Aarhus CCC: Norways Censorship of Media's Population-Environment-Terrorism Connection during Breivik Trial

Aarhus CCC: Norways Censorship of Media's Population-Environment-Terrorism Connection during Breivik Trial

Communication to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee – Alleged Non-Compliance by Kingdom of Norway with the obligations under the Aarhus Convention: Rejection of Request for Access to Environmental Information from (a) Newspaper Editors, and (b) Bar Association; by Norwegian Environment Appeals Committee and Parliamentary Ombudsman.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | EcoFeminist vs. Breivik | 11 March 2013

Overview of Communication:

[1.1] Non-compliance to Access to Information (Article 4 (1) & (7)), by Media Editors: Adresseavisen: Editor: Arne Blix; Aftenposten: Editor: Hilde Haugsgjerd; Bergens Tidende: Editor: Trine Eilertsen; Dagbladet: Editor: John Arne Markussen; NRK: Editor: Hans Tore Bjerkaas; TV2: Editor: Alf Hildrum; VG: Editor: Torry Pedersen.

[1.2] A general failure to implement, or implement correctly, the General (Article 3(1)) and Collection and Dissemination of Environmental Information (Article 5(1)) provisions of the Convention; by the Bar Association (Advokatforeningen): Disciplinary Committee and Disciplinary Board for Advocates (Disiplinærnemnden for advokater).

[1.3] Non-Compliance to Access to Justice (Article 9 (1) & (4)), by the Environmental Appeals Board (Klagenemnda for miljøinformasjon): Erroneous ‘Environmental Information’ definition, Denied Due Process and Effective Remedy.

[1.4] Non-Compliance to Access to Justice (Article 9 (1) & (4)), by the Parliamentary Ombudsman: Denied Due Process & Effective Remedy.

Communication to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee – Alleged Non-Compliance by Kingdom of Norway with the obligations under the Aarhus Convention: Rejection of Request for Access to Environmental Information from (a) Newspaper Editors, and (b) Bar Association; by Norwegian Environment Appeals Committee and Parliamentary Ombudsman.

Summary -- 11 March 2013

Oslo & Utoya Attacks: Population, Resource Scarcity & Conflict:

On 22 July 2011, a fertilizer truck bomb exploded in Oslo within Regjeringskvartalet, in front of the office of Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, at 15:25:22 (CEST), killing eight and injuring at least 209; and ninety minutes later, a mass shooting occurred at a summer camp organized by the AUF, the youth division of the ruling Norwegian Labour Party (AP) on the island of Utøya in Tyrifjorden, Buskerud, by a gunman dressed in a homemade police uniform, killing 69, and injuring at least 110. The accused, Anders Breivik, admitted to the acts, as justified by necessity. His necessity justifications were two-pronged: (1) Resist Eurabia; (2) Gov & Media Censorship of debate and discussion of the consequences of Demographic/Immigration issues required Ultra violence to Access International Publicity.


Æquilibriæx CommonSism -- Scarcity as Cause of Conflict -- Activism:

Communicator is neither anthropocentrically liberal nor conservative, but an EcoFeminist Guerrylla Law Sustainable Security Radical Honoursty Transparency Primitivist. She is the founder of the CommonSism ideology -- Common Sense Guerrylla Laws for a Sustainable Commons -- and Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence, which is Equal & balanced -- Eco/Anthropocentric – law; as well as the unregistered Yshmael Guerrylla Law Political Party.

CommonSism’s Guerrylla Laws – based upon Aquilibriæx Jurisprudence – regulate human procreation and resource utilization behaviour, by means of legally defining the procreation and consumption difference, and consequent related Sustainable Rights/Penalties, between a Leaver and a Taker, to ensure sustainability; because Ecological Overshoot is a consequence of all other left and right wing ideologies and their adherents failure to legally (a) define the difference between sustainable and unsustainable procreation and consumption behaviour; and (b) provide legal rights to sustainable practices, and legal penalties to unsustainable individuals, corporations and organisations.

Sustainable Security Policy: Sustainability is Security: “There is no security without sustainability”: In the absence of an international new moral order where Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence confronts the Military Doctrine reality of Environmental Resource Scarcity induced conflict and resource wars, and implements laws to regulate and reduce human procreation and resource utilization behaviour; towards a sustainable, pre-industrial lifestyle paradigm; “overpopulation” and resource scarcity will result in conflict and war (perhaps nuclear) confronting regions at an accelerated pace, and “collapse of the global economic system and every market-oriented national economy” by 2050.


30 Nov 2011: Application for Writ of Habeus Mentem:

On 30 November 2011, communicator filed an Application for a writ of Habeus Mentem to the Oslo District Court. Copies sent to: 680 EU MP’s; 330 Norwegian Gov. Officials; and 1,283 Norwegian Editors and Journalists.

Among others, the Application argued that the roots of ‘left’ or ‘right’ wing terrorism are a result of the Mainstream Media’s censorship of non-violent problem solving to facilitate a socio-political pressure cooker reality for their “If it Bleads, It Leads” corporate propaganda profits from terrorism violence.

The Norwegian media totally censored information about the application filed to the Oslo District Court, from the Norwegian people.


15 Apr 2012: Application to Proceed as Amicus Curiae:

On 15 April 2012, communicator filed an Application to proceed as an Amicus Curiae, to the Oslo District Court. Copies sent to 1,384 Norwegian Editors and Journalists.

The Amicus provided the court with – among others – an EcoFeminist Jurisprudence perspective how Egotistical Masculine Insecurity, not Feminism, was a direct and indirect root cause and aggravating factor for most of the worlds problems, including the destruction of Western Civilization, due to (A) obstructing Radical Transparency communication problem solving, (B) being the cognitive foundation of the anti-Meritocratic Parasite Leeching Leadership (sic) Paradigm; (C) hence propagandizes an exponential growth of Parasite Leeching – “breeding war procreation” overpopulation and “egotist consumer” Consumptionism -- worldview.

Again the media chose to censor the information from the Norwegian public.


10 May 2012: Application for Review to Norway Supreme Court:

On 10 May 2012, Communicator filed an Application for Review to the Norway Supreme Court. On 15 May 2012, Deputy Secretary General Kjersti Buun Nygaard refused to process the application, or the appeal.


13 May 2012: Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection Report:

From 24 April to 14 May communicator sent copies of the 22 April 2012: Earth Day report: Acquittal or Firing Squad: If it Bleeds, it Leads, Media's Population Terrorism Connection to: 677 EU MP’s; 863 UK Lords and MP’s; 1,230 Univ. of Oslo Law Prof’s, 482 Law Prof’s & Lawyers, 1,278 Editors and Jouros, PM Stoltenberg and 1676 Gov. Officials, 104 NGO Officials and 258 Psychologists.

The “If It Bleads, It Leads :: Media Population-Terrorism Connection”, Report argued that Mainstream Access-to-Discourse Editors censorship of non-violent political grievances and problem solving activism facilitate a pressure cooker socio-political reality for the media’s “If it Bleads, It Leads” corporate propaganda profits, by (1) censoring the Scarcity (due to Overpopulation and Overconsumption) causes of violent resource war conflict; (2) that media abuse their publicity power in terms of their censorship of Ecocentric arguments submitted to courts; and by abusing public discourse/free speech resources; by providing certain parties with preferential and special access to such public discourse, and severely restricting or denying others any access to such public discourse; (3) Mainstream media avoid addressing or enquiring into root causes of problems as reported in Dr. Michael Maher’s report How and Why Journalists Avoid Population - Environment connection.


25 May 2012: Request for Access to Environment & Health Info:

On 25 May 2012, a Request for Environmental & Health Information was submitted to: Adresseavisen: Editor: Arne Blix; Aftenposten: Editor: Hilde Haugsgjerd; Bergens Tidende: Editor: Trine Eilertsen; Dagbladet: Editor: John Arne Markussen; NRK: Editor: Hans Tore Bjerkaas; TV2: Editor: Alf Hildrum; VG: Editor: Torry Pedersen; requesting the Editors to clarify their “editorial decision-making to censor information about the Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection, during a Norwegian Terrorism trial being publicized by international media on the international stage; and their decision-making to censor information regarding the EcoFeminist Applications to the Oslo District Court on behalf of a free and fair trial, for the Feminist hating ‘right wing’ terrorist, from their readers.” The editors refused to provide the requested information.


Disciplinary Complaints to Bar Association / Advokat Foreningen:

From 28 May to 18 June 2012, Communicator filed 170 Disciplinary Complaints with the Norwegian Bar Association: Disciplinary Committee and Disciplinary Board for Advocates, against attorneys representing Defendant Anders Breivik, as well as the 22 July victims families; for alleged violations of the CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud, etc.

On 19 June, the Disciplinary Committee and Board refused to process the Complaints, signed and submitted to them in digital format, per email, demanding they be printed and sent by landmail, in duplicate.

On 20 June, communicator filed a Request for their ‘Environmental Complaints Decision Making Justifications’ “demanding complainants waste paper, ink and non-renewable transportation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the Bar Association; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?”.

On 10 July, the Bar Association responded that they have no Environmental Justifications for their resource wasting Complaints policy, but insist that it be followed, irrespective of lacking any environmental justifications for it.

19 June 2012: Env. Appeal Board: Media Editors Environment Info:

On 19 June 2012, communicator submitted an Appeal to the Environmental Appeals Board: Request for Access to Environment and Health Information; RE: Censorship in Norway’s Media: (I) Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway’s Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny.


16 Aug 2012: Env. Appeal Board: Bar Association Environment Info:

On 16 August 2012, communicator filed an Appeal to the Environmental Appeals Board, for an “Order that the Disciplinary Board and Committee: Provide their Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications” for their resource wasting complaints policy


10 Sep 2012: Env. Appeal Board Rulings: ‘Unjustified’:

On 10 September 2012, the Secretariat of the Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) issued a ruling – in violation of due process principles, without having received any statements from any media editors, or Bar Association parties – that Communicator’s Appeals were ‘unjustified’. On 11 Sep, Communicator requested reasons for the EABs violations of general procedures of impartial enquiry and due process. On 18 Sept, the EAB responded that complainant was denied due process because her Appeals ‘clearly had to be denied’. On 08 Oct, Communicator requested clarify on why her Appeals ‘clearly had to be denied’, and the EAB’s ‘Environment’ definitions. On 03 Nov, Communicator submitted another request to the EAB, requesting clarification why her appeal ‘clearly had to be denied’ due process. On 06 Nov, the EAB denied Communicator’s request for clarification.


11 Nov 2012: Appeal of Environmental Appeal Board’s Rulings to Parliamentary Ombudsman:

On 11 Nov 2012, Communicator filed an Appeal of the EAB’S ruling to the Parliamentary Ombudsman: Erroneous Decision by Environment Appeals Board in Environmental Information Appeals re: [I] Editorial Decision-Making: Censorship of Media’s ‘Population-Environment-Terrorism’ Connection; [II] Bar Association: Anti-Environmental Complaints Policy.

On 27 November 2012, the Parliamentary Ombudsman ruled that “The Ombudsman has reviewed your complaint and the enclosed documents, and your complaint does not give reasons to initiate further investigations regarding the Appeals Board case processing or decision.”

» » » » [Summary Excerpt: Aarhus CCC: Johnstone v. Norway]