16 May: EcoFeminist Death Battalion Notice: Interpol Environmental Crimes Charges against Norwegian Supreme Court Chief Justice Tore Schei and Dep Sec Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard

16 May: EcoFeminist Death Battalion Notice: Interpol Environmental Crimes Charges against Norwegian Supreme Court Chief Justice Tore Schei and Dep Sec Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard

“The economic and political problems with which we concern ourselves are merely manifestations of our ecological predicament -- they are symptoms, not the disease.” – Chris Clugston: Scarcity: Humanity's Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Non-Renewable Natural Resources and its implications and consequences for humanity

“If the men refuse to fight for Rule of Ecological Law, we’ll show them what the women can do!” - Maria Bochkareva, Russian Joan of Arc: “Black Hussars Battalion of Death”

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 17 May 2012

From: Habeus Mentem
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 7:41 PM
To: Crt: SupremeCrt: Chief Justice Tore Schei (**@domstoladministrasjonen.no); Crt: SupremeCrt: Kjersti Ruud (**@hoyesterett.no) ; Crt: SupremeCrt: Info: Svein Tore Andersen (**@hoyesterett.no); NO: Crt: Breivik: Oslo District Court (**@domstol.no); NO Oslo District Court: Admin (**@domstol.no)
Cc: NO: Crt: Breivik: Lippestad (**@advokatlippestad.no); NO: Lippestad (**@advokatlippestad.no); NO: Lippestad (**@advokatlippestad.no); Crt: Victims: Siv Hallgren (**@elden.no); Crt: Victims: Frode Elgesem (**@thommessen.no); Crt: Victims: Mette Yvonne Larsen (**@advokatstabell.no); Crt: Pros Holden. MJus: Grete Faremo (**@jd.dep.no); Crt: Pros Holden. Politie: Org.Crime (**@politiet.no)
Subject: NO Supreme Crt: T.Schei & K.Nygaard: Obstruction of Environmental Justice Complaint to Interpol

TO: Chief Justice Tore Schei & Dep. Sec. Gen: Kjersti Nygaard
Norway Supreme Court

CC: Prosecution, Defence, Victims Families

Please find attached PDF Complaint:

Environmental Crime Complaint to Interpol, via Norway Police
Charges: Obstruction of Environmental & Indigenous Rights Justice
Committed by Chief Justice Tore Schei & Dep. Sec. Gen: Kjersti Nygaard

COMPLAINT: Charges of Obstruction of Access to Environmental & Indigenous Rights Justice, by Norwegian Chief Justice Tore Schei and Dep Sec Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, EcoFeminist
P O Box 5042, George East, 6539
South Africa Cel: (071) 170 1954
Email: **@mweb.co.za

NO Supreme Crt: Dep Sec Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard Response to EcoFeminist Indigenous Rights Application to Norway Supreme Court in Breivik Matter

NO Supreme Crt: Dep Sec Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard Response to EcoFeminist Indigenous Rights Application to Norway Supreme Court in Breivik Matter

Judgement from the Oslo District Court: My legal application (per ecolaw email) - Affidavit part C: District Court Monocultural Masculine Insecurity EU Supremacy, paragraphs 30 to 36 - informs you of the Judgement from the Oslo District Court which could politely be paraphrased as ‘Judge Opshal and Arntzen don’t have the honour and integrity to officially deny Johnstone’s application, let alone provide her with written reasons for why we are denying it, cause Johnstone practices problem solving, not parasite leeching, so Johnstone has fuck all followers, to force us to do our jobs, so we will just pretend Johnstone does not exist, hence Johnstone's applications to this court also don’t exist’.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 15 May 2012

From: Andrea Muhrrteyn
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:40 PM
To: DO-B: Muslim Soc Trondheim (**@msit.no); DO-B: Muslim Soc Trondheim: Imam (**@msit.no); DO-B: Muslim Soc Trondheim: Mehran Emadipour (**@hotmail.com)
Subject: [11.MuslimSocTrondheim.JJOksvold] NO Supreme Crt: Dep Sec Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard Response to SHARP Application

TO: [11] MUSLIM SOC. OF TRONDHEIM: JJ OKSVOLD

[04] NO REFUGEE COUNCIL: ELISABETH RASMUSSEN [05] UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR: INDIGENOUS RIGHTS: JAMES ANAYA [06] ELENA: LEG.ADV: FRIHAGEN, RISNES, BLEKASTAD, DAHL [07] ELENA: NOAS: ANDREAS FURUSETH [08] MINISTER OF CULTURE: ANNIKEN HUITFELDT [09] PROGRESS PARTY: SIV JENSEN [10] CHURCH OF NORWAY: BERIT HAGEN AGOY [11] MUSLIM SOC. OF TRONDHEIM: JJ OKSVOLD [12] NUPI: HELGE LURAS

Please find attached my PDF response to Supreme Court: Deputy Secretary General: Kjersti Buun Nygaard refusal to provide a case number for my case.

(I) Error in Supreme Court: Deputy Secretary General: Kjersti Buun Nygaard Response to SHARP Application to Supreme Court for Declaratory Orders and Review of Oslo District Court’s Decisions; (II) Notice of Commencement of Hungerstrike in absence of Supreme Court Case number by 17:00 on 22 May 2012.

PDF Includes:

In the absence of notification of Supreme Court case number for my SHARP application for two Declaratory Orders and Review of Oslo District Court’s decisions (judgements), by 17:00 hrs on 22 May 2012, the applicant shall embark on a liquids only hungerstrike.

Previous Hungerstrikes Background Information:

* 1999: Support for CA Dept of Corrections Investigation of Demian Johnson 'black guerrilla' Gang Label
* 2001: Support for Pres. Bush & 400 Military & Government Disclosure Project Witnesses
* 2003: Support for Radical Honoursty Disclosure of Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS


Respectfully,

LARA JOHNSTONE, Pro Se
PO Box 5042 George East,
South Africa
Tel/Fax: (044) --- ----
Email: **@mweb.co.za

Norway Supreme Crt Update: Min Culture: Is Norway (A) a Children-of-Rainbow Legal Multiculti (right to invoke Sharia?) State; or (B) Monocultural Indigenous EU Supremacy Legal Hegemonic State?

Norway Min Culture: Is Norway (A) a Children-of-Rainbow Legal Multiculti (right to invoke Sharia?) State; or (B) Monocultural Indigenous EU Supremacy Legal Hegemonic State?

Application Requests Supreme Court to Order the Norwegian Ministry of Culture to act in accordance to European Court of Human Rights ruling in Lithgow & others v. United Kingdom, and clarify in adequately accessible and sufficiently precise statement; whether Norway is (A) a ‘Children of the Rainbow’ State legally committed to Multiculturalism, providing all cultures their right to invoke cultural law and hence granting the Applicant her rights to invoke Radical Honoursty cultural law; or (B) a Monocultural Indigenous European Supremacy Legal Hegemonic State, and that the Labour Party Immigration policy is a tactic to maintain their grip on power, by importing Non-Western immigrants as Labour Party vote-fodder.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | 10 May 2012 | Norway v. Breivik

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:49 PM
To: Crt: SupremeCrt: Chief Justice Tore Schei (**@domstoladministrasjonen.no); Crt: SupremeCrt: Kjersti Ruud (**@hoyesterett.no) ; Crt: SupremeCrt: Info: Svein Tore Andersen (**@hoyesterett.no) [SS]
Subject: NO Supreme Crt: Justice Schei, c/o K.Ruud & ST.Andersen: NO-Breivik: Supreme Crt Applic for Review & Decl. Order

Chief Justice Tore Schei
Post: Postboks 5678 Sluppen 7485 Trondheim
Telefon: 73 56 70 00 | Telefaks: 73 56 70 01

I am still awaiting the Court Registrar to provide me with a Case Number.

Attached are the updated 10 May 2012 Filing Sheet, Notice of Motion, Founding Affidavit and Proof of Service PDF's, with updated respondents.

ORIGINAL PARTY RESPONDENTS:

[01] KINGDOM OF NORWAY Prosecution
[02] VICTIMS FAMILIES
[03] ANDERS BEIHRING BREVICK Defendant

The other Respondents are:

Part A:

[04] NO REFUGEE COUNCIL: ELISABETH RASMUSSEN
[05] UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR: INDIGENOUS RIGHTS: JAMES ANAYA
[06] ELENA: LEG.ADV: FRIHAGEN, RISNES, BLEKASTAD, DAHL
[07] ELENA: NOAS: ANDREAS FURUSETH

Part B:

[08] MINISTER OF CULTURE: ANNIKEN HUITFELDT
[09] PROGRESS PARTY: SIV JENSEN
[10] CHURCH OF NORWAY: BERIT HAGEN AGOY
[11] MUSLIM SOC. OF TRONDHEIM: JJ OKSVOLD
[12] NUPI: HELGE LURAS

Part C:

[13] JUDGE NINA OPSAHL
[14] JUDGE WENCHE ELIZABETH ARNTZEN

Response: ELENA: Adv. Carl Rieber-Mohn: Is Norway (A) a Children-of-Rainbow Legal Multiculti (right to invoke Sharia?) State; or (B) Monocultural Indigenous EU Supremacy Legal Hegemonic State?

Response: ELENA: Adv. Carl Rieber-Mohn: Is Norway (A) a Children-of-Rainbow Legal Multiculti (right to invoke Sharia?) State; or (B) Monocultural Indigenous EU Supremacy Legal Hegemonic State?

Current EU law require 'refugee/asylum seeker' to lie to get tourist visa | If the NO Min. of Culture decide that Norway is "(A) a ‘Children of the Rainbow’ State legally committed to Multiculturalism, providing all cultures their right to invoke cultural law, then Applicant could invoke Radical Honoursty cultural law | or NO Min of Culture could decide Norway is not nearly as committed to Legal Multiculturalism as 'racist' Apartheid were (i.e. that Liberal Norway is legally way more 'racist' towards other cultures, than Apartheid ever was); by deciding that Norway is (B) a Monocultural Indigenous European Supremacy Legal Hegemonic State, and that the Labour Party Immigration policy is a tactic to maintain their grip on power, by importing Non-Western immigrants as Labour Party vote-fodder.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 07 May 2012

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 12:28 AM
TO: 'Carl K. Rieber-Mohn'
CC: DO-A: ELENA: ABWIIG: Frihagen (**@abwiig.no); DO-A: ELENA: ABWIIG: Risnes (**@abwiig.no); DO-A: ELENA: Dahl (**@online.no); DO-A: ELENA: Furuholmen: Signe Blekastad (**@adv-furuholmen.no); DO-A: ELENA: Furuholmen: Trond Olsen Naess (**@adv-furuholmen.no); DO-A: ELENA: Arild Humlen (**@hrmlegal.no); DO-A: ELENA: Furuholmen: Office (**@adv-furuholmen.no); DO-A: ELENA: Bente Tjugum (**@adv-hst.no); DO-A: ELENA: Midsem (**@advokatmidsem.no); DO-A: ELENA: Mette Lisbeth Jensen (**@advokatmlj.no); DO-A: ELENA: NOAS: Andreas Furuseth (**@noas.org); DO-A: ELENA: NOAS (**@noas.org); DO-A: ELENA: Redet: Thor Gardarsson (**@advokatredet.no); DO-A: NO Refugee Council: Elisabeth Rasmussen (**@nrc.no); DO-A: NO Refugee Council: Office (**@nrc.no)
Subject: RE: [ELENA: Adv A.Humlen & C.Rieber-Mohn] NO-Breivik: Supreme Crt Applic for Review & Decl. Order

Dear Mr. Rieber-Mohn,

CC: ELENA: NORWAY: LAWYERS PROVIDING ADVICE Parties

Thank you for your response: "This is no matter for lawyers in the ELENA network in Norway. We mat assist in refugee cases etc. Sorry"

Could you clarify your statement, by answering the following questions, please.

1. Did you read the full notice of motion and Affidavit, Sir?

2. Do you agree: the 2010 ECRE: ELENA brochure states on pages 80-81 "Asylum seekers can seek asylum at the border control at the airport or Storskog, the only Norwegian external Schengen land border station, or any international port, and should do so immediately upon arrival... [..] All asylum seekers will be given free legal assistance by the lawyer of his or her choice if they are not granted a residence permit at the time a negative decision is made, and he or she will have the possibility to appeal the decision. [..] Upon arrival asylum seekers are given legal information by NOAS, an NGO given this task by the Directorate of Immigration. [..] If receiving a negative decision every asylum seeker will receive free legal aid by an independent lawyer. [..] Free legal aid is given by the state according to standardised rates. If deemed necessary due to the complexity of the case further legal aid will be given upon application. The lawyer will make necessary applications. Under the legal aid system the lawyer has the duty to give assistance that is deemed necessary. 4. Legal aid is rarely given to try cases before the national courts. The Norwegian Bar Association is running a project to have more negative decisions tried by the courts. Cases are being presented to a committee which will recommend cases to be brought before the courts on a no cure-no pay basis by experienced lawyers."

3. Do you agree that current European-culture 'Refugee and Asylum law' requires an immigrant to lie/commit fraud in acquiring the relevant fraudulent tourist visa to physically arrive “at the border control at the airport or Storskog, the only Norwegian external Schengen land border station, or any international port, and should do so immediately upon arrival”?

Min Justice: Is Norway (A) a Children-of-Rainbow Legal Multiculti (right to invoke Sharia?) State; or (B) Monocultural Indigenous EU Supremacy Legal Hegemonic State?

Min Justice: Is Norway (A) a Children-of-Rainbow Legal Multiculti (right to invoke Sharia?) State; or (B) Monocultural Indigenous EU Supremacy Legal Hegemonic State?

Application Requests Supreme Court to Order the Norwegian Ministry of Culture to act in accordance to European Court of Human Rights ruling in Lithgow & others v. United Kingdom, and clarify in adequately accessible and sufficiently precise statement; whether Norway is (A) a ‘Children of the Rainbow’ State legally committed to Multiculturalism, providing all cultures their right to invoke cultural law and hence granting the Applicant her rights to invoke Radical Honoursty cultural law; or (B) a Monocultural Indigenous European Supremacy Legal Hegemonic State, and that the Labour Party Immigration policy is a tactic to maintain their grip on power, by importing Non-Western immigrants as Labour Party vote-fodder.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 07 May 2012

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 12:31 PM
To: Crt: SupremeCrt: Chief Justice Tore Schei (**@hoyesterett.no); Crt: SupremeCrt: Kjersti Ruud (**@hoyesterett.no)
Subject: [NO SUPREME CRT: Justice Tore Schei] NO-Breivik: Supreme Crt Applic for Review & Decl. Order

TO: Chief Justice Tore Schei
Post: Postboks 5678 Sluppen 7485 Trondheim
Telefon: 73 56 70 00 | Telefaks: 73 56 70 01


IN THE NORWAY SUPREME COURT: NORWAY V. BREIVIK

NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER & REVIEW

Oslo District Court Case #: 11-188627 MED-05

In the Application of:

LARA JOHNSTONE
Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Radical Honoursty African EcoFeminist White Refugee

In the matter between:

KINGDOM OF NORWAY V. ANDERS BREIVIK

Please find attached the following [PDF] for Application to the Norway Supreme Court in this matter:

* NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER & REVIEW: Application in terms of Article’s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b, of Norwegian Constitution; and Article’s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“ECHR”) and Rule 44 § 2 of the Rules of the Court

* Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone, Jus Sanguinis Radical Honoursty African EcoFeminist White Refugee

* Annex A: The Applicants 30 November 2011 Application to the Oslo District Court: Application for a Writ of [I] Habeus Mentem on behalf of Anders Breivik psycho-cultural integrity right to a free and fair trial; and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review of the Psychiatric Evaluation Report of Psychiatrists: Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby as to the Mens Rea political necessity criminal liability of Anders Breivik terrorist acts, on 22 July 2011.

* Annex B: The Applicants 15 April 2012 Application to the Oslo District Court: Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amicus Curiae for an Order (1) to approve the Applicant as an In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amici Curiae, and (2) Amending the Charges Against the Defendant [Breivik] and Applicant [Johnstone] to include Treason in terms of Article 85 of Norwegian Constitution, and if found guilty, in a free and fair trial; to be executed by firing squad.

* PROOF OF SERVICE Affidavit of Lara Johnstone

Breivik: Acquittal or Firing Squad?? :: ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ :: Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection

Breivik: Acquittal or Firing Squad?? :: ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ :: Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection

Pasthtun Pakistani & Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist | Better an Honest Enemy; than a False Friend | Scientific Journalism Media Censorship Case Studies | CENSORED: The War You Don’t See: Scientific Journalism Campaign | If It Bleads, It Leads :: Media Population-Terrorism Connection: Mainstream Access-to-Discourse Editors censorship of non-violent political grievances and problem solving activism facilitate a pressure cooker socio-political reality for their ‘If it Bleads, It Leads’ corporate propaganda profits | Whores of the Court :: The Myth of Mental Illness

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 23 April 2012

From: Habeus Mentem
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 1:17 AM
To: NO: Crt: Breivik: Lippestad (**@advokatlippestad.no); NO: Lippestad (**@advokatlippestad.no); NO: Lippestad (**@advokatlippestad.no); HM: MP: IvarJohansen (**@ivarjohansen.no)
Cc: Pros Holden (**@jd.dep.no) ; Pros Holden (**@jd.dep.no); Pros Holden (**@jd.dep.no); Pros Holden: Moren Ruud (**@jd.dep.no); Pros Holden: Politiet (**@politiet.no); Pros Holden: Oslo Politiet (**@namsfogden.no); Pros Holden: Dir. Police (@politiet.no); Pros Holden: Politiet (**@politiet.no); NO: Emb: Pta: Amb Tor Hildan (**@mfa.no); NO: Prison: Ila: Knut Bjarkeid (**@kriminalomsorg.no); NO: Prison: Ila: Knut Bjarkeid (**@ilafengsel.no)
Subject: NO v Breivik :: 11-188627 MED-05 | ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ :: Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection


TO: NORWAY: Prosecutor Svein Holden (C/O Police & Dept. of Justice)
TO: DEFENDANT: Anders Breivik


IN THE OSLO DISTRICT COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY
Case: 11-188627 MED-05

22 April 2012 :: Earth Day

Acquittal or Firing Squad??

‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ :: Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection

Pasthtun Pakistani & Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist
Better an Honest Enemy; than a False Friend
Scientific Journalism Media Censorship Case Studies

Media's Anders Breivik Narrative:
* Breivik is legally insane
* His ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ justification for 22/07 Terrorism is Unjustified

Media Censor:
* Whores of the Court: The Myth of Mental Illness: Insanity is to PharmaPsychiatry what Heresy was to the Inquisition
* Media’s If It Bleads, It Leads Population-Terrorism Connection

*************

Please find attached in PDF:

* ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’: Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection

Enclosure:
* Margaret Hagen, Ph.D (Harvard): Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony (From: http://whoresofthecourt.com/)

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone
Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored
http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com

Nelson Mandela Foundation are Silent about ICC TRC Fraud Genocide Complaint against Mandela, submitted as Evidence to Norway v. Breivik Trial

Nelson Mandela Foundation are Silent about ICC TRC Fraud Genocide Complaint against Mandela, submitted as Evidence to Norway v. Breivik Trial

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 17 April 2012

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 11:03 PM
To: 'Nelson Mandela Foundation'
Cc: 'Verne Sheldon Harris'; 'Spokesperson Sello Hatang'; 'Sahm Venter'; 'Razeh Seleh'; 'Dr Mothomang Diaho'
Subject: NMandela & NMandela Foundation: RE: 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute
Importance: High

NELSON MANDELA &
NELSON MANDELA FOUNDATION
(Third and Fourth Defendant)
Chairperson of the Board: Prof Jakes Gerwel
Chief Executive Officer: Mr Achmat Dangor
Spokesperson: Ms Zelda La Grange
Nelson Mandela Foundation
Private Bag X70000
Houghton, 2041, South Africa
Telephone: +27 11 547 5600
Facsimile: +27 11 728 1111

Dear Mr. Mandela & Nelson Mandela Foundation,


The African White Refugee complaint filed with the International Criminal Court: Office of the Prosecutor on 05 May 2011, wherein you were accused of being complicit in the conspiracy of silence of SA's TRC FRAUD, has been submitted as a possible evidentiary document in the Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amicus Curiae.

In the matter between:

KINGDOM OF NORWAY V. ANDERS BREIVIK

Affidavit: Paragraph: 92. International Criminal Court:

---- ** ----
(AAA) 05 May 2011: Complaint ITO Art. 15 of Rome Statute to International Criminal Court at the Hague: Communication and Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute: Charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.(p.83). The Complaint Request the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to: “Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures. Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”) inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the ANC regime.”
---- ** ----

Please find attached for your records:

1. Notice of Application For an Order to approve the Applicant as an In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amici Curiae in the above proceedings in the form of written submissions in accordance with Article’s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b of Norwegian Constitution; and Article’s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“ECHR”) and Rule 44 § 2 of the ECHR Rules of the Court. (p.04)

2. Founding Affidavit: Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee, Lara Johnstone, Problem Solving Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist (p.43)

3. Annex A: Netherlands: May 18, 2011: Jus Sanguinis Petition (p.01)

4. Annex B: Switzerland: Jan 11, 2012: Petition Boer Volkstaat, Jus Sanguinis Right of Return for African White Refugees (p.02)


Respectfully Submitted,

LARA JOHNSTONE, Pro Se
http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/

1,384 Norwegian Media Informed of EcoFeminist Radical ‘Honesty Enemy’ Free & Fair Trial Support for Breivik. Response from Media: CENSORED.

1,384 Norwegian Media Informed of EcoFeminist Radical ‘Honesty Enemy’ Free & Fair Trial Support 4 Breivik. Response from Media: CENSORED.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 16 April 2012

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 9:21 AM
Subject: ['NO News Publication'] Case #: 11-188627 MED-05: NO v. Breivik & 05 May 2011: ICC: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute

Dear [Media Publication],

FYI: The African White Refugee complaint filed with the International Criminal Court: Office of the Prosecutor on 05 May 2011, accusing Norwegian Nobel Committee, Mandela, Tutu, de Klerk and 88 SA Media Publications, New York Times, UK Daily Telegraph and NL Algemene Dagblad of a conspiracy of silence of SA's TRC FRAUD, has been submitted as a possible evidentiary document in the Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amicus Curiae.

In the matter between:

KINGDOM OF NORWAY V. ANDERS BREIVIK

Affidavit: Paragraph: 92. International Criminal Court:

---- ** ----
(AAA) 05 May 2011: Complaint ITO Art. 15 of Rome Statute to International Criminal Court at the Hague: Communication and Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute: Charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.(p.83). The Complaint Request the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to: “Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures. Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”) inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the ANC regime.”
---- ** ----

Please find attached for your records:

1. Notice of Application For an Order to approve the Applicant as an In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amici Curiae in the above proceedings in the form of written submissions in accordance with Article’s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b of Norwegian Constitution; and Article’s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“ECHR”) and Rule 44 § 2 of the ECHR Rules of the Court. (p.04)

2. Founding Affidavit: Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee, Lara Johnstone, Problem Solving Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist (p.43)

3. Annex A: Netherlands: May 18, 2011: Jus Sanguinis Petition (p.01)

4. Annex B: Switzerland: Jan 11, 2012: Petition Boer Volkstaat, Jus Sanguinis Right of Return for African White Refugees (p.02)

Respectfully Submitted,

LARA JOHNSTONE, Pro Se
[..]
http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/

African White Refugee TRC Fraud Genocide Complaint to ICC, submitted to Norway v. Breivik Trial as Evidence

African White Refugee Genocide Complaint to ICC submitted to NO v. Breivik:

The African White Refugee complaint filed with the International Criminal Court: Office of the Prosecutor on 05 May 2011, accusing Norwegian Nobel Committee, Mandela, Tutu, de Klerk and 88 SA Media Publications, New York Times, UK Daily Telegraph and NL Algemene Dagblad of a conspiracy of silence of SA's TRC FRAUD, has been submitted as a possible evidentiary document in the Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amicus Curiae.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 16 April 2012

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 8:40 PM
To: 'ICC Office of Prosecutor'
Subject: ICC: Prosecutor Ocampo: RE: 05 May 2011: Genocide Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute
Importance: High

International Criminal Court: Office of the Prosecutor
Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
Post Office Box 19519
2500 CM The Hague
The Netherlands
Facsimile: +31 70 515 8555.

Office of the Prosecutor,

The African White Refugee complaint filed with your Office on 05 May 2011 has been submitted as a possible evidentiary document in the Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amicus Curiae

In the matter between:

KINGDOM OF NORWAY V. ANDERS BREIVIK

Affidavit: Paragraph: 92. International Criminal Court:

(AAA) 05 May 2011: Complaint ITO Art. 15 of Rome Statute to International Criminal Court at the Hague: Communication and Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute: Charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.(p.83). The Complaint Request the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to: “Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures. Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”) inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the ANC regime.”

Please find attached for your records:

1. Notice of Application For an Order to approve the Applicant as an In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amici Curiae in the above proceedings in the form of written submissions in accordance with Article’s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b of Norwegian Constitution; and Article’s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“ECHR”) and Rule 44 § 2 of the ECHR Rules of the Court. (p.04)

2. Founding Affidavit: Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee, Lara Johnstone, Problem Solving Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist (p.43)

3. Annex A: Netherlands: May 18, 2011: Jus Sanguinis Petition (p.01)

4. Annex B: Switzerland: Jan 11, 2012: Petition Boer Volkstaat, Jus Sanguinis Right of Return for African White Refugees (p.02)


Respectfully Submitted,


LARA JOHNSTONE, Pro Se

NO v. Breivik: EcoFeminist Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amicus Curiae

NO v. Breivik: EcoFeminist Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amicus Curiae

The application served on Court Officials on 15 April requests Norway to charge Breivik with Treason, if convicted in a free and fair trial equivalent to the Apartheid trial provided to Nelson Mandela, that Breivik and his Radical Honoursty accomplice, the Applicant be executed by Firing Squad.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 14 April 2012

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 5:42 PM
To: NO Oslo District Court: Admin (**@domstol.no); NO: Crt: Breivik: Oslo District Court (**@domstol.no)
Cc: NO: Crt: Breivik: Lippestad (**@advokatlippestad.no); NO: Lippestad: Tord (**@advokatlippestad.no); NO: Lippestad: Odd (**@advokatlippestad.no); Pros Holden: Tonje Meinich (**@jd.dep.no); Pros Holden: Grete Faremo (**@jd.dep.no); Pros Holden: Min. Justice (**@jd.dep.no); Pros Holden: Morten Ruud (**@jd.dep.no); Pros Holden: Politiet (**@politiet.no); Pros Holden: Politiet (**@namsfogden.no); Pros Holden: Politiet (**@politiet.no); Pros Holden: Politiet (**@politiet.no)
Subject: OSLO CRT REGISTRAR: 11-188627 MED-05: Notice of Application: Amicus Curiae from Norwegian Jus Sanguinis African White Refugee
Importance: High

TO: Registrar of the Oslo District Court
TO: NORWAY: Prosecutor Svein Holden (C/O Police & Dept. of Justice)
TO: DEFENDANT: Anders Breivik

IN THE OSLO DISTRICT COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY

Case #: 11-188627
MED-05

In the Application of:

LARA JOHNSTONE
Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amicus Curiae

In the matter between:
KINGDOM OF NORWAY V. ANDERS BREIVIK

Please find attached for filing:

1. Notice of Application For an Order to approve the Applicant as an In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amici Curiae in the above proceedings in the form of written submissions in accordance with Article’s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b of Norwegian Constitution; and Article’s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“ECHR”) and Rule 44 § 2 of the ECHR Rules of the Court. (p.04)

2. Founding Affidavit: Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee, Lara Johnstone, Problem Solving Radical Honoursty EcoFeminist (p.43)

3. Annex A: Netherlands: May 18, 2011: Jus Sanguinis Petition (p.01)

4. Annex B: Switzerland: Jan 11, 2012: Petition Boer Volkstaat, Jus Sanguinis Right of Return for African White Refugees (p.02)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT the Applicant requests that the Prosecution and/or Accused/Defendant inform the Applicant and Court of their objection or consent to this Jus Sanguinis African White Refugee Amicus Curiae application, by 17hrs (GMT+2) on April 23, 2012.

Respectfully Submitted,

LARA JOHNSTONE, Pro Se