Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Problem Solving: Poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc; are some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources.

Ecology of Peace RH factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate & sign their responsible freedom oaths; to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as international law; to require all citizens of all races, religions and nations to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are updated at EoP MILED Clerk.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

258 Norwegian Psychologists Association Members Notified that Breivik Acquittal is Justified by Media's Population-Terrorism Connection



258 Norwegian Psychologists Association Members Notified that Breivik Acquittal is Justified by Media's Population-Terrorism Connection

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 22 May 2012


From: Habeus Mentem
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 8:09 PM
To: Norwegian Psychological Association Members
Subject: [Psyk.For] Breivik Acquittal Justified by Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection?

Dear Members of Norway Psykolog Foreningen,

1. Do the Media deliberately and intentionally CENSOR NON-VIOLENT PROBLEM SOLVING, to create a socio-political pressure cooker environment, for their 'If It Bleeds, it Leads' Corporate Profit from Terrorism?

2. If Breivik proves his Political Necessity arguments -- i.e. 'Breivik brutally killed 77 to save 770 million from impending Islamic colonisation (massively censored from public discourse by media)' -- should he be acquitted?

3. In the absence of a media censorship campaign, Breivik would have raised his complaints non-violently. What has been the media and Oslo Court's response to non-violent EcoFeminist applications on behalf of Breivik receiving a free and fair trial?

4. Is there a massive media censorship campaign to censor the information that there are liberals, environmentalists, feminists, who care about whether Breivik receives a free and fair trial?


***********************************************************************
FACT: MEDIA CENSORSHIP WAS BREIVIK'S PRIMARY TERRORISM MOTIVATION:
***********************************************************************

Breivik's primary final motivation for Oslo/Utoya Terror Attacks was the Norwegian Media's Censorship:

Oslo Organized Crime Police Investigation Report "Explanation of 22 July 2011":

"[Breivik] has been censored for years. He mentions Dagbladet and Aftenposten as those who among other things have censored him..... He says that he also wrote “essays” that he tried to publish via the usual channels, but that they were all censored..... As long as more than twelve were executed, the operation will still be a success. The experts ask how the number twelve comes into consideration. Twelve dead are needed to penetrate the censorship wall, he explains..... The goal was to execute as many as possible. At least 30. It was horrible, but the number had to be assessed based on the global censorship limit...... He believes he had to kill at least twelve, because there is a censorship-wall preventing an open debate about what is happening in the country..... So I knew I had to cross a certain threshold to exceed the censorship-wall of the international media."


***********************************************************************
FACT: DECEMBER 2011: MASSIVE MEDIA CENSORSHIP IN BREIVIK TRIAL
***********************************************************************

‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection (PDF)

1,283 Norwegian Media Officials participate in massive Media Censorship Coverup of EcoFeminist Habeus Mentem Application to Oslo Court in Support of Breivik (1) Breivik's Right to Legal Sanity and a Free and Fair Trial; (2) The only logical outcome of a real ‘free and fair trial’ in Norway v. Breivik was: acquittal or the death penalty.

CENSORED BY 1,283 Norwegian Media Officials

***********************************************************************
FACT: APRIL 2012: MASSIVE MEDIA CENSORSHIP IN BREIVIK TRIAL
***********************************************************************

‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection (PDF)

Over 1,283 Norwegian Media Officials participate in massive Media Censorship Coverup of EcoFeminist Amicus Curiae Application to Oslo Court in Support of Breivik (1) Breivik's Right to Legal Sanity and a Free and Fair Trial; (2) The only logical outcome of a real ‘free and fair trial’ in Norway v. Breivik was: acquittal or the death penalty.

CENSORED BY OVER 1,283 Norwegian Media Officials


***********************************************************************
FACT: 10 MAY 2012: ECOFEMINISTS INDIGENOUS RIGHTS APPLIC TO SUPREME COURT
***********************************************************************

EcoFeminists Deep Green Ecology Indigenous Rights Application Filed in Norway v. Breivik Supreme Court


***********************************************************************
FACT: 11 MAY 2012: NEWS RELEASE TO INTNL NEWS WIRES: ECOFEMINISTS BREIVIK APPLIC TO NO SUPREME COURT: CENSORED
***********************************************************************

On 10 May 2012 the Application was finalized for the Norway Supreme Court.

On 11 May 2012 a 'test media censorship firewall' News Release was published to all International Wire Services, which includes: Reuters, Associated Press, Agence France Press (AFP), British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), Voice of America.

NEWS RELEASE:
Daniel Quinn on Totalitarian Agriculture (04:19)
GEORGE ZA / TRONDHEIM NO: On 10 May an EcoFeminist member of Radical Honesty SA culture, filed a Deep Green Ecology Indigenous Rights application in the Norway Supreme Court, which includes UN Special Rapporter on Indigenous Rights, James Anyana as one of the respondents.

The Norway Supreme Court are asked to issue two declaratory orders and review two applications submitted to the Oslo District Court in the Breivik matter. The initial Declaratory Order asks that the African EcoFeminist Applicant be admitted to the Norway v. Breivik matter as a Jus Sanguinis Radical Honoursty African EcoFeminist White Refugee Applicant.

The EcoFeminist applicant states that she is a Jus Sanguinis (Right of Blood) descendant of Norwegian artillery officer and citizen: Johan Pieter FÜRSTENBERG, who was born about 1760 in Bergen, Norway and then emigrated to South Africa.

Johnstone states she is an Indigenous European, because she is Jus Sanguinis (Right of Blood) directly descended from Norwegian, French, Dutch, British and German Settler Progenitor/s who traveled to South Africa as ‘settler' farmers, soldiers, medical personnel, religious and political administrators, in response to, and as a result of, their Nations Geopolitical ‘Colonial Empire' Lebensraum Decision-making policies, to find only the Bushman, as indigenous natives.

Her Jus Sanguinis predecessors ‘Colonial Empire' actions were motivated by their decision thousands of years ago to give up their sustainable Law of Limited Competition hunter gatherer / agrarian policies, to adopt unsustainable Totalitarian Agriculture policies, which results in surplus food production / population, creating population Lebensraum pressures culminating in resource, culling and conquering wars for new territory.

If approved, the EcoFeminist Amicus would address alternative legal arguments from a Problem Solving Radical Transparency EcoFeminists perspective as opposed to the Prosecution & Defense's Parasite Leeching Masculine (Reason and Logic) Insecurity Patriarchal perspectives to allow the court to base its decision on a more comprehensive, natural law deep green ecology legal framework.

Radical Honoursty Sustainability argues that a healthy ecological environment based on carrying capacity laws of sustainability is a sine qua non for all other constitutional rights. Legally this means that an individual whose lifestyle is sustainable, in terms of procreation (2 children or less per family) and consumption (ecological footprint) should be entitled to other civil and human ‘rights', whereas individuals whose lifestyle are not sustainable should be denied other rights until they amend their lifestyle to being sustainable.

Johnstone is 45 years old, has never been on welfare, has used contraception since the age of 19 to avoid pregnancy. She has lived an ecological small footprint life; to avoid aggravating overpopulation, resource wars; materialist consumerism and resource depletion. Her Ecological Footprint, excluding ‘Child-Free' factor is 13.16 gha.

The second Declaratory Order requests the Norwegian Minister of Culture to clarify whether Norway is legally a ‘Children of the Rainbow' Multicultural State, granting the Applicant her rights to invoke Radical Honoursty cultural law.

The court has acknowledged receipt but refuses to issue a case number.

***********************************************************************
FACT: MEDIA'S TERRORISM CONNECTION PROVEN TRUE
***********************************************************************

Media deliberately and intentionally CENSOR NON-VIOLENT PROBLEM SOLVING, to create a socio-political pressure cooker environment, for their 'If It Bleeds, it Leads' Corporate Profit from Terrorism.

If the RULE OF LAW, not the left wing notion of RULE OF EMOTION or the right wing notion of RULE OF MEN is applied in this case; then according to the Necessity Defence, if Breivik proves his arguments; one of them being massive Media Censorship, then he should be acquitted.

Now if the media -- as part of his trial -- are involved in deliberately obstructing justice by means of censorship; that adds significant weight to Breivik's argument of Media Censorship of the issues he considers important to be raised in public discourse.

If Breivik proves his Necessity arguments -- which can be summarized as 'Breivik brutally killed 77 to save 770 million from impending Islamic colonisation, massively censored by media' -- he should be acquitted.

Respectfully,


Lara Johnstone
Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity
Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored
http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/


**************************

SENT TO: 258 Norwegian Psychologists Association Members

Tidsskrift (05): [SS]

NO: Psych Assoc Newspaper; Ed: Bjornar Olsen; Ed: Arne Olav Hageberg; Editor; Psych Assoc

Psych Assoc. General (60): [SS]

GenSec: Ole Tunold; Ed: Per Halvorsen; Admin: Tone Slettebakken Nagelstad; Adv: Sverre Nielsen; Comm: Goril Wiker; Anders Skuterud; Anette Clausen; Siv Tove Engebraten; Aina Fraas Johansen; Andreas Hostmaelingen; Tove Beate Pedersen; Christian Zimmerman; Eilert Ringdal; Ellen Ekre Engh; Pernille Henriksen; Rolf Jacobsen; Lisbet Jonassen; Julius Okkenhaug; Heidi Roald; Joakim Solhaug; Ann Torunn Tallaksen; Bjorhild Stokvik; Eva Danielsen; Ingvild Skinstad Fossum; Tone Grette; Trude Hovde; Liv Kleven Hakonsen; Nina Knapper Lunde; Rita Synnove Standahl; Per Straumsheim; Bjorn Kristensen; Salim Bekkali; Toril Dyrhovd; Bente Asland Gjostol; Monireh Hakimjawadi; Johanne Hohff; Nanette Paulsberg; Hege Kilen Aasdokken; Bjornar Olsen; Winnie Engevold; Arne Olav Hageberg; Oystein Helmikstol; Unni Sandland; Nina Strand; Pres: Tor Levin Hofgaard; VPres: Rune Froyland; VPres: Aina Holmen; Ingunn Hagen; Elisabeth Holck-Steen; Ane Johnsen Lien; Kjetil Kaasin; Kristian Knudsen; Geir Skauli; Birgit Aanderaa; Tora Garbo; Jarle Refnin; Jon Tomas Finnson; Joan Overaas Halvorsen; Knut Haavard Klovfjell; Hanne Solskinsbakk

Akershus (25): [SS]

Helene Kindle; Elisabeth Romerike; Janjan Struik Follo; Elin Austlid; Asker and Baerum; Eivind Balnaes; Marianne Lovstad; Vidar Moronning; Wenche Syversen; Kristin Karlsen; Berit Klomsten; Marie-Anne Knudsten; Charlotte Teigset; Kristin Skogen; Linda John Rolfsen; Inga Lind; Arne Holen; Torhild Mehgard; Tonje Husum; Inga Skjanes; Anne Grete Greaker; Anne Norden; Ian Dahl; Elisabeth Myrstad; Hege Frostad

Aust-Agder (06): [SS]

Marianne Kuvaas; Annette Lilletvedt; Elisabeth Holck-Steen; Espen Odden; Harald Knutsen; Eldrid Hestmann

Buskerud:(06): [SS]

Leader: Berit Nielsen; Therese Brask-Rustad; Aase Proitz; Hege Cesilie Fossa; Marianne Vatne; Shartan Simoons

Finnmark (03): [SS]

Ida Overdal Stafnes; Ole Mikal Dragland; Helge Kaspersen

Hedmark (39): [SS]

Elisabeth Pettersen; Line Lysbakken; Heidi Wittrup Djup; Kristin Haugholt; Lene Engen; Erlend Wittrup Djup; Birgit Valla; Ty Riva; Ole Munk; Line Lysbakken; Rasmus Dynna; Cecilie Lovasdal; Ingunn Ullerhaug; Nina Karoliussen; Eva Marianne Ronning; Christine Blom; Cathrin Ringdal; Elie Marie Gustafsson; Ola Homb; Per Nygard; Anne Grethe Arnesen; Liv Hege Bakken; Anton Ahren; Yael Swissa Barr; Nina Bekken; Gunhild Rindal Kulbotten; Cathrine Dahle; Kristin Haugholt; Christian Ronning; Erik Elseth; Tommy Antonsen; Marit Kristin Sorlie; Rasmus Dynna; Eli Kristn Nesmoen; Margrethe Gledisch; Zemir Popovac; Irja Borsting; Vegard Hamre Sveen; Karin Borg

Hordaland (13): [SS]

Hordaland; Fredrik Hansen; Jorunn Berland Opsen; Thomas Nordhagen; Trude Senneseth; Tor Jacob Nordgulen; Arild Eikenas Vengen; Bjarte Bruntveit; Anne Jorunn Lunde; Vigdis Slotteroy; Peter Langeland; Synne Unstad Haaland; Henrik Gilde

Romsdal (07): [SS]

Torstein Svergja; Ragnhild Ese; Kjell Asmund Bryn; Tonje Saeter; Nina Catrin Garshol; Bard Lyster; Anita Ronningen (Anita.Ronningen@helse-mr.no)

Nord Trondelag (10): [SS]

Stein Aage Henriksen; Stein Aage Henriksen; Anita Veimo; Anita Veimo; Tom Verpe; Heidi Aurstad; Heidi Aurstad; Nina Sofie Hermann; Cathrine Kvaran; Cathrine Kvaran

Nordland (01): [SS]

Ruth Ellen Steinsvik

Oppland (05): [SS]

Gro Fodstad Eng; Henrik Wille Mathiassen; Endre Berger; Eivind Molmen; Hanna Karoline Torheim

Oslo (03): [SS]

Inge-Arne Teigset; Mehdi Farshbaf; Hedda Larsson

Rogaland (07): [SS]

Klara Overland; Havard Breistein; Bodil Handeland; Torunn Trohaug; Eldrid Robberstad; Svein Gran; Kjersti Tolo Hausberg

SognofFjordane (04): [SS]

Torjus Odelien; Raymond Kvammen; Ingvild Stedje; Herids Bergset

Sor Trondelag (12): [SS]

Morten Thorsen; Marthe Stornes; Hilde Wassmo; Trond Andreassen; Kathinka Vatne; Trond Reidar Carlsen; Ellen Margrethe Hoxmark; Gunnar Gotaas; Elin Killi-Olsen; Elin Bjoru; Jon Aarseth; Egil Henrik Solbu

Telemark (17): [SS]

Simen Hiorth Sulejewski; Louise Marie Svendsen; Siv Tonje Luneng; Beate Bauer; Knut Naper Hansson; Grenland Familiekontor; Ole Reine; Bente Jellum; Elisabeth Ronning Rinde; Spomenka Savic Balac; Anne Grete Haugen; Magnar Nesset; Simen Hiorth Sulejewski; Trond Kilnes; Terje Lier; Kari Fornes; Else Monesland; Terje Dahl

Troms (08): [SS]

Else-Marie Molund; Trude Kill; Lene Danielsen; Geir Steinar Eriksen; Torgunn Alise Hansen; Elisabeth Ovanger Barrett; Kenneth Fagermo; Samara Olsen

Vest-Agder (01): [SS]

Espen Haland

Vestfold (13): [SS]

Susanne Johansen; Ingvild Gregersen; Geir Walther; Daniel Bendiksen; Marte Skaare Mikkelsen; Steven Allen Hagen; Asalene Moland; Silke Gjetrang; Hans Erling Henriksen; Martin Hegdahl; Anne Marie Knutheim; Trond Rasmussen; Elisabet Romoren

Ostfold (06): [SS]

Harald Sandnes; Jan Hageselle; Mats Larssen; Ingebjorg Egge; Solvi Kristiansen; Steinar Oidvin


» » » » [PDF: Media Population-Terrorism Connection]
» » [Michael Maher, PhD: How & Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection]















Posted by at
Labels: , , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]

:: Fair Use Notice ::

FAIR USE NOTICE: The Norway v. Breivik blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the EcoFeminist vs. Breivik: Beyond Left and Right Wing: From an ecological perspective, all human economics and politics are irrelevant’ Argument. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to Norway v. Breivik Blog at: [EcoFeminist]