent Assembly at Eidsvoll and subsequently amended, most recently on 20 February 2007: Any person who obeys an order the purpose of which is to disturb the liberty and security of the Storting is thereby guilty of treason.

Please find attached aforementioned application and its annexures:

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, THE HAGUE: COMPLAINT ITO ART.15 OF ROME STATUTE: RE: Communication and Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute: Charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute. (PDF)

Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’; in terms of Criminal Procedure Act 51, of 1977: § 213: Proof of Written Statement by Consent; & § 171 & 172: Evidence on Commission (www.1984-2-1776.co.nr)

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

:: Fair Use Notice ::

FAIR USE NOTICE: The Norway v. Breivik blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the EcoFeminist vs. Breivik: Beyond Left and Right Wing: From an ecological perspective, all human economics and politics are irrelevant’ Argument. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to Norway v. Breivik Blog at: [EcoFeminist]


KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV	Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)

US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan	Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)

2006: US Army Strategy for Environment	CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]

Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future	Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]

NO v. Breivik :: Uncensored

Note to Readers:

Monday, May 28, 2012

Complaint against Chief Justice Tore Schei: Violation of CCBE Code of Ethics

Complaint against Kjersti Buun Nygaard: Violation of CCBE Code of Ethics

Complaint against Judge Wenche Arntzen: Violation of CCBE Code of Ethics

Complaint against Judge Nina Opsahl: Violation of CCBE Code of Ethics

Saturday, May 5, 2012

BBC: Lis Goril Anda: Complaint: Irregular Failure to Disclose Relevant Biases and Critical Psychiatry Perspectives in "Breivik trial forces Norway to look again at insanity"

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Radical Honesty Correspondence & Additional Psychotronic Reference Info

Friday, July 29, 2011

Radical Honesty Debate: Norway v. Breivik/Berwick: Application to Chief Justice Tore Schei ITO Article 85: Treason

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

:: Fair Use Notice ::